Economic Freedom Is Declining in the U.S.
We once ranked No. 4 in the world, according to the Heritage Foundation. Now we're 25th.

Politicians claim their bills bring us good things. Free health care! Child care! A cellphone for all!
But government isn't Santa Claus. Government is force.
Most every law takes away a little of our money or freedom or both.
The Heritage Foundation ranks economic freedom across the globe. The United States once ranked No. 4 in the world, but we've been in decline. This year, as my new video explains, we're 25th.
"If you care about living a prosperous life, you should care about what government economic policies are," says the Heritage Foundation's Derrick Morgan.
The foundation ranks countries' economic freedom based on things like rule of law, regulatory efficiency, open markets, fiscal health, etc.
The big reason the U.S. fell in the rankings is that Congress spends so much more money than government can squeeze out of us in taxes.
I say to Morgan, "'Free child care, free this, free that!' That sounds good for my freedom."
"Sooner or later, you run out of other people's money," Morgan responds. "More dollars chasing fewer goods leads to inflation," and inflation leaves us less financial freedom.
In addition, politicians ban some of our choices, like future natural gas hookups and gas-powered cars. Many want to ban contraception, TikTok, guns.
And on top of that, America's bureaucrats add thousands of regulations, most of which restrict individual freedom.
"Those are examples of our smothering government and why we keep dropping places," says Morgan.
The world's least free countries have even more smothering governments.
India ranks toward the bottom of the freedom list because Indian bureaucrats are empowered to decide whether entrepreneurs may try something new. Investors must get up to 70 different approvals. No wonder India stays poor.
It could be worse. The most repressed people in the world are trapped in countries at the bottom of the freedom list: Sudan, Venezuela, Cuba, and, of course, North Korea.
"It's bad in the economic sphere just as it is in the political sphere," says Morgan. "These things reinforce each other. The freer a country is economically, the better off they are."
Hong Kong was a great example of how economic freedom makes life better. In just 30 years, people there moved from poverty to prosperity.
It happened because Hong Kong's British rulers enforced rule of law but put few obstacles in the way of trying new things.
That allowed free people in Hong Kong to get rich and put Hong Kong at the top of many freedom rankings.
Then the British gave Hong Kong back to China. China promised to respect Hong Kong's open society, but a few years ago, China turned Hong Kong into another Chinese police state.
So Heritage dropped Hong Kong from its list. "We got to the point where we could no longer consider them separate from Communist China, sadly," says Morgan.
The freest countries on Heritage's list are Taiwan, Ireland, Switzerland, and Singapore.
But wait! Singapore doesn't have free speech. You can't criticize politicians or assemble without a police permit. They recently hanged some people for selling marijuana.
"Would you want to live in Singapore?" I ask Morgan.
"Your point is a good one," he responds. "This isn't a measure of freedom overall. It's a measure of economic freedom. Other freedoms are important, religious freedom…First Amendment freedom."
The Cato Institute's Human Freedom Index, which ranks both economic and personal freedom, lists Switzerland, New Zealand, Estonia, and Denmark as the freest countries. Singapore ranks 44th. America 23rd.
"Our point," explains Morgan, "is really to have a data longevity to look at. Does economic freedom over time lead to freer, more prosperous, healthier, and cleaner environments? It does."
That's something to remember next time politicians take away your choices or print more money.
"They're going to offer you free stuff," says Morgan. "It's all going to sound good…but their policies are in all likelihood going to make things worse."
COPYRIGHT 2023 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
We know freedom went out the fucking window like a bullet when Ron DeSantis banned schools from mandating masks.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I'm now creating over $35,300 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,300 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link----------------------------------------->>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM
Easily start receiving more than $600 every single day from home in your part time. i made $18781 from this job in my spare time afte my college. easy to do job and its regular income are awesome. no skills needed to do this job all you need to know is how to copy and paste stuff online. join this today by follow details on this page.
.
.
Apply Now Here—————————->>> https://Www.Coins71.Com
And he signed some of those freedom preserving bills in Brandon, FL during the "Let's go Brandon" moment of notoriety. An underappreciated jab, IMHO. Ron has been sticking his thumb in the Marxist eyes for a while now.
What message was he sending when he signed an expanded hate speech law in Israel?
That Jews control Ron DeSantis?
Six months ago I lost my job and after that I was fortunate enough to stumble upon a great website which literally saved me. I started working for them online and in a short time after I've started averaging 15k a month... The best thing was that cause I am not that computer savvy all I needed was some basic typing skills and internet access to start.
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)>>> https://www.Salarybiz.com
While this is the rare example of what a libertarian magazine SHOULD be covering, which I want to praise first, one thing bugs me:
Many want to ban contraception, TikTok, guns.
Who? Specifically, who with any power and that anyone takes seriously, wants to ban contraception?
If it's really that bad, dude, you need to come up with more practical and realistic examples.
wants to ban contraception?
The same people who want to ban abortions after 34 weeks.
Or maybe the people who want to ban abortion from the moment of fertilization, even in cases that can't possibly result in the birth of a healthy, viable baby? Those are the people actually putting laws on the books. The boogeymen who want to allow abortion after her water breaks seem to be pretty much entirely imaginary. For most of my life, I would have described myself as generally pro-life, but the anti-abortion extremists have driven me off with their blatant dishonesty and unrestricted lust to impose their will on others.
But on a serious note, the "many want" is a journalistic rhetorical trick that annoys me as well. Many is how many? And no, I'm not asking for a number, but when you say "many" that suggests that it's a significant number of mainstream thinkers and politicians. When we're talking about the body politic, it's true that "many" want to ban guns... some want to ban Tik Tok, and a few want to ban contraception. I think that's a more honest description.
I think in terms of Trolls in Discworld. They count One, two, many, lots… and anything over 3 or 4 could be 4 or a million. It's still "Lots".
It’s one of the most obnoxious rhetorical tricks “journalists” use, and which Reason uses an awful lot, which is why I call it out. Just behind “unnamed sources” and akin to the propagandists and rabble-rousers finding someone genuinely offensive who might agree with a person or group and tarnishing that group with the association.
Seriously, this is important. The most important of Reason topics, in fact. The should find good examples so the argument for greater freedom isn’t dismissed.
Who? Specifically, who with any power and that anyone takes seriously, wants to ban contraception?
Fundie-Nuts. Evangelicals. The same assholes who overturned Roe want to do the same for Griswold.
"Not a Constitutional right" say these Originalists.
Originalism is a fucking legal sickness.
Please enlighten the crowd here with how you managed to get your original "Sarah Palin's Buttplug" handle banned for posting kiddie porn to Reason.
Who wrote/ruled the Roe v Wade?
Here's a hint; It certainly wasn't Democrats.
who with any power and that anyone takes seriously, wants to ban contraception?
Good question. I have no doubt that some politicians are hostile to contraception, - except for their mistresses no doubt 😉 - and I know that there are a few radical groups out there who claim that contraception is often enough abortion - and using the same propaganda tools, and that some Republicans opposed a measure in Congress recognising a right to contraception, but no-one of any power has come out explicitly opposed.
I assume that you're opposed to attempts to restrict contraception.
I assume that you’re opposed to attempts to restrict contraception.
I'm absolutely against any restrictions on contraception. But I'm also NOT against a 26 week on-demand abortion ban, which I know, makes me literally worse than Josh Hawley.
Holy crap, I got responded to by TWO grey bar trolls.
I didn't think "Talking about more freedom is a good thing" was so controversial.
How was my reply at all controversial or trolling?
There are two opposing reasons why someone might question whether there's any serious opposition to contraception. One is that they're interested in the truth of the matter and are sceptical in the best sense and the other is that they are themselves opposed to it but for political reasons don't want to admit to it nor concede that there are groups out there who want to ban it. Only reasonable to ask a simple question of you to find out which.
What is a grey bar, btw?
LOL - no. I think you're in a highly respectable position, which makes you infinitely better than Hawley (unless we're talking about a 60m dash, where he'd probably beat most of us...)
This article makes a good point... WHICH freedom(s) are you measuring? Economic, personal, speech, self-defense, etc. ...
When we measure the "freedom to declare all of the not-MY-Party votes to be FRAUDULENT (AND to lie in court about it)"... We're Number One! USA Number One! Yeah, USA! USA Number One! USA Number One!!!!!!!!!!!
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
For Honest-Injun ethics and some original insights, sociobiology-wise, see ...
“Do-gooder derogation” (look it up) is a socio-biologically programmed instinct. SOME of us are ethically advanced enough to overcome it, using benevolence and free will! For details, see http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Do_Gooders_Bad/ and http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Jesus_Validated/ .
The big reason the U.S. fell in the rankings is that Congress spends so much more money than government can squeeze out of us in taxes.
Just when you thought trillion dollar deficits were crazy, two trillion dollar deficits became normal.
Yeah, but the Pentagon just... *checks notes* found another $6.2 billion to send to Ukraine.
And we already know where communism (the absence of economic freedom) ends:
https://www.independent.co.uk/asia/east-asia/north-korea-starvation-death-report-b2358167.html
The ruling Workers’ Party of Korea called for a meeting of the central committee in late February for the “very important and urgent task to establish the correct strategy for the development of agriculture”. Central planning to the rescue.... from central planning?
Were we told by Pyongyang when to plant and when to sow, we would soon want for bread....
There's an old joke, what would happen if the USSR invaded the Sahara? Nothing for two years, then a shortage of sand.
Stossel would be a great LP candidate for putting us back on the logistical replacement curve. And then you win! (https://bit.ly/3MaMx6F)
Well said Stossell...
Gov-Guns don't make sh*t.
And voters who think they do are morons.
The failure of the new economic doctrine is visible to the naked eye, but the Democrats still continue to shoot themselves in the foot. My opinion is that the authorities protect the profits of corporations in every possible way reducing oxygen for the self-employed and small businesses. A very simple example concerns copyright. People literally begin to pay for each note, for each line, and without receiving a real product .. information content is disproportionately expensive and this profit does not go to the country's budget. Now ask me why should I pay for air? No, I prefer to search and download via Chord Gitar. This practice will spread, trust me. Torrents will return again and then the authorities will have to make a choice.
That's an easy one to counter. Whenever you hear about anything remotely government-related, just mentally auto-correct "free" to "taxpayer funded". It's far more honest and corrects many bad ideas.
...or STOLEN by Gov-Gun threats ...
ALL government policy is economic policy. Unavoidably.
"Many want to ban contraception, TikTok, guns."
There's something SERIOUSLY wrong with anyone who would list TikTok next to guns as if they were equivalent restrictions of freedom. TikTok is a communications platform and used for exercises of free speech. Guns are used to kill people whose exercise of free speech you disagree with.