How Politicians and Cops Tried To Dodge Responsibility in 2025
Presidents, legislators, and police officers were desperate to blame anyone but themselves.
On his way out the door last January, President Joe Biden issued broad, preemptive pardons for several relatives and political allies. Those stay-out-jail cards set an alarming precedent that could undermine the accountability of government officials by encouraging future presidents to shield underlings from prosecution for criminal conduct.
Although Biden made that reckless decision, he blamed Donald Trump, saying he had to act given the danger that the incoming president would pursue politically motivated prosecutions. That excuse was one of the year's most memorable attempts to dodge responsibility. Here are some more highlights.
Working the Refs
Throughout the year, Trump blamed his legal losses on "Radical Left" judges who supposedly were determined to obstruct his agenda for political reasons, even when the judges who ruled against him were appointed by Trump himself or other Republicans. A more plausible explanation is the president's tendency to ignore statutory and constitutional limits on his authority to deport people, restrict citizenship, impose tariffs, deploy the National Guard, and punish his political opponents.
TL;DR
After the House of Representatives approved the 1,037-page One Big Beautiful Bill Act by a single-vote margin in May, two Republican legislators belatedly objected to provisions they had not previously noticed. Although Reps. Mike Flood (R–Neb.) and Marjorie Taylor Greene (R–Ga.) implied they had been tricked into supporting policies they opposed, they could have avoided that unpleasant surprise by reading the bill before voting for it.
Fatal Mistake
In May, a federal judge in New Mexico blocked Fourth Amendment claims against three police officers who went to the wrong house in response to a late-night report of "a possible domestic violence situation," then shot and killed Robert Dotson when he came to the door with a gun in his hand. Although the cops were "negligent," they "reasonably believed that Dotson posed a severe risk of imminent harm," U.S. District Judge Matthew Garcia said, rejecting the argument that they "recklessly created the need to apply deadly force by going to the wrong address."
Risk Response
That same day, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected a similarly narrow analysis in a case involving a Texas cop who stopped a car for suspected toll violations. After endangering himself by jumping on the car as it began to move again, he addressed the resulting hazard by shooting the driver dead.
Electronic Scapegoat
In June, the Supreme Court revived a lawsuit provoked by a 2017 FBI raid in Atlanta that terrorized three innocent people, including a 7-year-old boy, after agents executing search and arrest warrants went to the wrong house. The SWAT team's leader claimed he had been misdirected by "a personal GPS device" that he later threw out, making his excuse impossible to verify.
Invasion of the Child Snatchers
Also in June, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit greenlit a lawsuit against two Midland, Texas, police officers who kidnapped a 14-year-old girl, Jade McMurry, from her home based on the erroneous claim that she had been "abandoned." The cops argued that Jade's mother, who was in Kuwait looking into a potential job but had arranged for a neighbor to regularly check on Jade and her younger brother, was responsible for "separating the family."
Removal Regrets
In July, Trump sympathized with farmers whose hard-working, longtime employees "get thrown out pretty viciously" as a result of his own immigration crackdown. He seemed dismayed by the consequences of delivering on his promise to implement "the largest deportation program in American history."
Missed Malfeasance
In December, Albuquerque Police Chief Harold Medina attributed the biggest law enforcement scandal in New Mexico's history, involving three decades of bribes that made DWI cases disappear, to the greed of "people I worked with" and "believed in." Medina, who says he had no inkling of the pervasive and persistent corruption even though he joined the Albuquerque Police Department in 1995 and has run or helped run it since 2017, glided over the significance of his own cluelessness.
© Copyright 2025 by Creators Syndicate Inc.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Hey all of ye Reasonoid readers! Do NOT bother to read this article (1st 2 paragraphs) about Joe Biden (or his policies)! Do NOT bother to read (or read about) ANY links, facts, or logic contained in this article and-or video! Do NOT bother to trouble your pretty little heads about silly factual details gathered by useless Reason-writer eggheads!
Because I, the SMARTEST ONE, can “summarize” it ALL for you! Here it is, above article summarized: “Senile Mackerel Snapper Bad”!
(/Sarc, revenge for moronic “summaries” about “Orange Man Bad”)
Boil the SQRL in acid.
“Throughout the year, Trump blamed his legal losses on "Radical Left" judges who supposedly were determined to obstruct his agenda for political reasons, even when the judges who ruled against him were appointed by Trump himself or other Republicans.”
That is such a dodge. Circuit court judges aren’t appointed like SCOTUS. Because senators in democrat states have say on how judges in their state are appointed, the republican pick is someone acceptable to the democrat senator. And vice versa in patriotic states. So Sullum is either too ignorant to know that, or is just outright lying.
So as always, another bullshit Sullum article where he proves he has zero credibility.
Also ignores that the inferior court judges largely lost and were stopped at appeals with trump having a 90% win rate at scotus so far.
"...So Sullum is either too ignorant to know that, or is just outright lying..."
"Both" does the job also, and seems to cover his imbecility and dishonesty. Like turd he's a lying pile of shit with a heaping dose of STUPID.
Trump
Dick
Sucker
JS;dr
He did a tl,Dr. I can't wait till he includes a js dr
Biden's pre-emptive pardons were wrong at the time but have now been retroactively justified by Trump's DoJ.
Lol. Retarded fucking shrike always demands democrats never be held accountable.
What did he pardon them for? What crimes did they commit?
Does not matter. Trump is fine prosecuting people who committed no crime.
"Does not matter. Trump is fine prosecuting people who committed no crime."
As always, Chinese turd lies and offers no cite.
Fuck off and die, asswipe.
Dear Leader called Fauci a traitor. So obviously he thinks Fauci committed a crime.
And slimy piles of dishonest shit like you disagree:
SRG2 12/23/23
“Then strode in St Ashli, clad in a gown of white samite and basking in celestial radiance, walking calmly and quietly through the halls of Congress as police ushered her through doors they held open for her, before being cruelly martyred for her beliefs by a Soros-backed special forces officer with a Barrett 0.50 rifle equipped with dum-dum bullets.”
Fuck off and die, shitstain.
Just don't blame Somalis.
"Those stay-out-jail cards set an alarming precedent that could undermine the accountability of government officials by encouraging future presidents to shield underlings from prosecution for criminal conduct."
I yield to no one in my contempt for Joe Biden's pardon binge, but he was following rather than setting precedent, specifically, the precedent set by George H. W. Bush, who pardoned six Reagan administration officials for the crimes they committed in connection with the Iran/Contra affair, to wit:
Elliott Abrams, a former assistant secretary of state for Central America; former National Security Adviser Robert McFarlane; former CIA officials Duane Clarridge, Alan Fiers, Jr., and Clair George; and former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger.
Bush undoubtedly did so because these individuals could have provided damning evidence against Bush himself for perjury in connection with Iran/Contra. Bush pretended to be "out of the loop", yet had written in his own diary in "real time" that he was one of the few who knew the "whole story". The pardons for Clarridge and Weinberger were issued "preemptively", as they were about to go on trial, making Bush's actions even more "dubious".
The moral of all this for you, Jake, is that the next time you write one of your innumerable "Democrats started it" stories, try checking with, you know, the facts, first. It's always a good idea!
I disagree, but both sides and whatabout to defend him! What crimes were the Biden officials pardoned for? Anything specific? Or were they blanket pardons?
Always trying to sound intelligent whilst ever penning screeds that undermine the intelligence you're futilely trying to claim.
The pardons for Clarridge and Weinberger were issued "preemptively", as they were about to go on trial, making Bush's actions even more "dubious".
They were not blanket pardons for unknown criminal acts-- as Biden's were.
They were a response to the leftist lawfare that was already in process.
Now crawl back to your cesspool.
The rightwing independent counsel was not engaged in leftist lawfare.
Quit being a moron.
How does that engage the previous comment?
"I yield to no one in my contempt for Joe Biden's pardon binge,.."
And yet you defend it, shitstain. Fuck off and die.
What crimes did the people pardoned by Biden commit?
Let's also add Trumps unconstitutional and sometimes criminal acts, of which he will suffer zero legal consequences.
MG; dr
"Let's also add Trumps unconstitutional and sometimes criminal acts,..."
None of which happened, asswipe.
JS; dr
Biden has been proven right about his preemptive pardons.
There's no evidence Biden knew about the pardons.
There's no evidence that slobbering Joe knew he was POTUS except for Jill really, really wanting to be 'first lady' to an imbecile.
"How Politicians and Cops Tried To Dodge Responsibility in 2025"
Please do one on how Sullum and the other TDS-addled steaming piles of lying shit tried to blame Trump with any and all 'issues'.
>Presidents, legislators, and police officers were desperate to blame anyone but themselves.
What about Governors, Sullum? Any of them trying to deflect blame and save their hides and grift?
Geaseball????