Trump's Troops Return to a City That Moved On: Dispatch From Portland
Five years after the city’s fiery 2020 protests, Portland is mostly calm. That hasn’t stopped Trump from reviving old battles, fueled by false memories and made-for-TV outrage.
Five years after the city’s fiery 2020 protests, Portland is mostly calm. That hasn’t stopped Trump from reviving old battles, fueled by false memories and made-for-TV outrage.
This is the second appellate court ruling against the order. So far, every court that has addressed this issue has ruled the same way.
The case was filed yesterday by a broad coalition of different groups, including a health care provider, education groups, religious organizations, and labor unions.
The president thinks he can transform murder into self-defense by executive fiat.
It will review a panel decision holding that Trump could not invoke this sweeping wartime authority by claiming illegal migration and drug smuggling qualify as an "invasion."
Pfizer wins big in Trump’s new drug discount gimmick.
When the state dictates both the questions science asks and the answers it offers, it converts knowledge into propaganda and health into a matter of politics.
Which version of the chief justice will emerge in the Supreme Court’s newest term?
Judge William Young wrote a book-length order attacking “the problem this President has with the First Amendment.”
The president’s movie tariff proposal faces several legal and logistical challenges to implementation.
Refusing to fund the government is the primary way minority party lawmakers can check the excesses of the executive branch and the majority party.
The prominent originalist legal scholar argues the Constitution does not require that the president have the power to fire executive branch officials.
Plus: Addressing "the enemy within," the FTC's pointless meddling, Joy Reid finally understands half the country, and more...
The legal rationales for prosecuting James Comey, Adam Schiff, and Letitia James suggest the president is determined to punish them one way or another.
The decision is the most thorough in a line of recent court decisions reaching similar results.
The Department of Homeland Security will retain 95 percent of its employees if the government shuts down and remain funded in large part by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
As ever, be cautious about what you hear from the Department of Health and Human Services.
Plus: Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote a book.
Trump exempted imported chips from his reciprocal tariffs in April. Now he's threatening them with 100 percent rates.
The order lists "anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christianity" as common threads among "domestic terrorists," though all are protected by the First Amendment.
The administration is pursuing a vendetta, but Comey and the FBI deserve scrutiny and reduced stature.
By demanding that the Justice Department punish the former FBI director for wronging him, the president provided evidence to support a claim of selective or vindictive prosecution.
The FBI director's portrayal of the case exemplifies the emptiness of his promise that there would be "no retributive actions" against the president's enemies.
Trump railed against migrant crime abroad but skipped U.S. stats—because immigrants here are locked up far less often than native-born Americans.
There is ample evidence to suspect prosecutors are just doing President Trump's dirty work rather than following the facts of the case.
There’s an opportunity to abandon bad policies that raise consumer costs and move toward free trade.
Democrats are vowing to break up media companies that kowtowed to Trump if they take back power.
From the Fairness Doctrine to Nixon’s “raised eyebrow,” government licensing power has long chilled broadcast speech—proving the First Amendment should apply fully to the airwaves.
Peter Thiel warns of a pending one-world totalitarian government—while himself pushing to supercharge the surveillance state.
The Supreme Court will soon review the president’s authority to fire “independent” agency heads.
Another in a long line of court decisions striking down Trump efforts to attach conditions to federal grants that were not approved by Congress.
In her new book, 107 Days, the former vice president reminds us that she is ever the prosecutor.
Forcing the sale of a social media company for political reasons was always going to be a power grab for the White House—whether its occupant was Democratic or Republican.
Plus: Spyware intercepted, gender desistance findings, trad discourse on those pesky working women, and more...
Nobody should be governed by people who despise them.
History suggests that Republicans will regret letting the FCC police TV programming.
Lawsuits against Oregon and Maine test how far the federal government can go in demanding access to voter information.
Speeches by the president, Stephen Miller, and Tucker Carlson will accelerate dislike of the president’s agenda.
The president’s attempt to evade the major questions doctrine deserves to be rejected.
Legal scholar Steve Vladeck explains how and why.
Mike Waltz is no longer national security adviser, but his plans for Bagram Air Base seem to have stuck in the president's head.
The First Amendment still stands, but the culture that supports it is eroding.
The plan violates the relevant visa law. If allowed to stand, it would significantly harm productivity and innovation.
Rand Paul concurs that the threats preceding the comedian's suspension were "absolutely inappropriate" because the agency has "no business weighing in on this."
A quiet push to declare “no safe level” of drinking has officially fizzled.
And Trump's much more extreme one. [EV writes: I bumped this post from yesterday, because it struck me as especially timely and substantively valuable.]
Trump struggles to articulate any foreign policy view with much coherence, and has a fragile ego that makes world conflicts all about him.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks