Biden's Infrastructure Bills Leave a Legacy of Big Spending and Little Payoff
The outgoing president's signature legislative achievements spent tens of billions of dollars with little to show.
The outgoing president's signature legislative achievements spent tens of billions of dollars with little to show.
The senior Republican FCC commissioner blames progressive politics, while lawmakers and telecom companies blame bureaucratic red tape.
These handouts will flow to businesses—often big and rich—for projects they would likely have taken on anyway.
Congress is being asked to borrow more money to fund broadband access and other pet projects. Only about $9 billion would be spent on natural disaster recovery efforts.
After five years without net neutrality rules, the fix for a problem that doesn’t exist is back.
Americans can decide for themselves where to live and which services they need or can do without.
How not to distribute federal funds
More than 90 percent of Americans already have access to high-speed internet.
Industrial policy is never as simple as it seems.
The Federal Communications Commission uses broadband coverage maps that are so severely flawed, states started shelling out to make their own.
A new GAO report finds that the government lacks a "national strategy with clear roles, goals, objectives, and performance measures."
It's one of the most expensive legislative packages in American history, but the $1.2 trillion bill will end up doing far less than it otherwise could have.
It is the equivalent of mandating that all new homes come with at least five bathrooms.
The bipartisan infrastructure deal that's expected to pass the Senate this week would spend $65 billion on broadband projects, including more than $40 billion for largely unnecessary municipal broadband efforts.
The Biden administration is manufacturing a market failure to justify spending $100 billion on municipal broadband and other government-run internet projects.
We already know how to affordably expand connectivity; government-run networks ain’t it.
Democrats never miss an opportunity to rail against big corporations. Yet they're eagerly subsidizing their big corporate friends.
Pai has focused on taking a market-based approach to regulating the nation's always-evolving telecommunications industry, with great success.
California's new law is a legal mess.
Expensive high-speed internet and job training won't transform Appalachia into "Silicon Holler."
How municipal broadband drains local taxpayers
The FCC is designed to protect incumbents, enrich politicians, and screw consumers, says economist Thomas Hazlett.
The Radio Act of 1927 has enjoyed a nice, long life. It's past time for a retirement party.
Potential pork projects hardest hit.
FCC votes to change the definition of 'broadband,' increasing the minimum speed required.
The president addresses a country that currently hates his political party by offering more big government.
They overcharge for access to rights of way, unless ISPs have clout
The government knows better than the service providers, right?
Why invest in fiber-optic if the feds are going to subsidize the competition?
FCC looks at new taxes to pay for expanding broadband access for five percent of the population.
Apparently the FCC thinks this is a problem it is supposed to fix.
Intelligence court likely ruled that loosened broadband market was beyond the reach of existing snooping rules
Deal will help adapt to increasing demand for data services on mobile platforms.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks