Trump Indictment Could Be the Jolt His Flailing 2024 Campaign Needs
Plus: Evidence that social media causes teen health problems "isn't convincing," more states ban gender transition treatments for minors, and more...
Plus: Evidence that social media causes teen health problems "isn't convincing," more states ban gender transition treatments for minors, and more...
The 5th Circuit noted that such orders can be issued without any credible evidence of a threat to others.
The CFPB funding scheme is constitutional, the 2nd Circuit says.
James King is once again asking the high court to rule that two officers should not receive immunity for choking him unconscious and temporarily disfiguring his face.
The surprising recent rise in partisan, racial, and gender differences in circuit judges following earlier opinions.
The 11th Circuit panel refused to lift an injunction against the law.
The third parties think the new ballot restrictions meet no legitimate state interest besides guaranteeing Democrat and Republican hold on government.
Lawyers representing an allegedly duped Buffalo Wild Wings customer demand that the company disgorge its ill-gotten gains.
Opponents of the reforms favored by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition should acknowledge the threat posed by unconstrained majority rule.
Plus: College says abortion art runs afoul of state law, the politics of Silicon Valley Bank's collapse, and more...
A new report details how plea bargaining can hurt defendants and warps the justice system.
Criticism of public officials doesn't have to be polite, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court confirmed.
The trade association says the overbroad and vague A.B. 2273 places unconstitutional burdens on speech.
Michael Friend was arrested in 2018 for holding a sign that read "Cops Ahead" near a police checkpoint. That arrest violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights, a federal appeals court has ruled.
Bradley Bass' case in Colorado says a lot about just how powerful prosecutors are.
It's a threat to our fundamental rights, but courts refuse to change their approach.
Section 230 helped the internet flourish. Now its scope is under scrutiny.
"Today's decision is a victory for the First Amendment that should be celebrated by everyone who hopes to see the internet continue as a place where even difficult and contentious issues can be debated and discussed freely," said one attorney.
Election betting markets are often more reliable than pundits. Did the site steal user funds? No. Did they lie to people? No. Harm anyone? No.
Because legislators omitted a crucial letter, there is no straightforward way to downgrade convictions for offenses that are no longer felonies.
We may have finally discovered a limit to judicial immunity.
The U.S. Sentencing Commission might make medical neglect a qualifying condition for compassionate release.
"In short, the controlling motivations for the suspension were the interest in bringing down a reform prosecutor," the judge wrote.
Justice Thomas' footprints are all over the Court's recently concluded term.
Justice Richard Bernstein said Pete Martel's hiring as clerk was unacceptable because "I'm intensely pro-law enforcement."
Defendants say this practice violates the state’s own laws. The attorney general is pushing onward anyway.
Plus: spending bill on its way to Biden, Don't Be a Feminist reviewed, lawsuit over Yesterday trailer can go forward, and more...
The weird judge-invented "commercial speech" exception to our right to free expression breeds strange results in suit against distributors of the 2019 movie Yesterday.
By giving powerful law enforcement officials absolute immunity from civil liability, the Supreme Court leaves their victims with no recourse.
The state high court rules against the Education Opportunity Act.
Bradley Bass is facing 12 years in prison, despite the fact that he was doing his job as a school administrator.
The Supreme Court said in 1942 that local activity, not just interstate activity, was subject to congressional regulation.
Alvin Bragg has finally moved to stop prosecuting Tracy McCarter for murder.
The link between Bostock v. Clayton County and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina
The judge granted the Biden administration a stay, which will keep the policy in place through late December.
The Supreme Court grapples with the original meaning of the 14th Amendment in Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina.
In the event of prosecution, jury nullification allows regular people to exercise a veto over the power of the state.
This is bad news for any virtual currency that was pre-mined, including ethereum.
No one is confused about whether Tofurky is turkey.
It’s a little thing, but thousands of people end up in jail over these types of avoidable technical violations.
Priscilla Villarreal found herself in a jail cell for publishing two routine stories. A federal court still can't decide what to do about that.
In the two cases, brought against Harvard and the University of North Carolina, anti-affirmative action group Students for Fair Admissions argues that race-conscious admissions violate the Civil Rights Act
A highway engineer got qualified immunity for detaining drivers—despite not being a cop.
Convincing evidence of his innocence has been available for years. But the criminal legal system prioritizes procedure and bureaucracy over liberty.
The Supreme Court may soon consider if acquitted conduct sentencing is illegal.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10