Review: Neil Gorsuch Says There Are Too Many Laws
No one knows how many federal crimes there are, the Supreme Court justice notes in Over Ruled.
No one knows how many federal crimes there are, the Supreme Court justice notes in Over Ruled.
A handful of states use loopholes to get around a Supreme Court ruling that declared the practice unconstitutional.
A panel examining what is in store for October Term 2024.
The Court's decision to overturn Chevron should be seen as more of a "course correction" than a revolution. (Updated with Video.)
Judge Joseph Bianco’s decision emphasizes that constitutional rights and protections belong to individuals, not groups.
Two brothers are asking the Supreme Court to stop their town from using eminent domain to steal their land for an empty field.
A prominent appellate practitioner responds to recent attacks on the justices and the Court.
Reason talked with pro-life Americans who are uncomfortable with the post–Roe v. Wade abortion policy landscape.
Could a panel of lower court judges evaluate ethics complaints against Supreme Court justices?
State boards use outdated laws to target content creators, raising urgent questions about free speech in the digital age.
Opposing Priscilla Villarreal's petition for Supreme Court review, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton portrays basic journalism as "incitement."
The outrageous seizure at the center of Rebel Ridge resembles real-life cash grabs.
No, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit's initial standing rulings were not faithful applications of Supreme Court precedent.
It is now available on SSRN. The article critiques the Supreme Court's decision in the Trump Section 3 disqualification case.
The plaintiffs in Juliana v. United States are seeking Supreme Court intervention to revive their case against the federal government.
Recent New York Times reporting about the Court's deliberations on the case modestly reinforces the view that the Court ruled that disqualification from office-holding under Section 3 requires congressional legislation.
One of the nation's finest oral advocates discusses representing the United States in the Supreme Court and other topics.
The Court this year reversed Chevron, a decades-old precedent giving bureaucrats deference over judges when the law is ambiguous.
The ruling says some restrictions on guns in "sensitive places" are constitutionally dubious but upholds several others.
The ruling concludes that the government failed to show an Illinois ban is "consistent with this Nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation."
Priscilla Villarreal, known as "Lagordiloca," is suing law enforcement for violating her First Amendment rights. She is appealing to the Supreme Court.
In the same week that Jack Smith refiles his Trump Indictment, Justice Jackson talks about the SCOTUS decision that made refiling necessary.
In charging the former president with illegal election interference, Special Counsel Jack Smith emphasizes the defendant's personal motivation and private means.
Kevin Fair fell behind on his property taxes in 2014. The local government eventually gave a private investor the deed to his home.
The justices are hearing future cases, but that has not sped up their work.
The Edmondson Community Organization accrued a modest property tax debt. The group paid dearly for that.
After the crackdown on anarchists died down, it became more difficult to imagine anyone could go to jail in America solely for political heresy.
Does the Second Amendment allow the government to ban guns in common use for lawful purposes?
Fewer laws and less government would be a better solution to judicial warfare.
In a new book, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch describes the "human toll" of proliferating criminal penalties.
Insofar as the justices split, it was due to long-standing disagreement over the nature of the Court's original jurisdiction.
When those on parole or probation are included, one out of every 47 adults is under “some form of correctional supervision.”
An attack on the independence of the federal judiciary.
The Supreme Court created, then gutted, a right to sue federal agents for civil rights violations.
The decision shows that the Supreme Court has forced judges who like gun control to respect the Second Amendment anyway.
The Supreme Court is not as “extreme” or divided as it may seem.
Libertarian legal giant Randy Barnett on his epic Supreme Court battles, the Federalist Society, and watching movies with Murray Rothbard.
His criticism of President Joe Biden’s proposed Supreme Court reform is hard to take seriously.
The Supreme Court's conservatives are not cutting conservative litigants any slack (and that's a good thing).
Plus: Venezuelan election follow-up, racial segregation is back (for Kamala), and more...
Plus: A listener asks the editors about Project 2025.
Antonin Scalia twice joined Supreme Court decisions rejecting bans on that particular form of political expression.
The proposals include term limits for Supreme Court justices, a binding ethics code, and a constitutional amendment limiting the president's' immunity from prosecution. All 3 are potentially good ideas. But the devil is in details.
Thanks to C-Span, video is now available.
Joan Biskupic reports that the justices were initially inclined to back Idaho in the EMTALA case, until they realized the case was messier than they had thought.
Plus: Vance's anti-Trump emails, Venezuelan elections, toxic masculinity discourse, and more...
Chelsea Koetter is asking the Michigan Supreme Court to render the state's debt collection scheme unconstitutional.
Candid end of term comments from one of the Court's progressive justices.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks