Are Boycotts Protected by the First Amendment?
Only if you like the cause they serve, according to supporters of laws that target the anti-Israel BDS movement
Only if you like the cause they serve, according to supporters of laws that target the anti-Israel BDS movement
A ballot initiative that took effect this week bans sales to adults younger than 21.
Two brothers were arrested at a Giants-49ers game after cursing out and flipping off the Giants players. Now they're suing.
A federal lawsuit says the state is violating the Second Amendment by refusing to recognize the restoration of firearm rights by courts in other states.
Cops supposedly smelled 25 grams of pot inside a plastic container inside a safe inside a closet 30 feet from a guy's doorstep.
In a case SCOTUS will hear next month, victims of Tennessee's protectionism argue that it flouts the 14th Amendment as well as the Commerce Clause.
A federal court has struck down a New York ban inspired by kung fu movies.
The Supreme Court seems disinclined to overturn precedents allowing serial prosecutions of the same crime.
A 3rd Circuit judge says the decision approving New Jersey's 10-round limit treats the right to arms less seriously than other constitutional rights.
The Supreme Court should reconsider the misbegotten "dual sovereignty" doctrine.
The Supreme Court should make it clear that state forfeitures are constrained by the Excessive Fines Clause.
A federal judge overturns a state ban on telling customers they can bring their own beer or wine.
Constitutional law could be improved by taking account of the principle that "with great power, comes great responsibility."
Legal scholar Eric Segall argues originalism doesn't qualify as a constitutional theory because originalists disagree on too many things. His case is overstated. But if it's correct, the same criticism applies to living constitutionalism.
Why first principles suggest that Matthew Whitaker's acting appointment is invalid, but precedent and practice might suggest the opposite.
Living constitutionalists argue that their methodology allows us to improve constitutional law over time. But what if it actually makes it worse? Legal scholar Ernest Young raises that very question in an important new article.
On Tuesday, voters in six states approved Crime Victims' Rights Amendments, continuing a long-term trend towards expanding the crime victim's role in the criminal justice process
Banning ballot selfies to stop voter fraud is like "burning down the house to roast the pig" said the First Circuit Court of Appeals. But many states still do it.
President Trump's hardline immigration stances have made for some polarizing debates.
The federal case against the Pittsburgh shooter is redundant and constitutionally questionable.
At least one Republican congressman agrees.
Plus: Southern border will see more troops than Iraq, Syria.
First thoughts on Jonathan Gienapp's The Second Creation: Fixing the American Constitution in the Founding Era
Progressives appreciate the separation of powers-up to a point.
Responses to my lead essay by legal scholars John Eastman and Gabriel Chin have now been posted, along with my rejoinders to them.
The 13th Amendment outlaws slavery, but not for prison inmates.
Plus: The Justice Department goes after "net neutrality" in California and SNL takes on Brett Kavanaugh.
Rosenstein was not happy with how Trump handled the James Comey firing.
The U.S. Constitution was signed on this day 231 years ago.
The lead essay on this month's Cato Unbound is my article outlining why the text and original meaning of the Constitution do not give the the federal government any general power to restrict immigration. There will be responses by critics, and ongoing discussion until October.
Harris and other Democrats distorted Kavanaugh's comments on birth control to portray him as a religious extremist.
The Supreme Court needs to have the power to overturn "settled" constitutional decisions in order to prevent the permanent entrenchment of terrible precedents.
The Massachusetts Democrat is grandstanding, but that doesn't mean she's wrong.
Parents of school shooting victims lash out over Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, but the more troubling responses are from U.S. senators.
Legal scholars are often accused of claiming that the Constitution fits their political views. Here are several important issues where it doesn't fit mine.
Efforts on both right and left to make the democracy-promotion the key focus of constitutional law should be rejected.
The National Constitution Center summarizes contributions to the ongoing debate over the constitutionality of the Space Force - including a new Congressional Research Service report on the subject.
Critics say the "red flag" law is violating Floridians' constitutional rights.
The libertarian legal scholar explains the post-Bork landscape and what might derail Trump's high-court pick.
A new paper on an old way of resolving constitutional indeterminacies
Unlike the man who nominated him, Brett Kavanaugh understands the importance of an independent judiciary.
Like Neil Gorsuch, the D.C. Circuit judge has criticized Chevron deference for encouraging executive arrogance.
The D.C. Circuit judge is a strong defender of the Second Amendment but seems less inclined to accept Fourth Amendment claims.
Contrary to what his critics say, this "narrow-minded elitist" stands up for the little guy.
The Constitution and the Declaration of Independence have helped keep us mostly free.
"[A]s applied to indigent drivers, the law is not merely ineffective; it is powerfully counterproductive."
What we should celebrate on Independence Day.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10