The Court Swims in Political Seas
Constitutional law is made by a politically constructed institution
Constitutional law is made by a politically constructed institution
Jamelle Bouie's counterintuitive recommendation would effectively eliminate constitutional limits on elected officials, including Trump and every demagogue who follows him.
An awful lot, but who's counting?
More often than you might think
Depends on who you ask.
A new history of how the U,.S. Supreme Court has defined and enforced the limits of congressional power
From today's opinion by Justice Thomas, for the five more conservative members of the Court, in Franchise Tax Board v. Hyatt.
"First trimester abortions, which typically require only medication, do not require the onsite presence of a licensed physician."
Following a Reason investigation into Chicago's punitive vehicle impound program, a new lawsuit alleges the practice violates Chicagoans constitutional rights.
Congress should fix its FGM statute—and all the other ones too.
O'Rourke has long been a critic of U.S. intervention abroad.
The ACLU wants the Supreme Court to revisit the notorious qualified immunity doctrine.
Both the libertarian-leaning Republican and the democratic socialist want Trump to withdraw U.S. troops from Syria.
It's wrong any way you slice it.
Revisiting their debate on judicial protection of economic liberty.
Q&A with the co-founder of Institute for Justice about immigration, his legal philosophy, his battles with Sheriff Joe Arpaio, and that tattoo.
Plus: Can sex workers ever trust Kamala Harris? Why do teens love Google Docs? And how is Tumblr faring without porn?
The nation's force mustered in service of the nation's will.
An essential distinction for understanding problems vexing the constitutional order
The alternatives suggested by defenders of the monument do not seem much better.
The challenge to a World War I memorial in Maryland illustrates the confusion caused by the Supreme Court's Establishment Clause cases.
It's an attempt to make an end-run around congressional spending authority.
Plus: Silicon Valley is suspicious of media, Cory Booker calls for weed reform, and how to understand the "upper middle class"
Plus: A judge says Jeffrey Epstein case was mishandled, and Andrea Dworkin is making a comeback.
Sex, publishing, and quasi-legal theft collide in the Backpage prosecution.
Congress seems to have authorized this end run around its spending power. Can it do that?
Bargaining over policy is supposed to be frustrating. That's a feature, not a bug, of limited government.
My latest article on James Madison and constitutional practice, with some criticisms and related links
As the lawsuit against FOSTA hits appeals court, three essays about the law that everyone should read.
In a 5-4 decision, the Court issued a temporary stay of a Louisiana law that could put abortion doctors out of business.
Gun buyers, gay lovers, cannabis customers, and Yelp users are just a few of the groups that benefit from this federal law.
William Barr does not like legalization but says Congress has to resolve the "untenable" conflict between state and federal law.
Compelled use of facial and finger recognition features runs afoul of the Fifth Amendment.
Only if you like the cause they serve, according to supporters of laws that target the anti-Israel BDS movement
A ballot initiative that took effect this week bans sales to adults younger than 21.
Two brothers were arrested at a Giants-49ers game after cursing out and flipping off the Giants players. Now they're suing.
A federal lawsuit says the state is violating the Second Amendment by refusing to recognize the restoration of firearm rights by courts in other states.
Cops supposedly smelled 25 grams of pot inside a plastic container inside a safe inside a closet 30 feet from a guy's doorstep.
In a case SCOTUS will hear next month, victims of Tennessee's protectionism argue that it flouts the 14th Amendment as well as the Commerce Clause.
A federal court has struck down a New York ban inspired by kung fu movies.
The Supreme Court seems disinclined to overturn precedents allowing serial prosecutions of the same crime.
A 3rd Circuit judge says the decision approving New Jersey's 10-round limit treats the right to arms less seriously than other constitutional rights.
The Supreme Court should reconsider the misbegotten "dual sovereignty" doctrine.
The Supreme Court should make it clear that state forfeitures are constrained by the Excessive Fines Clause.
A federal judge overturns a state ban on telling customers they can bring their own beer or wine.
Constitutional law could be improved by taking account of the principle that "with great power, comes great responsibility."
Legal scholar Eric Segall argues originalism doesn't qualify as a constitutional theory because originalists disagree on too many things. His case is overstated. But if it's correct, the same criticism applies to living constitutionalism.
Why first principles suggest that Matthew Whitaker's acting appointment is invalid, but precedent and practice might suggest the opposite.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10