CNN Panelist Claims That Donald Trump Caused Charlottesville Attack
The punch line: It was a panel on the dangers of misinformation.
The punch line: It was a panel on the dangers of misinformation.
Regulating AI could threaten free speech, just as earlier proposed regulations of other media once did.
Someone did allegedly threaten first responders, but the panic may have done more damage.
The broad ban on AI-generated political content is clearly an affront to the First Amendment.
Seven congressional Democrats called on the FEC to stop deepfakes. But is there really much to worry about?
Uncle Sam is resorting to some unusual methods to support the Israeli war effort.
Plus: RFK Jr. thrown off the N.Y. ballot, Ukraine advances into Russia, and more...
Nina Jankowicz finds out the truth may hurt, but it isn’t lawsuit bait.
Washington keeps getting caught pushing the kind of disinformation it claims to oppose.
Half the country says suppressing “false information” is more important than press freedom.
The American Sunlight Project contends that researchers are being silenced by their critics.
Fight back through better information and discourse, not by empowering the government.
And they're still trying to censor speech on social media.
The newspaper portrays the constitutional challenge to the government's social media meddling as a conspiracy by Donald Trump's supporters.
From limits on liability protections for websites to attempts to regulate the internet like a public utility, these proposals will erode Americans' right to express themselves.
Where are the misinformation czars and the mainstream media fact-checkers now?
Your support makes some of the "riskiest" journalism on the internet possible.
A tricky, excellent legal drama shows just how hard it can be to pin down the truth.
Aside from narrowly defined exceptions, false speech is protected by the First Amendment.
The late California senator always seemed to err on the side of more government power and less individual freedom.
Yoel Roth worries about government meddling in content moderation, except when Democrats target "misinformation."
The appeals court narrowed a preliminary injunction against such meddling but confirmed the threat that it poses to freedom of speech.
The paper worries that "social media companies are receding from their role as watchdogs against political misinformation."
Humanity has always adjusted to the reliability of new information sources.
A new documentary film argues that the second-largest website on the planet is flooded with misinformation. Is that right?
"Disinformation" researchers alarmed by the injunction against government meddling with social media content admire legal regimes that allow broad speech restrictions.
Confirmation of Wuhan scientists as "patients zero" makes the lab leak theory look likely—and the misinformation police look like fools.
"We find that while removing this content does curb some misinformation, it could also have the unintended effect of curtailing political speech."
From Russiagate to COVID discourse, elites in government and the media are trying to control and centralize free speech and open inquiry.
Join Reason on YouTube Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern for a discussion of Jacob Siegel's broadside against the "counter-disinformation complex" in Tablet magazine.
Plus: More secrecy from the Global Disinformation Index, the public awaits another big Supreme Court abortion decision, and more...
The COVID-19 lab leak theory was labeled "misinformation." Now it's the most plausible explanation.
The legal challenge to censorship by proxy highlights covert government manipulation of online speech.
The Ohio train accident was frightening enough. Spreading inaccurate information won’t help the citizens of East Palestine.
Time and time again, so-called disinformation watchdogs fail their own tests—the lab leak is just the latest example.
The push to label the lab leak thesis a racist conspiracy theory now looks even more foolish.
Plus: The National Endowment for Democracy ends funding of conservative media blacklist, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear major internet free speech case, and more...
A government-supported organization's controversial ratings of online news sources illustrate the challenge of deciding what qualifies as disinformation.
Reason is listed among the "ten riskiest online news outlets" by a government-funded disinfo tracker.
Alarmists are unfazed by the lack of evidence that "foreign influence campaigns" have affected public opinion or voting behavior.
Deepfakes aren't nearly as dangerous as the tried-and-true technique of saying something misleading with the imprimatur of authority.
Plus: House votes to rescind IRS funding, the FDA is putting unnecessary strings on pharmacies filling abortion pill prescriptions, and more...
People in power lean on private businesses to impose authoritarian policies forbidden to the government.
Thanks, but we lived through the lies of their administrations that they used to sell us war and intrusive government meddling in health care.
Journalists who sound the alarm about Russian propaganda are unfazed by the lack of evidence that it has a meaningful impact.
Livestream with Nick Gillespie, Robby Soave, and Zach Weissmueller