States Can Provide Their Own Civil Remedies for Police Abuse
They need not wait for the Supreme Court or Congress to restrict or abolish qualified immunity.
They need not wait for the Supreme Court or Congress to restrict or abolish qualified immunity.
An independent panel concludes there was no legal justification for stopping, frisking, arresting, or assaulting McClain.
What to expect from Joe Biden’s pick for attorney general.
A bill approved by the state House would let people sue government officials for violating rights protected by the state constitution.
The appeals court concluded that the officers' use of force was reasonable in the circumstances.
Does the Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizures include the right to be free from an unreasonable attempted seizure?
The former attorney general reportedly nixed a plea deal that involved a sentence of more than 10 years but would have precluded a federal prosecution.
Fourth Amendment advocates prevail in Wingate v. Fulford.
A state law eliminated qualified immunity as a defense for abusive officers.
A new case tests the limits of the “community caretaking exception” to the Fourth Amendment.
The families of Dennis Tuttle and Rhogena Nicholas say the city's policies and practices invited Fourth Amendment violations.
After breaking into Tuttle's home with no legal justification, police killed his dog and his wife.
A federal court said it did not violate her Fourth Amendment rights.
So far a dozen narcotics officers have been charged as a result of the investigation triggered by the disastrous operation.
A Connecticut law that made it easier to sue abusive cops is not expected to have a noticeable effect on municipal insurance costs.
Justice Clint Bolick dissents in Arizona v. Mixton.
Louisville's police chief wants to fire an officer who shot Taylor and a detective who "lied" in the search warrant affidavit.
Don’t expand the “hot pursuit” exception to the Fourth Amendment.
Chicago went to court to try and block a local news station from airing the body camera footage.
This holiday season, police should give citizens the gift of just leaving them in peace.
Government bullies empowered by civil forfeiture laws often back down, but only when their victims can afford a fight.
The DEA dropped its attempt to keep the money roughly two months after the woman joined a class-action lawsuit challenging cash seizures at airports.
According to the government, a law aimed at helping victims like King prevents him from holding his assailants accountable.
The federal government wants the Supreme Court to rule that the victim has no recourse.
The Supreme Court weighs police shootings and unreasonable seizures in Torres v. Madrid.
The state legislature is considering reforms in response to the use of dogs against cooperative suspects.
Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron said "the grand jury agreed" that indicting the two officers who shot Taylor was inappropriate.
In several cases, the Supreme Court nominee voted to allow civil rights lawsuits against officers accused of misconduct.
The detective who obtained the search warrant cited the deliveries to falsely implicate Taylor in drug trafficking.
Despite the city's stubborn resistance, a judge will finally consider the family's request to depose police supervisors.
Drug warriors gratuitously created the chaotic situation that state prosecutors say justified the use of deadly force.
The 7th Circuit judge’s track record suggests she would frequently be a friend of civil liberties.
The hail of bullets that killed her can be justified only in a country that uses violence to enforce politicians' pharmacological prejudices.
The case is an encouraging sign that the SCOTUS contender is not the sort of judge who bends over backward to shield cops from liability for outrageous misconduct.
While the 7th Circuit judge is often skeptical of the government's position, some of her conclusions will give pause to civil libertarians.
The agreement also includes several reforms aimed at preventing reckless drug raids based on dubious evidence.
The 5th Circuit judge is a mixed bag from a libertarian perspective.
A federal appeals court concludes that the agency's mass collection of phone records was illegal and probably unconstitutional.
The lawsuit argues that the DEA is violating the Fourth Amendment by seizing money from travelers without evidence of criminal activity.
This is the 10th lawsuit in the past few years accusing Chicago police of terrorizing families because of sloppy, outdated search warrants.
The overlap suggests a pattern of shoddy investigation and reckless paramilitary tactics in Louisville.
Trying to distract attention from the deadly corruption in his own department, Art Acevedo demands "action at the national level."
His wrists were too small for the cuffs, though.
Like other innocent owners, Manni Munir finds that fighting a civil forfeiture can cost more than the property is worth.
The charges, which grew out of a lethal 2019 raid based on a fraudulent search warrant affidavit, suggest that cops routinely built their cases on lies.
The State asked the court to impose "(1) a requirement that officers identify themselves and their agency before arresting or detaining any person; (2) a requirement that officers explain to any person being seized that he or she is being arrested or detained; and (3) an enjoinder against arrests that lack probable cause."
The president’s heavy-handed response to protests against police brutality belies his promise of "law and order."
The decision vividly illustrates how the doctrine shields police from accountability for using excessive force.