Federal Judge Dismisses Comey and James Indictments, Saying Trump's U.S. Attorney Appointment Was Illegal
The charges were dismissed without prejudice, so the Justice Department can try again.
The charges were dismissed without prejudice, so the Justice Department can try again.
Dozens of "shaken baby syndrome" convictions have been overturned over the years, but until now, no state court system has limited its use in criminal prosecutions.
Interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan concedes that the grand jury never saw the "edited" version of the indictment.
A magistrate judge says the government’s missteps may warrant dismissal of the charges against the former FBI director.
The decision is consistent with the president's avowed concerns about "overcriminalization in federal regulations."
If fairness in the justice system depends on wealth or political value, we’ve missed the point of justice entirely.
A jury found Sean Dunn, who went viral in August for throwing a Subway sandwich at a Border Patrol officer, not guilty.
The government posits that the former FBI director tried to conceal his interactions with a friend who was publicly described as "a longtime confidant" and an "unofficial media surrogate."
Elsid Aliaj says the seizure violated state law and the Second Amendment.
The former FBI director also argues that the charges against him are legally deficient and that the prosecutor who brought them was improperly appointed.
Grand juries have declined to indict numerous times when Trump's prosecutors have brought excessive charges.
"There was tremendous criminal activity," the president averred, urging unspecified charges against former Special Counsel Jack Smith, former FBI lawyer Andrew Weissmann, and former Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco.
The case is the second in two weeks, with little legal merit, filed by a neophyte prosecutor against a Trump opponent
From pretrial detention to the threat of foreign rendition, the Abrego Garcia case shows how political prosecutions and coercive plea deals have eroded the promise of a fair trial.
The legal rationales for prosecuting James Comey, Adam Schiff, and Letitia James suggest the president is determined to punish them one way or another.
The fugitive freedom fighter allied with a government known for imprisoning dissidents, curtailing civil liberties, and forging equality in the sense that people are more equally oppressed.
The administration is pursuing a vendetta, but Comey and the FBI deserve scrutiny and reduced stature.
By demanding that the Justice Department punish the former FBI director for wronging him, the president provided evidence to support a claim of selective or vindictive prosecution.
The FBI director's portrayal of the case exemplifies the emptiness of his promise that there would be "no retributive actions" against the president's enemies.
There is ample evidence to suspect prosecutors are just doing President Trump's dirty work rather than following the facts of the case.
In her new book, 107 Days, the former vice president reminds us that she is ever the prosecutor.
Two years after the state attorney general charged dozens of protesters with racketeering, a judge found the case unconvincing.
With government agencies turned into partisan weapons, trust is a tribal matter.
A recent federal appeals court decision underlines the importance of that safeguard.
... and also allows victim's attorney Caree Harper and me to defend the conviction.
Two members of the House Judiciary Committee say the case against Michelino Sunseri epitomizes the overcriminalization that the president decries.
The contrast between the two cases illustrates the haphazard impact of an arbitrary, constitutionally dubious gun law.
Afghan prosecutors, interpreters, and other U.S. partners are being evicted, abandoned, or forced back into Taliban hands.
No matter how John O'Keefe died, the government failed here on multiple levels.
Law enforcement seized Robert Reeves' Chevrolet Camaro without charging him with a crime. After he filed a class-action lawsuit, that changed.
The White House may be setting us up for a new wave of police abuses—and necessary calls for reform.
The case against Michelino Sunseri exemplifies the injustice caused by the proliferation of regulatory crimes—the target of a recent presidential order.
John Moore and Tanner Mansell were convicted of theft after they freed sharks they erroneously thought had been caught illegally.
Trump rightly decries the "absurd and unjust" consequences of proliferating regulatory crimes.
Martin is a bully and a menace to free speech. Unfortunately for him, his own free speech caught up with him.
A Mississippi mom was charged with a felony years after she gave birth for drug use early in her pregnancy.
Even if Laredo cops punished Priscilla Villarreal for constitutionally protected speech, the appeals court says, they would be protected by qualified immunity.
Trump's appointees are wielding federal power in a manner that appears every bit as corrupt as what he complained about on the campaign trail.
That's the powerful argument that Mayor Adams's lawyers are making, citing (among other grounds) the leaking of a resignation letter containing "the wildly inflammatory and false accusation that Mayor Adams and his counsel had, in essence, offered a quid to the Department of Justice in exchange for the quo of dismissal."
New Mexico State Police Sgt. Toby LaFave, "the face of DWI enforcement," has been implicated in a corruption scandal that goes back decades and involves "many officers."
A driver who was acquitted of drunk driving joins a class action lawsuit provoked by a bribery scheme that went undetected for decades.
In the latest guilty plea, a local defense attorney says he had been bribing cops to make DWI cases disappear "since at least the late 1990s."
For a decade and a half, officers made DWI cases go away in exchange for bribes, relying on protection from senior officers implicated in the same racket.
Federal prosecutors say the city's police department was the main focus of a 15-year bribery scheme that also involved the sheriff's office and the state police.
Local news reports detail how Polk County, Minnesota, charges drivers and petty offenders with drug-free zone violations like no other county in the state.