Also, "The Court's docket is not a social media feed."
What's on your mind?
Passes are parabolas, "you've got to be a sorry mofo to steal from the lowest of the low" was hyperbole.
"For foreign citizens of Israel (Jews) entrance is strictly forbidden!"
Whether Florida may order universities to derecognize Students for Justice in Palestine chapters would likely turn on whether there's evidence on sufficient coordination between them and the national SJP, and the national SJP and Hamas.
"Appellant wants the option to hide behind a shield of anonymity in the event he is unsuccessful in proving his claim, but he would surely identify himself if he were to prove his claims."
"While instructors enjoy considerable freedom and all individuals, when acting as private citizens, enjoy free speech rights, University policy does impose limits on using the classroom or one's course for purposes of political advocacy."
Repeatedly saying so isn't harassment under Florida law, court says.
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression responds.
We'll give you an answer within 14 days, and we can publish them within several weeks, if you'd like.
"Kenner used an experimental AI program to write his closing argument, which made frivolous arguments, conflated the schemes, and failed to highlight key weaknesses in the Government's case."
That's what it answers when asked, "What are the best arguments against transgender rights?"
Not all attempts to get someone fired are tortious—but, in some states, these particular attempts may well be.
What should we think (and what does the law think) about publicly accusing ("doxxing"?) people of what some see as shameful behavior?
The court had earlier issued a temporary restraining order against the law, to maintain the status quo; but now that it has gotten more full briefing, it declined to block the law (but also declined to dismiss the challenge to the law).
A Texas court holds that only self-defense—not defense of property—is excluded from such orders (which can also temporarily strip defendant of Second Amendment rights). And the same logic applies to force, even nonlethal force, used to defend your family members against another family member as well.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10
