Open Thread
What’s on your mind?
What’s on your mind?
A delightfully chaotic episode of Freed Up where the hosts discuss how Minnesota wine moms have taken to the streets and the Star Wars prequels somehow end up on trial—again
DHS tells officers to use "de-escalation tactics," employ "a verbal warning" instead of force when feasible, and avoid "placing themselves in positions" that trigger the use of deadly force.
The incident raises more questions about federal agents' use-of-force policies and training.
Bad aim, conjugal visits, and a cavalier gun dealer.
The Department of Health and Human Services is launching a study apparently trying to find otherwise.
Despite a new state law protecting childhood independence, child welfare officials accused these Atlanta parents of neglect—and put their family under surveillance.
Politically-motivated firings and increased executive branch scrutiny set “a dangerous precedent,” warns a former archivist of the United States.
A zombie movie where mystical evil turns out to be a blonde guy named Jimmy.
The AI boom is showing the limits of our regulated monopoly model for generating electricity.
Residents of the chilly island coveted by President Trump favor independence—and subsidies.
The new Milken Center for Advancing the American Dream in Washington, D.C., sidesteps its founder's complicated history.
What’s on your mind?
Justice Barrett did not write Barrett v. United States, but other Justices wrote the majority opinion who shared a name with a party.
There is nothing originalist about Footnote Four, animus, and suspect classes. Let it go already.
In Wolford, the Supreme Court should clarify the facial/as-applied issue.
A few thoughts on the oral argument in Galette v. N.J. Transit Corp.
The real squeeze comes from government-distorted markets, not economic decline.
The administration's written policies make it likely that more people like Renee Good will be targets, and victims, of ICE.
Their trade group filed a petition asking the government to impose quotas and a 50 percent tariff on all imported quartz.
Justice Gorsuch suggested that the West Virginia did not raise the clear statement rule, Justice Sotomayor countered that a substantive canon cannot be waived.
Hecox will not graduate in May, but such mootness could have arisen in King v. Burwell.
This foolish, unnecessary, bellicose idea is running up against the "Lizardman's Constant."
"I can roll with policy changes, but what I can't roll with is a tolerance or an overlooking of antisemitism or any form of bigotry."
Plus: School integration, retribution for Iran, death to credentialism, and more...
Plus: Still waiting on the tariffs case.
Vice President J.D. Vance on the nature of power
What’s on your mind?
I have. Conservative litigants are vilified. Liberal litigants are celebrated.
Justice Kagan ponders at great length about whether there can be an as-applied challenge based on the Equal Protection Clause.
The plan violates multiple constituitonal provisions and goes against Supreme Court precedent. If somehow allowed to stand, it would gravely imperil federalism and the separation of powers.
Prof. Alicea explains the proper way to apply Bruen.
Time period to assess Second Amendment rights may arise in Wolford argument.
So holds a court, reversing student Guy Christensen's "disenrollment." The student also wrote, responding to the murder of two Israeli embassy employees in D.C. outside the Capital Jewish Museum, "I do not condemn the elimination of those two Zionist officials."
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks