Biden's 'Economic Plan' Is Industrial Policy That Will Be Terrible for Workers and Consumers
The Democratic president is supercharging former president Trump's failed approach to domestic manufacturing.
The Democratic president is supercharging former president Trump's failed approach to domestic manufacturing.
The higher taxes on small businesses and entrepreneurs could slow growth. Less opportunity means more tribalism and division.
The president wants to redefine federally licensed gun dealers in service of an ineffective anti-crime strategy.
Plus: The editors recommend the best books for sparking interest in free market principles.
Even as the president bemoans the injustice of pot prohibition, his administration insists that cannabis consumers have no right to arms.
The ruling has significant shortcomings and may be overruled on appeal. The Biden Administration's position in this litigation is wrong for much the same reasons as the Trump Administration was wrong to target immigration sanctuaries.
What we did for Ukrainians, we could do for other migrants too.
Big corporations and entire industries constantly use their connections in Congress to get favors, no matter which party is in power.
Biden is set to propose a new tax on unrealized investment gains and to quadruple a recently imposed tax on stock buybacks.
When politicians manipulate industry, the public pays the price.
The president and his predecessor both tried to impose gun control by executive fiat.
DeSantis' foreign policy seems to be defined by a simple rule: Whatever Democrats do is wrong, but whatever Republicans do is right.
In rebuking the legislation, the president showed that he may not know what's in it.
Both parties are complicit in the lethal policies that gave us fentanyl disguised as Percocet.
But it's exactly what they need to start talking about.
Politicians say they want to subsidize various industries, but they sabotage themselves by weighing the policies down with rules that have nothing to do with the plans.
Mark Brnovich left office without issuing a final report, according to documents released by his successor.
The justices seem to be clearly leaning against the Biden Administration on the merits. The procedural issue of standing is a closer call, though ultimately more likely than not to come out the same way.
The Supreme Court considers the scope of presidential power in Biden v. Nebraska and Department of Education v. Brown.
It's less bad than Trump-era efforts along the same lines. But saying that is damning with faint praise.
Plus: Texas prosecutors can't criminally charge people who help others access out-of-state abortions, food trucks fight rules banning them in 96 percent of North Carolina city, and more...
A compilation of my work on this topic, on the one-year anniversary of the start of Vladimir Putin's attempt to conquer Ukraine.
After one year, whatever morale boost Biden’s visit provided won’t necessarily have concrete, strategic effects in Ukraine.
"If it was an emergency, why wait three years to provide the forgiveness? Why present it in a political framework, as fulfilling a campaign promise?" said one higher education expert.
Many Democrats and Republicans were outraged when Trump and Biden respectively were found with classified documents. But both sides are missing the point.
Like his predecessors, the current president ignores the law when it suits him.
Plus: the editors field a listener question on intellectual property.
The article explains the broader issues at stake in these cases, and why the Court would do well to rule against the administration.
Plus: The National Endowment for Democracy ends funding of conservative media blacklist, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear major internet free speech case, and more...
The move makes it more likely that Title 42 expulsions of migrants will end in the near future.
Most independent contractors don’t want the PRO Act anyway.
As legislators refuse to act, benefits will be cut without any possibility of sheltering those seniors who are poor.
The president reaped political benefits with his pre-election proclamation but has yet to follow through.
The old-age entitlement is unsustainable, unfair, and unnecessary. Replace it with something that helps the needy of any age.
Election betting markets are often more reliable than pundits. Did the site steal user funds? No. Did they lie to people? No. Harm anyone? No.
Plus: a listener question on prohibition and a lightning round on the editors' favorite Super Bowl moments
Denuclearization is not possible at any remotely acceptable price, and that may not change for decades to come.
By raising the effective tax rate on capital gains, the proposal would reduce U.S. saving, discourage entrepreneurship, and decrease economic output.
And increase total health care costs to boot.
Instead of empowering the government to intervene, we should look more holistically at the experience of young people online.
Legal scholar Michael Dorf claims Supreme Court should rule on this basis. But the doctrine doesn't apply to this case, and is dubious anyway.
As Biden mentioned fentanyl deaths in his State of the Union address, Republicans called on him to close the border. But "open borders" aren't to blame for overdoses.
If so, Title 42 expulsions might finally end. But it's not a done deal yet.
During the State of the Union, Biden claimed that "children who go to preschool are nearly 50 percent more likely to finish high school and go on to earn a two- or four-year degree," but evidence in favor of universal pre-k programs is lacking.
Biden's speech offered plenty of opportunity to present a counter-narrative to continued taxes and spending. Instead Sanders went a different direction.
To reduce cancer deaths, Biden should stop restricting safer nicotine alternatives.
The bipartisan (if shouty!) embrace of big-government nationalism ensures our populist moment won't end any time soon.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10