A GOP-Led Congress May Focus on Owning the Libs. Instead, It Should Focus on Owning Inflation.
If the midterms favor Republicans, their top priority needs to be the fight against inflation—whether or not they feel like they created the problem.

Republicans want to take over Congress and come Tuesday they might get their wish. Assuming they win both the House and Senate, they will face enormous challenges: a country still heading into a recession, inflation still high and rising, government deficits and debt as far as the eye can see, regulations strangling the production of energy, and much more. For these reasons, I offer some suggestions of what a victorious GOP should do over the next two years.
It's no secret that inflation isn't getting better. The latest numbers show that core inflation continues to rise, closing the door on the prospect of a speedy return to the Federal Reserve's 2 percent target. Meanwhile, workers see the prices of food and rent going up quite dramatically, while their real wages go down. Whether they feel like they created the problem or not, Republicans should make the fight against inflation their top priority.
As we all know, the main tool available to the Fed is to increase interest rates and trim its balance sheet in hopes of lowering the nationwide "aggregate" demand for goods and services. High interest rates raise borrowing costs for both private actors and the government. While there isn't much Congress and the president can do to ease the inflation-fighting effort's burden on the private sector (sending checks to people fuels more demand and higher prices!), there is plenty they can do on the budget side.
First, Congress and the White House must trim government spending. With debt at 100 percent of GDP, it's time to act. Our priority should be the drivers of our future debt: Social Security and Medicare. Republicans need to be the adults in the room making the case that high inflation, with another debt ceiling crisis on the way, requires a commitment to reforming these programs.
Directly relevant to the fight against inflation, other spending cuts are essential to deal with skyrocketing interest payments caused by the higher interest rates on our growing debt. This means that absent significant action, the Treasury Department will have to issue even more debt. Deficits will then further expand, which will further fuel inflation.
Second, when the fiscal bill comes due, and when unemployment rises and the economy slows because of the Fed's action, Republicans may be tempted to pressure chairman Jerome Powell to stop jacking up rates. Don't do it. Whether Powell has the backbone to continue fighting inflation in the face of palpable financial or economic hardship—and the corresponding political pressures—is questionable. Unfortunately, if he caves to the pressure and pauses to let the rate hikes work their way to reduced inflation—or, worse, if he agrees to stimulate the flailing economy by lowering rates and reengaging in quantitative easing—he will reignite inflation.
Republicans should follow the lead of President Ronald Reagan who, in the early 1980s, put no pressure on Paul Volcker to stop fighting inflation and let him stay the course. The cost was steep, but the alternative would have been worse. The same is true here.
There is a lesson from these high inflation episodes, which Republicans can turn into a policy goal. It's becoming obvious that once we have high inflation, containing it is always painful. As such, the only role of the Fed starting today should be price stability. That means demanding that it abandon other ill-fitting objectives like "inclusive growth" and fighting climate change.
Meanwhile, there are a few things Republicans shouldn't do. For instance, they should stay away from the bloated "family-friendly" programs social conservatives are so fond of. As economic study after economic study show, these programs will backfire and make the lives of families harder. Paid leave programs, for instance, reduce beneficiaries' employment and opportunities for promotion. Extending child tax credits will create further disincentives to marry and work. Child care subsidies make the supply of child care more, not less, expensive. These programs will also add to the budget deficit at a time when Congress should work especially diligently to reduce the debt. They're no way to cope with inflation.
Finally, Republicans should govern like adults rather than seeking revenge like ill-trained children. That means abstaining from launching investigations against their Democratic opponents. Going after political adversaries is fun, especially when you've been on the receiving end of their own investigations. But "Investigating the Dems" is not on the top of most voters' concerns this election season. Neither is "Owning the Libs."
So, Republicans, you want to be in power. Can you handle it?
COPYRIGHT 2022 CREATORS.COM.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Gotta get elected first.
And part of that is reminding everyone who caused the problem.
Why is it always the GOP that needs let bygones be bygones and not 'pounce'?
I am making 80 US dollars per hr. to complete some internet services from home. I did not ever think it would even be achievable , however my confidant mate got $13k only in four weeks, easily doing this best assignment and also she convinced me to avail.
For more detail visit this article… http://www.Profit97.com
Short version: "We're about to get our asses beaten, and we'd like to avoid jail for our malfeasance over the last two years."
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot (isu-14) of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
…
Just open the link————————————–>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
Haven't you heard? Amnesty's the word!
The bird hardest hit
Republicans really need to take some lessons on how to govern like adults from Democrats.
is that sarcasim
Pretty sure it is.
89
My mothers neighbour is working part time and averaging $9000 a month. I’m a single mum and just got my first paycheck for $6546! I still can’t believe it. I tried it out cause I got really desperate and now I couldn’t be happier. Heres what I d ..https://www.pay.hiring9.com
Veronica Rugby is an idiot. The GOP should do both. Our constitutional republic (not ‘our democracy’, as we are not a democracy) is in danger every moment the democrat party exists.
In order to save democracy, we must slaughter our political opponents.
We know you believe it.
LOL what a pile
I’ve made $1250 so far this week working online and I’m a full time student. I’m using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’AM made such great money. It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it. Here’s what I do for more information simply.
Open this link thank you...........>>> onlinecareer1
Wouldn't want the bad actions of the left to have any consequences so it's up to the right to clean up after them? Yeah, no. The disastrous and anti-American policies and direction of the left needs to be seen for the evil it is and that includes ramifications.
And this is as if the GOP could do anything without being sucked into the culture war to begin with.
"Worry about inflation while the left blames you for violence in inner cities!"
Yeah right.
No. No. A baby majority house and senate that can't override a veto would be responsible. But only if the GOP. They are to blame. Not the already passed budgets, spending bills, or EOs giving away hundreds of billions without Congressional approval. Just ignore the latter.
I hope so. I fear the voters have fully settled into a mindset of limitless spending though.
That's why I'm fine with "owning the libs," though I don't think that will happen like journalists seem to claim.
Basically, the republicans are kind of a charlie foxtrot. Dems have been pretty good at working in lockstep the last 15 years, to the point where anyone who bucks the party too much will have their entire support base yanked and get primaried out in the next election. Republicans bicker amongst themselves a lot more and usually don't have so strong and focused a leadership. They definitely have more members willing to buck the party line.
Mostly, with the rhetoric that has come out of the white house and the Democrats, I think (and hope) they've poisoned the well. Rs won't be able to do much, Biden won't be able to get jack shit done, and we'll all be much better off for the lack of legislation. The less the government does, the less they fuck things up.
"Dems have been pretty good at working in lockstep the last 15 years,"
lol
It's as if the Bernie/Hillary primaries never happened
Because Bernie didn't end up supporting Hillary right?
God you are a fucking idiot. You are just embarrassing.
He even got a beach house out of the deal.
Bernie and Hillary are on the same side.
They want the same things.
They only differ in speed of change.
It's as if Chemjeff didn't read leaked emails that showed how Democrat leaders worked to yank support from Bernie and give excess support to Hillary so that he was "Primaried" out of the Presidential Race.
But...lol...nothing accurate about what SiC said.
What, did I piss off a troll? Whoever it is is a grey bar.
And I don't know how accurate I am. But I'm pretty sure I know a few of the dirty dealings of the political parties.
Also, I'm not talking about Bernie or Hillary or anything. My original point was about the party apparatus at the local and state level.
Dems have some big money donors pulling strings -- Unions, Soros, etc... -- and have excellent ties to major media, television, movie makers, etc. They can be a massive help or hindrance in a primary, and house members run every two years. Doesn't take long after you tell, say, the Teacher's union to fuck off before your opponent has massive support in the primary.
Rs do similar shit, but they're not so good at it. They don't have media cover, they bicker amongst themselves much more often. They only vote as a block because, frankly, the rancor between the parties is so great crossing the line on any poison-pill laden bill is likely to lose you your base.
I don't want Rs to get done anything they want to get done. I want them in office almost entirely because they're not Democrats.
Part of behaving like adults is taking responsibility and assigning accountability. The Dems who made his mess need to be held responsible, like adults.
I surely hope you're not part of the amnesty crowd. It was wrong for Nixon, it is wrong for Biden, Fauci, Brix, the FBI, and the rest.
" The Dems who made his mess"
The dems did not make this mess alone.
Inflation? Biden.
COVID lockdown? Dems mostly.
Censorship collusion? Dems.
Russiagate? Dems.
Ministry of Truth? Dems.
Fluidentity mutilation? Dems.
Woke bullshit? Dems.
Trump was no saint, and should have fired Brix and Fauci. But he didn't lie his ass off to justify the lockdowns either.
It’s "Birx"…just sayin’…
I agree with all except inflation. Biden and D’s don’t get full credit, this was decades in the making. Same for all the wars and domestic spying, not mentioned above.
"I agree with all except inflation. Biden and D’s don’t get full credit, this was decades in the making"
Bullshit.
This was 1-1/2 years in the making, running the printing presses 24/7.
I guess I forgot that started 1.5 years ago. It's hard to remember those debt/deficit times of Bush, Obama and Trump.
*debt deficit free times*
80% of all $USD in existence at the moment was created in the last two years.
Yes, you are correct that other administrations have contributed to the national debt. But the bulk of the current inflation the country is experiencing is due to the policies of the current one.
Thanks for the post perlmonger. You really put my argument to the test. I spent a lot of time investigating the 80% increase in USD in the last 2 years. It seems this is largely an accounting increase due to a change in savings account rules being moved to a liquid currency (M1) in the Feds accounting.
Still the increase in USD in the past 2 years was huge. I still think we wouldn't be here without the policies and habits established over the past decades and that this was coming sooner or later, but I admit the short term causes are probably more significant than I argued above.
We can’t pin down exactly when the process started, but 1.5 years is on the right order IMO. A little low, probably. Probably ties to stimulation by the Fed (and similar issuers of other currencies — it’s worldwide) in anticipation of and during the business slowdown from the pandemic. So 2.5 years would be my estimate. Q2 2020.
I did say then that it’d eventually result in inflation. For a while, though, the extra money just went into mattresses. Low velocity made up for the greater quantity of credit available.
Inflation years in the making, but not decades. Money that's been out of circulation for decades doesn't just start circulating so fast.
I guess we'll see. If this inflation is just due to the last few years of government spending, stimulus payments and supply issues of the pandemic, it should self correct quickly now that those things have returned to normal.
If those things just caused the dam to break on problems going back decades, we will not see a return to 2% inflation anytime soon and we will be in for a serious recession in the meantime.
Oh piss off!
OK. I already pissed you off.
Yeah, lying piles of shit tend to have that effect.
LOL
The dems did not make this mess alone.
You're right. The GOP owns .0001% of it.
Fuck off,
Can you break down your analysis for us? How did you come to this conclusion?
Why do you think so highly of a party that continually let's you down? The GOP is only useful when they're out of power. In power they're just democrats with more borrowing, less taxing.
TBF, The Republican irresponsible spending increase will be less than the Democrat irresponsible spending increase by a few percentage points.
Edit: Oh, wow, I go away for a while, and an edit button appears
No, the inflation is owned by monetary authorities that in many countries (such as the USA) is so shielded from partisan influence that it can’t be said rightly to be owned by any party. The Fed sometimes says, in effect, “fuck you” to the party in power. These are people in the powerful banking establishment that doesn’t need political help, except in the very long term (think generations). They don’t need their phony-baloney jobs, though they do have those too.
The rest of the laundry list, though, that's strongly and obviously Democratic.
https://twitter.com/ThePacificNews/status/1587990798447960064?t=rNzAfhWWn4p_cq2MNKN7aA&s=19
LOL it must be so fun to work at Twitter right now - check out the additional additional context.
https://twitter.com/CarolinaGoldYum/status/1587883205868359685
I actually agree with this criticism. As much as it is enjoyable to see Biden get the same treatment that Trump was getting when he was fact checked, this is a bad game.
What context gets chosen? Which facts are relevant? This "privileged" space to rebut a viewpoint you disagree with will forever be fought over. And liberals are far, far better at eventually getting control of these.
I think it is decent to give liberals a taste of what its like to be the target of this nonsense- just so they can experience how shitty it is- but fundamentally this feature has got to go.
First, Congress and the White House must trim government spending.
Somebody started drinking early. And heavily.
This is where reason gets a bad name...
'owning'/controlling the Nazi's(National Socialist Empire) would put inflation into the people's/markets hands as nature intended.
Pretending that Gov-GUNS controls (or can fix) inflation is the problem at it's very core. Money is still largely a reflection of human labor. To put Gov-GUNS into a narrative to control humans isn't what the USA is about.
The underlying problem is the that Republicans have given up on being a party of ideas. Veronique is reaching back to Reagan for ideas and that is 50 years ago. Who is the leader with ideas in the Party at this time. Most of the people who could lead here have been purged.
Provide names of the idea "leaders" who have been purged and why, when they had any semblance of influence, they did not seek to actually have their ideas put into practice.
I could start with Paul Ryan or John Boehner. Abou 2010 the Tea Party movement started with good ideas to reign in government spending. Problem was once they got in the Tea Party leaders forgot the goal and just became an anti-Obama Party. Rather than advance the Speaker agenda they settle for just gumming up the works.
They did reign in spending. Google "sequestration" for a trip down memory lane.
You know who opposed the Tea Party?
Boehner for one. Quite vocally. Ryan was not a fan, either.
MORE, MORE, MORE 'ideas' on how to use Gov-GUNS against those 'icky' citizens...
Maybe the USA doesn't need any more 'ideas' on how GUNS can be used against its citizens.
As opposed to Democrats who believe in "modern" ideas like socialism. I guess mutilating children is new. So, there is that.
As many on these comments like to brag, you can't beat your enemy unless you adopt their tactics. That means abandoning the high road, which the GOP has proudly done.
So, results don't matter. All that matters is that you feel good about how they were achieved. The point isn't to solve problems and save the country from the left. Nope, the point is to ensure that sarcasmic hasn't had is delicate sensibilities offended.
Good to know.
I'm just agreeing with the author. There are plenty of effective things the GOP could do. Will they do any of them? Doubt it. Why? Because owning libs is more important.
So you agree that they shouldn't investigate things like the treatment of the January 6th detainees, the censorship of speech and such? You don't think any of that is important? Since when is investigation and oversight mutually exclusive with solving other problems? That doesn't make any sense. You can do both. Yet, deRugy and I guess you think they can't. DeRugy is just a piece of shit lying hack who doesn't want the Democrats held accountable for their crimes. What is your excuse?
I take it that you think investigations and revenge are more important than fixing the economy.
Got it.
I take it that you think investigations and revenge are more important than fixing the economy.
Holding people accountable for serious crimes is equally important. More importantly, one is not mutually exclusive to the other. You just pretend it is because you don't want Democrats to be embarrassed. You are so transparently dishonest.
Since the President is a (D), and a nasty partisan one at that, what would a (R) congress actually accomm?
Well, with a republican house leader, there are only two people that need impeaching - - - -
There is no way that impeachment will do anything other than waste time. No way is impeachment of Biden and Harris going to get 2/3 of the Senate. It's a fool's game to do it, just like Trump's first impeachment was a foolish waste of time.
^^ Impeachment when you don't have a chance in hell of it going anywhere is political theatre. The Ukraine-gate one was a foolish expenditure of political capitol for the Dems but their base sort of demanded it. Any impeachment of Biden will similarly get no where except to satisfy the lib-owner enthusiasts in the GOP base. So it will probably happen. However, Hunter Biden-Gate is not a winner (no recordings like Ukraine-gate), and trying to make heroes of the Oathkeeper and the Q'Anon Shaman types breaking windows on Jan 6. is probably futile. Is there a Covid-Gate case? Those policies were mainly at the state level and the voters are punishing the promoters of them.
I’m old enough to remember when Reason said it would be good if impeachments were used against all presidents. Were they lying?
Of course they were. Impeachment and investigation and Congressional oversight is something that only deplorables are subject to, silly
You really can't overstate what a piece of shit hack DeRugy is. God, she is just awful. Go fuck yourself you stinking bitch. Yeah, there needs to be accountability for your little socialist friends.
No inflation. Rig count up. Great economy. Praise Biden.
#TemporarilyFillingInForButtplug
Owning the libs IS fighting inflation.
The leftists WANT inflation. They WANT economic disaster. They want to be there, holding out the helping hand of the State to save people from the ruin their policies created.
And what's in that helping hand? Social ruin. Personal ruin. The destruction of family. The replacement of learning with training. The destruction of interpersonal relationships--particularly sex.
Man must be utterly destroyed so that Man can be remade to serve the State.
Nobody wants inflation. Don't be an ass.
If the Democrats don't want inflation, why have they done everything possible to create and sustain it? I am sorry but no one, not even Democrats, are that stupid.
If the Democrats don’t want inflation, why have they done everything possible to create and sustain it?
Because they're dumbasses.
They mean well. Do Democrats ever not mean well in your view? Are they ever not just wonderful but mistaken people in your opinion? Or is it just those evil Republicans who mean harm?
I think most people mean well. Unlike you I don't assume that everyone I disagree with is motivated by evil.
I think most people mean well.
Unless they are Republicans. Do you think no one reads what you say or remembers it? You are all about "we can't consider the other side evil" right up until you disagree with a Republicans. Do you understand how foolish you look? I hate phony arguments made for the convenience of the moment. And that is all you ever do.
Everyone knew what the results would be, and they did it anyway.
That’s not good intentions.
That's a stupid analysis. The truth is progressive economists have said repeatedly that they believe inflation is acceptable. Hell, they've even specifically argued against low inflation, claiming it makes price adjustments too difficult.
"If the Democrats don’t want inflation, why have they done everything possible to create and sustain it? "
Foe the same reason republicans have: because policies that fight inflation are painful in the short run and bad for getting reelected in the short run.
You don't know what the fuck you're talking about, do you?
"You don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about, do you?"
That's rich, coming from a fucking lefty ignoramus.
Thanks, Lana.
But "Investigating the Dems" is not on the top of most voters' concerns this election season. Neither is "Owning the Libs."
Depends on who you ask. From what I can see those two things are all that matters.
What do you think? Should Merrick Garland working with the social media companies to censor American's speech be investigated? Is that something important and potentially a serious crime or is it just "owning the libs"? If not, then I would think you would want it investigated. If not, then I would be curious to hear you explain why it is just no big deal.
There's a gulf between doing the important business at hand and no big deal.
DeRugy says it shouldn't be investigated. That it is just "owning the libs". Do you agree with that or not? I don't. I think DeRugy is lying here.
I think DeRugy is lying here.
Of course you do. Anyone who disagrees with you is a liar with bad intent. Congrats. You have fully assimilated.
So you agree with her. Violations of people's civil rights are just no big deal and something Republicans need to get over? Is that your opinion? Or do you even have an opinion? If you don't, then just admit you are shit posting and move on. If you do, then state it.
Understand, if your opinion is that the AG violating the civil rights of Americans is something the Republicans just need to get over and move on from, I would very much like that in writing. Trust me, it will be book marked and used against you for a very long time.
Violations of people’s civil rights are just no big deal and something Republicans need to get over? Is that your opinion?
No. I'm talking about priorities. Learn to read.
So you are saying that investigating that shouldn't be a priority? Should it ever be investigated? If not, then that looks to me like you are saying Republicans just need to get over it. If so, then when? When will you and deRugy agree that it is okay to find out the truth and hold Democrats accountable for something? A year? A decade?
I am really curious under what circumstances you think holding high office holders accountable for serious crimes and violations of Americans' rights should be a priority. Are there any priorities that are lower than that in your view?
Does anything ever come of these investigations? Does anyone ever face any real consequences? No. It's all a show.
I see you'd rather have bread and circuses than see the GOP act like responsible adults and do something about the economy.
How about the truth? How about that? To me at least finding out the truth is not a bread and circus. But I have this weird idea that the truth needs to be known. You do to, unless of course it involves something that makes Democrats look bad. Funny that.
I don't think her point isn't that there is nothing worth any investigating at all because she loves Democrats and thinks they're above reproach (that's the standard attitude here), it's that there are more important things the GOP could do to fix real problems rather than have a continual investigatory circuis.
I don’t think her point isn’t that there is nothing worth any investigating at all because she loves Democrats and thinks they’re above reproach (that’s the standard attitude here), it’s that there are more important things the GOP could do to fix real problems rather than have a continual investigatory circuis.
She doesn't think they are above reproach, she just doesn't want them investigated ever for anything. Yeah, that makes sense.
Serious question, do you ever have a criticism of the reason staff? If you do, I would love to hear it because there seems to be nothing they can write that you won't jump through your ass and twist yourself into knots to defend? Sort of like every Democrat means well and is just mistaken.
She doesn’t think they are above reproach, she just doesn’t want them investigated ever for anything.
That's not what I read. I'm done with this conversation. You infer and assert malice in everything you read. That's called arguing in bad faith. And I'm not dealing with it.
She says in so many words, they shouldn't be investigated. You are done with this conversation because you have painted yourself into a corner and now going to run away and hide rather than reconsider your views.
I am trying to help you. You should take the help.
like fix the covid mistakes?
For these reasons, I offer some suggestions of what a victorious GOP should do over the next two years.
Wait, since when are the Nazis open to suggestions from the Jews?
For that matter, since when are Jews open to suggestions from the Nazis?
Finally, Republicans should govern like adults rather than seeking revenge like ill-trained children. That means abstaining from launching investigations against their Democratic opponents
Call it what you want, but the brass at the FBI, DHS, etc. need prison time for directing the media giants to censor “misinformation” that upsets the DNC.
The Special Councils required for this to happen are only going to be enabled by Republican control of congress. If that’s what “owning the libs” looks like, so be it.
"Prison time". You're apparently referring to this:
https://www.techdirt.com/2022/11/02/bullshit-reporting-the-intercepts-story-about-government-policing-disinfo-is-absolute-garbage/
"A GOP-Led Congress May Focus on Owning the Libs. Instead, It Should Focus on Owning Inflation."
Why can't they do both? Those are not mutually exclusive actions.
In particular since "fighting inflation" realistically amounts simply to not passing massive new spending bills, something that literally takes no time.
De Rugy is arguing in bad faith. She is trying to misrepresent holding people accountable for corruption as some kind of childish temper tantrum. De Rugy is spreading Democrat propaganda and trying to manipulate people.
That's pretty much what all "mainstream" media does (in addition to the explicitly leftist outlets, of course).
They will certainly do the former.
Which means this article was both juvenile and pointless.
But I don't see the escalation of the culture war as being necessarily a bad thing. It is probably the only thing which will convince the normal people to get off their asses and stop it. Or it will fracture the country.
Trump-Horseface 2024!
1) Nothing scares the shit out of the fugazis more than the possibility of accountability for their beloved democrats. Especially for these last three years of hell they have foisted on us.
2) If the republicans actually do try to cut spending, when Sleepy Joe and his puppet masters inevitably say "no" and we get thd return of government shutdown brinkmanship, only a complete idiot would believe the fugazis will side with the republicans when the rubber truly meets the road. They haven't once ever, and they won't this time around either.
The fake libertarian Reason of Park Slope Welchie Boy, Goth Fonzie Woppo, and Mingo-Mango-Mongo DO NOT support broad-based across the board government spending cuts to all agencies and programs. They want America to follow the western European democratic socialist model of an expanding welfare state funded by decreased military spending and vastly higher middle class taxes.
When the Republicans shut down the government trying to stop Obamacare, reason had a fit and claimed the Republicans were trying to destroy the economy and holding the country hostage.
You can't overstate how awful they are. You really can't.
I don't know about "owning the libs" but some kind of investigations and reforms need to happen if we are to avoid a similar disaster to the last few years in the future.
There is next to nothing Congress can do. Inflation is largely the result of fed policy and executive branch spending, neither of which Congress can realistically affect much. Republicans will be forced to pass a budget that is similar to last year's budget. Beyond that, all they can do is not pass massive new spending bills. On the other hand, passing a few token "family friendly" bills gains them some political brownie points without costing much.
Tasking Republicans with reforming spending programs, given the administration in power, is either ludicrously naive or simply dishonest.
Exposing corruption in government is doing the adult thing. In fact, it is more important than shaving a few percent off the government deficit. Even bogus investigations like Russiagate were effective in tarnishing Trump's reputation and eventually winning in 2020; well-justified investigations into Biden corruption will be even more effective.
As we have seen before, de Rugy is just a progressive and leftists masquerading as a libertarian. The fact that her preferred policies occasionally come down more on the free market side than the average progressive doesn't change that.
De Rugy is arguing in bad faith and gaslighting people.
I think you mean concern trolling, not gaslighting.
"Tasking Republicans with reforming spending programs, given the administration in power, is either ludicrously naive or simply dishonest."
Exactly. And any other policy changes that would go a long way to taming inflation will simply be vetoed, particularly anything related to energy. As Reagan said, "A recession is when your neighbor loses his job and a depression is when you lose your job. A recovery only occurs when Jimmy Carter loses his job." The inflation picture the author is pining for will only occur after Biden is gone. The damage has mostly been done and there isn't a thing a newly elected Congress can do about it. The bleeding will at least be stopped, but the patient will still be sick for the next couple years.
A GOP-Led Congress...Should Focus on Owning Inflation.
Like the Allies retreating from Bastogne on December 19, 1941 handing their grenades and ammunition to the soldiers headed to the fight while blowing up the bridges behind them, the Democrats will be happy to let the Republicans "own" inflation. After a nice R&R in Paris, the liberals will then do everything within their power to prevent every measure de Rugy suggests to slow the bleeding, and blame everything on anyone but themselves.
The time to address the impending implosion was when Ronald Reagan was president, and every conservative or libertarian who had the temerity to suggest so was destroyed and the can was kicked down the road. We are now out of road.
The time to address the impending implosion was when Ronald Reagan was president, and every conservative or libertarian who had the temerity to suggest so was destroyed and the can was kicked down the road. We are now out of road.
Quoted For Truth.
We're fucked, and have been ever since the Baby Boomers didn't have the balls to fix the financial idiocy of the so called "Greatest Generation".
What plan does the GOP have for inflation? I have not heard it. I know they complain, everyone complains, but I hear no solutions. So I don't think Republicans are going to be any good on inflation. To be fair a heck of a lot of libertarians aren't very good on inflation solutions either (not that any will be in congress).
The problem isn't the printing presses, the problem is the spending. It's deficits and borrowing. New money out of nothing. In the case of borrowing it's still new money, as it doesn't get paid off until decades later. So my fear under the Republicans is tax cuts followed by spending increases. That isn't fighting inflation. I'm all for tax cuts but the spending cuts are more important.
Inflation is a money supply greater than the demand for money. Too many dollars chasing too few goods and services. So cut the government spending.
And cut regulation so that there are more goods for the money to chase. You seem to forget that. The thought of not controlling other people's lives must really be abhorrent to you.
The Republicans can at least stop spending from goin up. And they can also undo a lot of Biden's more insane regulation. So, yes, they can do something about inflation.
As a libertarian, it is a given that I am against the regulatory environment. Get government OUT of people's lives and businesses.
As for Republicans stopping spending from going up, history shows, including the latest Republican administration, as that the spending won't go up as fast, but it will still go up. Trump raised spending more than Obama did, and in only one term. That he didn't raise it as fast as Hilary would have does not make him a model of fiscal prudence. Biden is indeed insane, but I see no evidence that Trump or DeSantis or whoever else get in office in 2024 will reduce the actual rate of spending. Not the rate of spending increases, the actual rate of spending. There is a difference.
No one campaigning on the right under the R banner is talking about cutting spending.
That should be a clue, but it won't be.
"National Conservatism" will only end one way.
"What plan does the GOP have for inflation? I have not heard it..."
We had a POTUS who had a pretty good handle on that, but TDS-addled assholes like you did your best to give us what we have now.
Yes: infrastructure bills, inflation reduction bills, student loan forgiveness, etc. You know: progressive, Democrat legislation.
Obstructing the progressives and Democrats any way they can.
"The problem isn’t the printing presses, the problem is the spending."
That would be amusing if it weren't so stupid; what do you think is being spent?
But cutting government spending is your solution to everything. You're chasing every specific problem with the same ideological solution. Inflation? Austerity. Recession? Austerity. Stubbed toe? Cut taxes and spending. It's just not serious talk.
You're right to imply that Republicans are by far the less fiscally responsible party. Biden has reduced the federal deficit by the largest amount over one year in American history. Not that he'll get credit from the very people claiming to care most about that.
Meanwhile, democrats propose the nuanced approach to combat inflation: raise taxes. You know they're sincerely trying to solve the problem with an open mind when their solution is so completely different from their usual ideological desires.
My solution to the current inflation is to ignore it, but nobody asked me.
Makes sense: this isn't about you.
There is no better way to "own the libs" than by stopping their profligate spending, which has the side effect of ending inflation.
-jcr
But "Investigating the Dems" is not on the top of most voters' concerns this election season. Neither is "Owning the Libs."
Except putting a stop to the progressive agenda is what a lot of people are voting Republican for. Parents really are concerned about teachers pushing CRT or queer theory on their third graders. People really are sick and tired of homeless tent cities in the middle of their downtown shopping districts. People really do feel like the Soros prosecutors and criminal justice reform have given violent criminals carte blanche.
Your headline starts with: "A GOP-Led Congress May Focus on Owning the Libs." I've read your entire post, and I still have no clue what you meant by that. Pathetic!
Read the comments sometime, lol.
The reason this will not happen is that politicians will try to please all their constituents - the ones who demand more income and the ones who demand lower prices or both at the same time - and, since that's impossible they will give more money away and try to blame someone else for inflation. As usual it's the people who are driving inflationary spending by demanding the impossible. Politicians don't care as long as they keep their cushie jobs in government so they don't have to back to writing wills for a living.
Are you suggesting populism isn't sustainable? Seriously?
There will be, say, 235 Republican congresscritters. Some can work on "stopping inflation" and others can work on investigating Biden, the FBI, Fauci, what and whomever. Put sensible legislation in front of Biden/Harris and let them do the vetoing. Cause the Dems to act like the spoiled children in the room. It will all depend on the GOP leadership which, to be perfectly honest, doesn't look all that clever and robust to me, unless some changes are made.
Your media diet has filled your head with hate and lies.
Maybe you could point out the hate and lies in their comment. Or are you just delusional?
The implication that there's something to investigate about Biden, Fauci, or the FBI? Other than hurting God Emperor Trump's feelings.
How does an investigation into Hunters laptop and his business dealings as well as the possible ties to his father (the big guy) and the willingness of some in the FBI to try and cover it up (discovered because of several whistle blowers) have anything to do with Trump? Again how does an investigation into Fauci’s illegal funding of gain of function research have anything to do with Trump? So… Delusional it is. I believe you are projecting your hate and lies on to others.
wrong, wrong, wrong. they need to do both. they must own the libs because we need justice. in terms of inflation the best thing they can do is repeal the spending bills enacted by the dems as well as just not spend any more money.
You think a Republican Congress--this kind of Trumplicking Republican Congress--will not spend any more money?
Where do they find you guys?
Assertion presented with no evidence... Like zero...
Genuine question: does the American legislature have any power over the Federal Reserve Board, can it do anything to shape its policies? How about the executive branch, do they have any legal power over the Fed?
The Nazi-Empire has no "power" limits (It's not the USA/Constitutional).
The Constitution doesn't even grant power for a Federal Reserve Board.
Practically speaking, they have no significant power over the Board itself or any of its committees. The president makes appointments to the board as vacancies come up.
Really, the only authority Congress has is over the Federal Reserve's existence itself. They could repeal the Federal Reserve Act, and then the notes the banks issued would no longer be legally synonymous with "dollars".
(One of the above comments is "hinged".)
Got some real economic geniuses in here.
I don't understand this impulse to strain to have an opinion on subjects you clearly know less than nothing about. Just refrain. It's the mature thing to do.
Republicans do in fact have a plan to tackle inflation. It's to cut Social Security and Medicare, making millions of old people even poorer than they are, which might lower demand for medicine and food enough to cause suppliers to lower prices.
And if that doesn't work, they can always attack the old people with hammers.
I have a B.S. in economics and have forgotten more about the subject that you will ever know. Let me give you a hint about it; there is more to the subject than "I want"
Tony, you are literally one of the most ignorant people on earth. That would be bad enough but you manage to make it worse by taking pride in it. You seem to be proud of the fact that you are ignorant and hold it against anyone who isn't.
Democrats already fulfilled their plan to compulsively STEAL everyone's labor/savings by poking threats of Gov-GUNS at them.
And not just STEAL as in BORROW where the stolen money is returned but STOLEN and SPENT as in the stolen money is all gone already.
No Tony.. It's your nut-job party who is beating old people with hammers by robbing them their entire life with Gov-Guns so much they have nothing left when they get older.
The biggest curse/criminality of the Democrats mentality is that of "conquer and consume" instead of "create and earn".
Government manifests the money and invests it with value by fiat. I really think some of you guys go around looking at pieces of paper with government symbology printed all over them thinking they are somehow products of nature. And of course they are always exchanged according to cosmically moral rules.
LOL... You are so in love with Gov-Guns...
Government gave money it's invested value??? Seriously?
So money isn't anything but a trade median for Gov-Gun-Forces??
Well since GUNS don't make food, shelter or user-energy I guess money can't save the 'poor' people now can it. But GUNS can just kill them off and 'save' the planet?? 🙂
Yeah; that's right. The "symbology" is that of human labor creating human resources and storing that value for trade or retirement.
Just because you think livelihoods revolve around endless GUN-Theft doesn't mean you claiming the USD is nothing but a piece of paper justifies your manipulated theft wet-dream.
The GOP proposals are actually very vague with respect to Soc Security and Medicare. There was a GOP 2023 budget study proposal to raise the age you can get Medicare from 65 to 70. That would certainly be unpopular with near-retirement folks.
https://banks.house.gov/uploadedfiles/rsc_2023_budget_final_version.pdf
We've gotten six years of Democrats pwning Donald Trump, and you're not going to let the Republicans have a few minutes?
Nah, I want some COVID Nuremberg trials, at least in the first year.
And Nuremburg style punishments, so others will fear the consequence of following in their foot steps.
So you want show trials which don't allow any exculpatory evidence to be presented? (Albeit for people who have been very very bad).
I think two years of gridlock would suit me just fine. Send your ideas to the White House, watch them get vetoed, rinse and repeat. Keep sending the message that spending needs to be reigned in, and keep making the demented one veto them. Then in 2024, roast their Democrat asses on a spit for failing to cut spending and resubmit them when DeSantis is in office. Yeah, I know, it's a dream...
A GOP-Led Congress May Focus on Owning the Libs. Instead, It Should Focus on Owning Inflation
Can't they do both like 45th pres of the United States Donald J Trump?
Go fuck yourself. It's the only play the democrats have had for at least six years. Where were your concerns then you fucking sheep?
The two main drivers of inflation have been the Fed Reserve’s too loose monetary policy in conjunction with Biden’s stifling regulatory burdens.
I’m all for Congress legislatively rolling back the regulatory state but that will take time and require either Biden signing off or veto overrides.
Is DeRugy willing to pre-emptively assign fault for any budget related government shutdown to Biden and the Democrats?
If not then she is full of shit. And this article is nothing more than the USUAL Reason running cover for the Democrats.
A Dem-Led Congress Focused on Owning Trump, Instead It Should Have Focused on Owning Inflation.
Yet (T)Reason never said one word on that.
Commies stick together.
What the GOP Congress should focus on is the attempted bloodless coup against the sitting President with the lie of Russian collusion by Hillary Clinton and what really happened on Jan. 6th. and why Pelosi did nothing and refuses to release her intelligence and communication up to and during the riot. Next they need to focus on the corrupt DOJ and FBI and get rid of and prosecute the corrupt members.
When they get that done they need to focus on the Biden’s corruption, Hunter’s laptop, who the “big guy is” and probably have another impeachment, Biden this time.
It is difficult to understand how the Fed's interest rate tinkering does much vis-a-vis inflation. As I understand it (and I am no economist), an interest rate is the price for extending credit. And those prices are set by markets, in this case global markets. I find it hard to believe that the Fed can manipulate global interest rates in any significant way.
As for fiscal responsibility, I agree that "Republicans need to be the adults in the room" but I would not hold my breath. The recent massive budget blowout got its start under the Trump administration and was eagerly expanded under his successor.
Higher interest rates slow borrowing, and most businesses need to and borrow. Also consumers tend to buy less on credit when rates are higher, and build less homes, slowing the economy with less demand. Borrowing is important for businesses wanting to grow, so raising interest rates work for a sane Administration. Why it won’t work for this Administration is it is insane, it keeps printing money devaluing the dollar at the same time interest rates are going up, which makes everything more expensive. There for you get a stagnant or declining economy with high inflation rates.
See Jimmy Carter and the late 1970’s if you are a younger person. You will learn about the word stagflation.
"May" focus on owning the libs?
You know who else focused on "owning" inflation?
Gerald Ford?
I’ve made $1250 so far this week working online and I’m a full time student. I’m using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’AM made such great money. It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it. Here’s what I do for more information simply.
Open this link thank you...........>>> onlinecareer1
I agree with everything in this article. Especially if "reforming" Social Security and Medicare means privatizing or abolishing completely.
Good luck getting elected by Republicans with that proposal. Remember the old GOP guy who thought Medicare wasn’t government during the ACA roll-out?
‘At a recent town-hall meeting in suburban Simpsonville, a man stood up and told Rep. Robert Inglis (R-S.C.) to “keep your government hands off my Medicare.”
“I had to politely explain that, ‘Actually, sir, your health care is being provided by the government,’ ” Inglis recalled. “But he wasn’t having any of it.”‘