Supreme Court: Andy Warhol's Prince Prints Not 'Transformative' Enough for Fair Use
The case could have long-term implications for how broadly fair use can be applied.
The case could have long-term implications for how broadly fair use can be applied.
"Since March 2020, we may have experienced the greatest intrusions on civil liberties in the peacetime history of this country," Gorsuch wrote. That might be an exaggeration, but it isn't far off.
Plus: A new lawsuit in Montana over the state's TikTok ban, the economic realities of online content creation, the rights of private companies, and more...
The narrow rulings concluded the platforms aren’t responsible for bad people using their communication services.
On Monday, the Supreme Court sided with an Alabama death-row inmate who, after surviving a botched lethal injection attempt last year, says he wants to die by gas chamber instead.
The state defied a Supreme Court ruling by banning guns from myriad "sensitive places."
Plus: APA says social media not inherently harmful for kids, senators propose Artificial Intelligence Regulatory Agency, and more...
He either doesn't understand or won't admit why this violates the First Amendment.
U.S. District Judge Robert Payne concluded that 18-to-20-year-olds have the same Second Amendment rights as older adults.
The Supreme Court has accepted certiorari in Carnahan v. Maloney to consider whether members of Congress can sue to force disclosure of information from the General Services Administration.
Justice Kavanaugh continues to support granting certiorari in cases his colleagues do not wish to hear.
The Supreme Court issues five merits opinions, but there are still forty more waiting.
Biden v. Nebraska has far-reaching implications for presidential power.
The decision is at odds with Supreme Court precedent, and endangers the constitutional rights of millions of people. This brief urging the court to reverse it was filed by the Cato Institute and myself.
Plus: A look back at Rochelle Walensky's tenure as head of the CDC
The state's own attorney general has said Glossip deserves a new trial.
A new report purporting to show that Missouri's arguments for standing in Nebraska v. Biden are based on a lie fails to deliver.
The Supreme Court wants further briefing on whether it retains jurisdiction
Its existence was revealed when Justice John Paul Stevens' papers were made public earlier this week.
There are several interesting revelations, including an unpublished dissent by Justice Antonin Scalia.
The author of one of the Supreme Court's most widely hated rulings left us extensive files on the case, which have just been made public. They could help shed light on key unanswered questions about.
A preliminary injunction in Illinois may signal the demise of a long-running public policy fraud.
Plus: Divides over misinformation, on free markets and social justice, and more…
Overruling Chevron won't gut the administrative state or even severely constrain it. But it could help strengthen the rule of law.
One of today's two cert grants comes in a case asking the justices to reconsider Chevron v. NRDC.
This Supreme Court term is setting a record for not releasing opinions in argued cases.
Plus: Missouri attempts to ban gender transition treatments for adults, another bad social media bill hits Congress, and more...
A win for Geraldine Tyler, who is now 94 years old, would be a win for property rights.
The decision may even be unanimous.
Takings cases often divide opinion along left-right ideological lines. The home equity theft case argued before the Supreme Court today is a rare exception.
Plus: More details emerge on Fox News' firing of Tucker Carlson, Aubrey Plaza shills for Big Milk, Biden announces he's running for president, and more...
Justice Kavanaugh was alone in noting his desire to accept certiorari in two cases the justices rejected.
Mifepristone will remain on the market for now with no changes to how it can be prescribed.
Is this what equity looks like?
The Court will determine whether the Due Process Clause prevents the government from using asset forfeiture to seize property and hold it for many months without a timely hearing.
Today's opinions are a requel to prior splits among the most recent Republican appointees to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear two consolidated cases by Alabama women whose cars were both seized for more than a year before courts found they were innocent owners.
Plus: Dominion defamation suit against Fox News starts today, Republicans' debt plan, and more...
Plus: What the editors hate most about the IRS and tax day
Those claiming they are subject to unconstitutional agency proceedings need not suffer through agency proceedings before bringing their claims to federal court.
My presentation covers an important takings case currently before the Supreme Court.
U.S. District Judge Kathleen Cardone was unimpressed by the Biden administration's argument that marijuana users are too "dangerous" to own guns.
A Colorado man was convicted under an anti-stalking law for sending hostile messages online.
The Biden administration is defending a federal law that disarms Americans based on "boilerplate language" in orders that judges routinely grant.
The 5th Circuit noted that such orders can be issued without any credible evidence of a threat to others.