Cronyist Journalism Measure Could Prompt Facebook To Ban News
Plus: ACLU sides against religious freedom, abortions after Dobbs, and more...
Plus: ACLU sides against religious freedom, abortions after Dobbs, and more...
A Democratic member of Congress laments how Twitter handled the New York Post's reporting on Hunter Biden's laptop.
Plus: The editors consider a listener question on the involuntary hospitalization of the mentally ill.
"The state of New York can't turn bloggers into Big Brother, but it's trying to do just that," said FIRE attorney Daniel Ortner.
The Twitter Files are interesting but contain few true surprises. A mix of incompetence and partisanship got the site in trouble.
The "free speech absolutist" is maintaining some content restrictions while loosening others.
Plus: Freedom's Furies, SCOTUS to take up student loan forgiveness plan, and more...
It's a private company. Its owner can do what he chooses, even if it seems crazy.
At a dangerous moment for the free exchange of ideas, civil libertarians can tally a win.
Elon Musk's rescission of the platform's prior policy, which forbade dissent from official guidance, is consistent with his promise of lighter moderation.
Too many Western governments want to follow in the footsteps of authoritarians when it comes to tech privacy.
Mastodon might not be the future of decentralized social media, but it can’t hurt to check it out as Twitter implodes.
EU officials threaten to make their restrictive content rules a global standard.
Plus: Twitter is alive and well, the U.K. considers unprecedented tax hikes, and more...
Thanks, but we lived through the lies of their administrations that they used to sell us war and intrusive government meddling in health care.
Critics have said for years that Facebook is a monopoly that can only be killed by federal regulation. Meanwhile, the platform bleeds users, its stock price is plummeting, and it just announced its first-ever round of layoffs.
Plus: "you can't spoil what's already rotten," inflation stayed high in October, Election 2022 takeaways, and more...
If the bird site's new owner wants to protect free speech, he should focus on resisting government requests to remove content.
Journalists who sound the alarm about Russian propaganda are unfazed by the lack of evidence that it has a meaningful impact.
Priscilla Villarreal found herself in a jail cell for publishing two routine stories. A federal court still can't decide what to do about that.
Plus: Congress remains too cautious about marijuana, myths about independent contractors, and more...
In a post-FOSTA world, Section 230 still protects websites from lawsuits over criminal sexual conduct by their users.
On Tuesday, the senator erroneously claimed that "free speech does not include spreading misinformation."
Livestream with Nick Gillespie, Robby Soave, and Zach Weissmueller
Plus: Hate speech is free speech, tax gap is stable, and more...
Plus: For Halloween, the editors describe what scares them most about politics and government right now.
The Department of Homeland Security and the FBI regularly report misinformation and disinformation to tech companies for potential removal.
Plus: Charlottesville cracks down on city employee speech, judge dismisses "blackout challenge" lawsuit against TikTok, and more...
In his dismissal order, the judge cited Section 230, the law protecting websites from liability for user-generated content.
U.K. regulators shut down Meta/GIPHY deal in favor of their own “approved buyer.”
Plus: The editors consider Ye and social media, then field a question about the TARP bailouts during the 2008 fiscal crisis.
Despite acknowledging that "the costume issue is small," the Iredell-Statesville School Board is suggesting banning animal costumes in response to online rumors.
Two new studies say there's no evidence of political learning on social media, but it does increasingly teach us to hate our opponents.
"Sounds like a good reason to think twice about using PayPal," writes Eugene Volokh.
Plus: lawsuit targets Roblox and Discord, 24 million immigration cases in backlog, and more...
The podcast is a debate between legal scholar Brad Smith and myself.
Plus: Musk's Twitter purchase may be back on, global deflation may be looming, and more...
Regular people are not so terminally online.
A First Amendment case prompts The Onion to explain how parody works.
Does Section 230 shield YouTube from lawsuits about recommendations? Can Twitter be forced to pay damages over the terrorists it hasn’t banned?
The world’s politicians offer a friendly reception to attacks on free speech.
"Upon careful review, we determined this video is not violative of our Community Guidelines and have reinstated it," said a YouTube spokesperson.
The 6th Circuit ruled that qualified immunity prevented Anthony Novak from vindicating his First Amendment rights.
Who cares if it’s legal if it generates politically advantageous outrage and attention?
Reddit users are protesting Texas' H.B. 20, which forces social media platforms to host speech they find objectionable.
A crackdown on insults, hate speech, and misinformation punishes dissenters who express themselves in ways that offend government officials.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10