Corporations and the First Amendment: Free Speech Rules (Episode 6)
Episode 6 of Free Speech Rules, from UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh
Episode 6 of Free Speech Rules, from UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh
Kerri Owens' firing from her job at Allen High School may well be a First Amendment violation.
Conservatives who argue that the video platform is constrained by the First Amendment are forsaking their constitutional principles.
It flies in the face of precedent.
The state attempted to recall the vanity plate on the grounds that it referenced "excretory acts or functions."
The same First Amendment principles that apply to the president also apply to the congresswoman.
Even as the senator calls Donald Trump a press-bullying authoritarian, he threatens press freedom in the name of preserving "independent" media.
By punishing Jeff Klinzman, Kirkwood Community College has dealt a blow to free speech.
"Joke or not, these types of comments are felonies under the law," says the Volusia County Sheriff's Office
The Democratic presidential contender suggests that "racist threats or anti-immigrant manifestos" could justify federal gun confiscation orders.
The nation's leading scholar of mass shootings explains how media coverage of horrific events such as El Paso and Dayton stoke unwarranted fear and anxiety.
The constitutional amendment they support, like the president’s plan to regulate social media, trusts the government to moderate our political debate.
The Democracy for All Amendment aims to mute some voices so that others can be heard.
It would essentially be a Fairness Doctrine for the internet.
Liability safe harbors for Internet intermediaries are not responsible for Internet "hate speech"
Plus: Marijuana banking, suing Facebook, and more...
Owners painted the house bright pink and added two funny emojis after neighbors complained about illegal Airbnb rentals.
Plus: 8chan called before Congress, data privacy bill hits a snag, and more...
Plus: the budget deal, GOP retirements, and the latest front in the trade war.
The suit came after the school denied funding to bring Dana Loesch and Andrew Klavan to campus.
Plus: Behind the bipartisan war on internet speech, New York "decriminalizes" pot (but you'll still get fined), and more...
While the teenager has a legitimate beef about coverage of his encounter with Native American activist Nathan Phillips, that doesn't mean he has a legal cause of action.
From Josh Hawley to Kamala Harris, online free speech is under attack.
The presidential hopeful alleges the company violated her First Amendment rights when it suspended her campaign advertising site for 6 hours.
Superior Court Judge Rochelle East says the warrant violated California law.
Donald Trump is far from the only person who doesn't understand the Bill of Rights.
No diploma, no making money telling people how to eat better.
The pundit made the claim at a Senate hearing on allegations of tech censorship against conservatives.
The late Supreme Court justice was an inconsistent defender of civil liberties.
Trump supports a bill that would encourage censorship in the name of free speech.
The law is an ass, cleft and all.
Aggressive asset forfeiture collides with First Amendment rights.
The president invited Republican lawmakers as well as social media stars who claim that tech giants are suppressing free speech.
The New York congresswoman's use of Twitter seems similar to the president's in constitutionally relevant ways.
New Orleans can't use zoning regulations to decide what counts as artistic expression.
The court says the "interactive space" created by his account is a public forum, meaning that the president's viewpoint discrimination violates the First Amendment.
HBO documentary explores teen’s culpability in boyfriend’s suicide.
Nicole Prause and Donald Hilton, longtime opponents on the subject of pornography, are now facing off in court.
The state's Liquor and Cannabis Board changed its policy after Hempfest and two marijuana retailers challenged it on constitutional grounds.
The government's latest moral crusade shields traffickers, empowers pimps, and undermines free speech online.
That result "may strike some as unfair," the court says, but it's what state law required at the time.
A 6-3 ruling says that the First Amendment protects brand names that are considered “immoral” or “scandalous.”
A local bakery accused the college of defamation after students launched a public campaign against the store for racial profiling. Oberlin mounted a free speech defense.
Hawley is selling it as a way to fight tech-company "bias" against Republicans. Don't believe him.
In a letter to Dame explaining why the ads had been rejected, the MTA cited longstanding rules against ads "promoting a sexually oriented business."
The president's spokeswoman is doing what she has always done on TV, unencumbered by the legal distinction between partisan pundit and executive branch employee.
Nancy Pelosi's overwrought take on Donald Trump's receptiveness to "oppo research" is hard to take seriously.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks