Court Should Focus on Coercion in Murthy v. Missouri
The government is entitled to try to persuade social media to take down posts, but not to coerce them to do so.
The government is entitled to try to persuade social media to take down posts, but not to coerce them to do so.
The company leaves Texas over an “ineffective, haphazard, and dangerous” age-verification law.
The college is the latest in a spate of schools reinstating SAT and ACT test requirements.
Even as they attack the Biden administration's crusade against "misinformation," Missouri and Louisiana defend legal restrictions on content moderation.
The ruling allows the CNVH private sponsorship program - covering migrants from Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela, and Haiti to continue. But it is likely to be appealed.
Kristy Kay Money and Rolf Jacob Sraubhaar are now suing the city of San Marcos, Texas, saying they're being forced to keep a Klan-linked symbol on the front of their house is a physical taking.
Plus: An interview with Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte, Minnesota lawmakers try to save Minneapolis zoning reform from excess environmental review, and the White House's new housing supply action plan.
Plus: More reactions to the Supreme Court's other decision in the Trump ballot disqualification case, D.C.'s continued minimum wage confusion, California's primary elections, and more...
The ruling has the most extensive discussion of the meaning of "invasion" in the Constitution ever included in a court decision.
A federal judge in an ongoing case called the porn age-check scheme unconstitutional. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton doesn't seem to care.
The First Amendment restricts governments, not private platforms, and respects editorial rights.
Supreme Court arguments about two social media laws highlight a dangerous conflation of state and private action.
The Supreme Court seems inclined to recognize that content moderation is protected by the First Amendment.
The laws violate the First Amendment because they require social media sites to abjure most content moderation, and platform speech they disapprove of.
Both states are trying to force tech companies to platform certain sorts of speech.
The difficulties some cities are experiencing arise because many migrants aren't allowed to work, and because of restrictions on construction of new housing.
The WikiLeaks founder already has spent as much time in a London prison as DOJ lawyers say he is likely to serve if convicted in the U.S.
Ralph Petty likely violated the Constitution. In a rare move, a federal court signaled this week that lawsuits against him may not be dead on arrival.
The judge found that Food Not Bombs' activity was clearly expressive conduct under the First Amendment.
Food Not Bombs activists argue that feeding the needy is core political speech, and that they don't need the city's permission to do it.
Tyler Harrington has filed a lawsuit after four police officers burst into his home in the middle of the night.
Legal scholars Frank Bowman and Steve Vladeck weigh in on Texas's dangerous argument.
The appeals court dismissed a civil rights lawsuit by a Laredo gadfly who was arrested for asking questions.
Priscilla Villarreal, also known as "Lagordiloca," has sparked a debate about free speech and who, exactly, is a journalist.
Perhaps Governor Abbott will flout a directive from the Supreme Court in a future case, but reports of Texas "defying" the Supreme Court are bunk, and many making such claims should know better.
Plus: A listener asks if libertarians are too obsessed with economic growth.
Undocumented immigrants aren’t the same as an invading army, but the Texas governor keeps acting like they are.
The argument is badly wrong, and would set a dangerous precedent if ever accepted by courts.
"Responding officers should have immediately recognized the incident as an active shooter situation," the report found.
The court could potentially resolve the case without addressing the invasion arguments.
Plus: Inheritance taxes, lady gadgets, a stabbing in South Korea, and more...
An error-prone investigation in search of a fugitive led police to Amy Hadley's house.
S.B. 4 will let officers arrest people well beyond the border. It also “provides civil immunity and indemnification” for state officials who get sued for enforcing it.
Plus: Houthi attack, Milei misinformation, Instagram rooster eugenics, and more...
Plus: Austin's newly passed zoning reforms could be in legal jeopardy, HUD releases its latest census of the homeless population, and a little-discussed Florida reform is spurring a wave of home construction.
Ralph Petty's "conflicted dual-hat arrangement" as an advocate and an adjudicator was "utterly bonkers," Judge Don Willett notes.
Plus: BTS gets conscripted, Harvard gets down with plagiarism, cruise ships ban weed, and more...
Plus: Austin and Salt Lake City pass very different "middle housing" reforms, Democrats in Congress want to ban hedge fund–owned rental housing, and a look at GOP presidential candidate's housing policy positions.
The brief urges the Supreme Court to reverse its badly misguided precedent in Pruneyard v. Robins.
Americans want choice in education. Politicians need to catch up.
The ruling is mostly based on statutory issues, but also covers the "invasion" question.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) introduced a bill last month that would bar federal agencies from forcing employees to respect preferred names or pronouns.
From March 2021 to July 2023, 74 people were killed and nearly 200 were injured in vehicle chases occurring in counties affected by Operation Lone Star.
He is not the first defendant that has struggled to reconcile the controversial raids with self-defense.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10