Elon Musk Owns Twitter, So the Rules Are Going To Be Whatever He Wants
If the bird site's new owner wants to protect free speech, he should focus on resisting government requests to remove content.
If the bird site's new owner wants to protect free speech, he should focus on resisting government requests to remove content.
Plus: Congress remains too cautious about marijuana, myths about independent contractors, and more...
On Tuesday, the senator erroneously claimed that "free speech does not include spreading misinformation."
In a now-deleted tweet, the official White House Twitter account attempted to frame a mandated cost-of-living increase in Social Security checks as the result of President Biden's good "leadership."
Plus: Hate speech is free speech, tax gap is stable, and more...
Plus: For Halloween, the editors describe what scares them most about politics and government right now.
Plus: Charlottesville cracks down on city employee speech, judge dismisses "blackout challenge" lawsuit against TikTok, and more...
Two new studies say there's no evidence of political learning on social media, but it does increasingly teach us to hate our opponents.
An officer used an anonymous account to lash out at police protesters (and a Reason post). He was uncovered and fired.
The podcast is a debate between legal scholar Brad Smith and myself.
Plus: Musk's Twitter purchase may be back on, global deflation may be looming, and more...
Regular people are not so terminally online.
Does Section 230 shield YouTube from lawsuits about recommendations? Can Twitter be forced to pay damages over the terrorists it hasn’t banned?
Democrats and Republicans both demand solutions that are inconsistent with the First Amendment.
They mandate occupation of private property without the consent of the owner.
A new Cato report sheds light on "jawboning," or attempts by state actors "to sway the decisions of private platforms and limit the publication of disfavored speech."
It would be far easier to prosecute sex trafficking if voluntary sex work were legal.
Behind the scenes, federal officials pressure social media platforms to suppress disfavored speech.
Social media companies are eager to appease the government by suppressing disfavored speech.
Plus: Chinese censorship targets feminists, a new view of income inequality, and more...
"PM has made mistakes," tweeted Podcast Movement. "The pain caused by this one will always stick with us."
Deplatforming controversial content is perfectly legal—and often counterproductive.
The bill makes little note of parents' ability to control their own children's social media access.
Corporate law profs disagree on the merits of Twitter's lawsuit to force Elon Musk to follow through with his offer to buy the company.
Social media platforms may marginally support free speech. Government censors are trying to stop that.
"I look forward to teaching and engaging in a host of activities relating to constitutional education," said Shapiro.
A new ruling says Twitter and Facebook are not “common carriers" and thus cannot be forced to carry politicians' messages.
The Hereticon organizer on deplatforming, tribalism, and why tech dudes and journalists are natural enemies
Plus: The Pro-Choice Caucus thinks choice is a harmful word, trade restrictions worsened the baby formula shortage, and more...
Plus: A democratic socialist running for office is caught up in a MeToo witch hunt, inflation woes continue, and more...
Plus: Elon Musk's plans for Twitter, officials want to tax NFTs, and more...
"I am not okay with you making laws that prevent me from doing what I feel is good for me."
If there is a headline, it should probably be: "Elon Musk Agrees With Twitter That Censoring the Hunter Biden Story Was Wrong."
If Musk was so fond for South Africa's segregationist policies, why did he refuse military conscription and jump ship to Canada as a teen?
Today's big powerful companies could become tomorrow's also-rans, no government intervention required.
"I hope that even my worst critics remain on Twitter, because that is what free speech means," said Musk.
Plus: How misinformation spreads, ignoring inflation, and more...
Forcing private companies to host speech violates the First Amendment.
The SpaceX/Tesla founder and billionaire has articulated lofty free speech ideals. Can he make them reality?
Plus: A short debate on intellectual property
"I think it's very important for there to be an exclusive arena for free speech," says Musk.
$43 billion takeover bid reveals knowledge-class anxieties over free expression
The libertarian vision of an 'uncontrolled' internet is not the dream of dictators.
Protections for open communication require more than the commitment of a single person.
A regulatory filing indicates that Musk is now the company's largest shareholder.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks