The New Censors
It's crucial that we all speak up for free speech.
Two years of rule-flouting by elites and ordinary citizens show the unsustainability of top-down prohibition.
They’re not likely to succeed, but the real goal is to seize any money he makes.
No, we should interrogate its persistent popularity and our relationship to it as forcefully as possible.
The president promises penalties he has no power to impose, while the company promises moderation it cannot deliver.
Technological—not political—solutions will secure true freedom of speech online
Online censorship is coming, and it’s going to be bad news for everybody.
Plus: unrest in Minneapolis, Twitter labels Trump tweet, and more...
Forcing Google to behave like a public utility would probably not serve the interests of those demanding that designation—or the rest of us.
The Mat-Su School Board evidently doesn't understand the purpose of a school.
Anyone who wants to restrict free speech should contemplate what it would be like if your enemy gets to choose what gets said.
Plague Inc. simulates the spread of coronavirus.
Government wants to force social media platforms to accept a “duty of care” to protect users from whatever they deem harmful.
Efforts to control the flow of information fail, but they muddle the quality of what people share in defiance of the censors.
When politicians call to punish “disinformation,” we should worry about what that definition encompasses.
The overturned rules banned microscopes and shovels as drug paraphernalia and prohibited pictures of cannabis or the equipment used to grow it.
Speech was more varied and vibrant than ever before—and then the backlash began.
Singapore ordered Facebook to attach a "false information" message to a news story written by a government critic.
Plus: The ACLU sues the FBI, divorce rates are at 40-year low, and more...
Attacks and threats by elected officials lead to inevitable self-censorship.
Most respondents, especially millennials, favored viewpoint-based censorship, suppression of "hurtful or offensive" speech in certain contexts, and legal penalties for wayward news organizations.
The FDA finally has agreed to allow a mild statement about the relative hazards of snus and cigarettes.
The state's hate crimes law—a "rarely enforced relic dating to 1917"—eviscerates free speech.
As always, the best answer to bad speech is more speech, not censorship.
Is there room for the entire world on this slippery slope?
A spokesman for Gov. Jared Polis objects to a news story not because it’s wrong, but because of who wrote it.
If you think a map of the moon might help an inmate escape, you might be a prison censor.
Amazon, Google, Facebook, and Twitter are in the federal government's crosshairs, but the technology necessary to undermine their dominance may already exist.
The company's Chinese ownership may have something to do with it.
Supervisor Shamann Walton thinks he can use restrictions on commercial speech to suppress political speech.
Conservatives deploy state power to go after speech they don't like.
Nobody is being "confused" by vegetarian meat substitutes.
Conservatives who argue that the video platform is constrained by the First Amendment are forsaking their constitutional principles.
Harry Potter and the Baffling Return of Religious Panic
The same First Amendment principles that apply to the president also apply to the congresswoman.