Congress Does Not Come Back With a Warrant
Plus: A listener asks the editors for examples of tasks the government does well (yikes).
In this week's The Reason Roundtable, editors Matt Welch, Katherine Mangu-Ward, Nick Gillespie, and Peter Suderman contextualize Iran's retaliatory strike against Israel before bemoaning the recent vote in Congress on the renewal of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).
02:20 - Iran's retaliatory strike on Israel
13:05 - House votes to reauthorize Section 702 of FISA.
29:21 - Weekly Listener Question
42:00 - Arizona Supreme Court rules on law that would ban nearly all abortions.
47:23 - This week's cultural recommendations
Mentioned in this podcast:
"Iran Attacks Israel," by Liz Wolfe
"Biden Sends U.S. Forces To Protect Israel's Borders for the First Time Ever," by Matthew Petti
"What's the Root Cause of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict?" by Eli Lake and Jeremy Hammond
"After Hamas Attack, There Are No Good Options in the Middle East," by Matt Welch, Katherine Mangu-Ward, Nick Gillespie, and Peter Suderman
"The Iranian Coup that Led to 67 Years of Reckless Intervention," by Nick Gillespie
"Come Back With a Warrant," by Eric Boehm
"Biden Hints at Freedom for Julian Assange," by J.D. Tuccille
"Edward Snowden: The Individual Is More Powerful Today Than Ever Before," by Nick Gillespie
"'Selective Surveillance Outrage' and 'Situational Libertarianism' Isn't Good Enough, Congress!" by Nick Gillespie
"Why We Get the Police State We Deserve—and What We Can Do to Fix That," by Nick Gillespie
"Supreme Court Says Officials Who Block Critics on Social Media Might Be Violating the First Amendment," by Jacob Sullum
"Everyone Agrees Government Is a Hot Mess. So Why Does It Keep Getting Bigger Anyway?" by Nick Gillespie
"In Defense of Roe" by Nick Gillespie
"Abortion & Libertarianism: Nick Gillespie, Ronald Bailey, Mollie Hemingway, & Katherine Mangu-Ward"
"Trump's Abortion Stance Is Convenient, but That Does Not Mean He's Wrong," by Jacob Sullum
"What Leaving Abortion Up to the States Really Means," by Elizabeth Nolan Brown
"William F. Buckley, RIP," by Jacob Sullum
"Radical Squares," by Nick Gillespie
"FDR: A One-Man Show," by Chris Elliott
"The Big Guy's Last Drink," by Peter Suderman
The Libertarian Moment, UFC300 edition (Renato Moicano invokes Mises)
Send your questions to roundtable@reason.com. Be sure to include your social media handle and the correct pronunciation of your name.
Today's sponsor:
- What's the first thing you'd do if you had an extra hour in your day? A lot of us spend our lives wishing we had more time. The question is, time for what? If time was unlimited, how would you use it? The best way to squeeze that special thing into your schedule is to know what's important to you, and make it a priority. Therapy can help you find what matters to you, so you can do more of it. If you're thinking of starting therapy, give BetterHelp a try. It's entirely online. Designed to be convenient, flexible, and suited to your schedule. Just fill out a brief questionnaire to get matched with a licensed therapist, and switch therapists any time for no additional charge. Learn to make time for what makes you happy, with BetterHelp. Visit BetterHelp.com/roundtable today to get 10 percent off your first month.
Audio production by Ian Keyser
Assistant production by Hunt Beaty
Music: "Angeline," by The Brothers Steve
- Producer: Hunt Beaty
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The goverment is really good at:
insider trading
Killing/imprisoning political dissadints if they don't support the globalists
Running cover for pedofiles
Running terrorist campaigns against its own people
Steeling money
All of these things will be defended by Reason if the right people are doing them.
Steeling money
[squints]
“Steeleing elections” + “Stealing money” = “Steeling money”
Maybe the best thing the government is good at is gathering an keeping records and statistics. Births, deaths, economic and employment and so on. We know their quality because Reason, the rest of the media and the private sector regularly refer to them and use them.
""Maybe the best thing the government is good at is gathering an keeping records ""
Then why do they fail so many audits?
"Then why do they fail so many audits?"
Americans are very lax when it comes to demanding accountability from government officials. At least we can console ourselves that auditors are willing to do their job honestly and fail the audits they find lacking.
The one thing the government is good at is lying to you.
The reporters in this podcast, those who asked the question, routinely use statistics from the government. What's the population of the US? Where did you get that figure? Does it differ from the figure the government publishes? Government statistics gathering is even mentioned in the constitution.
Plus: A listener asks the editors for examples of tasks the government does well (yikes).
See, that's the thing. The government does way too much and nearly all of it, it does badly. Frankly, I think it is the poor service that is driving much of the discontent with government, more so than anger over the huge unwarranted scope of government.
For example, the government should not be in the train business. Train service should be privatized as of yesterday. But, imagine if the government provided train service that didn't suck? I think there would be a lot fewer people angry and upset at the government, because at least they would be thinking that they were getting something closer to the value that they expected from their tax money.
It is ironic - the government has it within its power to improve its image and reputation (non-coercively) by actually proving to taxpayers that they are offering services of value. But they can't do that because they suck so bad.
And they suck so bad because they have no incentive to actually improve. The people in high positions are only concerned with reelection; the people who run the day to day don't benefit from improving.
I don't know that they actually COULD improve. I do know that there are plenty of people who want more government control, because they think it will be getting something for nothing.
Everything government touches turns to crap - Ringo Starr
He gets it.
""Congress Does Not Come Back With a Warrant""
Of course not. They did not want the Trump treatment from the IC.