Another Judge Rules That Ohio's COVID-19 Lockdown Is Illegal
The decision says the "unbridled and unfettered consolidation of authority in one unelected official" violates due process and the separation of powers.
The decision says the "unbridled and unfettered consolidation of authority in one unelected official" violates due process and the separation of powers.
Plus: Breonna’s Law bans no-knock raids in Kentucky, Amazon's third-party problem, new findings on metabolism, and more...
It’s all about the revenue. Civil forfeiture brings in money, and lawmakers are more worried about their budgets than residents’ due process and property rights.
Plus: Virginia decriminalizes marijuana, it's not Trump's call whether we close the country again, and more…
Plus: Homeland Security has detained thousands of pregnant women, Ginsburg wrong about "seamless" contraception coverage, and more...
"It's far worse than we could have imagined," the student's attorney tells Reason.
Under fire for refusing to support Tara Reade, Milano says she never thought #MeToo would "destroy innocent men."
The county's ban on firearm sales is inconsistent with a new federal advisory as well as the Second Amendment.
Plus "An accused student's rights must be guaranteed—not left open for interpretation."
Why there are no "exceptions" to Article III
The extent of state and federal quarantine powers is surprisingly unsettled.
A bizarre Florida “red flag” case shows the importance of safeguards that protect people’s Second Amendment rights.
Psychologist Jesus Padilla was forbidden to complete research that could have set many indefinitely committed people free. He died with the work unfinished.
Americans are so locked into their political sides that many of them seem willing to cast aside some of the nation's long-established constitutional protections.
In Broward County, judges almost never reject police petitions for gun confiscation orders.
Your cellphone is tracking your movements and, despite legal protections, federal, state, and local officials are finding new and disturbing ways to use that information.
The university disallowed the testimony of witnesses who would have undermined the accuser's credibility.
The bill's requirements for "emergency" orders are loose, and it does not give respondents a right to a court-appointed lawyer.
orders university to temporarily reinstate accused student for Spring semester.
Following an insider trading conviction and the collapse of his career, Damilare Sonoiki is suing Harvard.
An interesting federal court opinion.
An attorney for Nick Flor says calls his effective termination "unfathomable."
Such a high approval rate reflects the threat these laws pose to due process and the Second Amendment.
"Other statements by Complainant ... along with undisputed other evidence, entirely disprove her bare assertions that she was incapacitated."
The greatest threat to protections for our freedom may be people's fear that people who disagree with them are exercising their rights.
An interesting due process case from a tribal court.
The 2020 hopeful used bogus statistics to change the way colleges treat students accused of sexual assault.
Mattress girl's unlikely friendship with Reason folks is the subject of a recent piece for The Cut.
Law enforcement and prosecutors have seized millions from people they’ve arrested. That might be coming to an end.
"Petitioner had absolutely no prior notice that either his mental health or the safe handling subsection would be at issue during the hearing before the trial court."
The California Court of Appeal upheld the fee, awarded to a student who had been accused of sexual misconduct.
"Red flag" laws leave gun owners defenseless.
Jim Ficken was fined $29,000 for violations of his town's tall grass ordinance.
The bill would make the criteria for federal grants loose enough to accommodate even the worst "red flag" laws.
The program would try to develop a surveillance system based on predictive tests that don't exist.
Plus: millennials are buying homes after all, protecting Pinterest from anti-vaxxers, and more...
If the court that hears the cases stands to profit from the fines paid by defendants, that's a violation of the Due Process Clause of the Constitution. The rulings have potential implications for other, similar conflicts of interest in the criminal justice system.
Two federal court rulings cite a significant conflict of interest.
When it comes to deciding who should keep their Second Amendment rights, the deck is stacked against gun owners.
Only if you assume they would have happened in the absence of gun confiscation orders.
The Democratic presidential contender suggests that "racist threats or anti-immigrant manifestos" could justify federal gun confiscation orders.
"The Second Amendment is not a suicide pact," the senator says, while glossing over the due process issues raised by gun confiscation orders.
Here is how the states with "red flag" laws fail to protect the constitutional rights of gun owners.
The Trump-endorsed response to mass shootings gives due process short shrift.
Because psychiatrists are terrible at predicting violent behavior, the wider net would catch lots of harmless people.
Under its "crime-free housing program," Granite City, Illinois, holds tenants strictly liable for illegal activity by a household member.
The case was brought on the family's behalf by the Institute for Justice, a prominent public interest law firm.