Profs. Peter Henderson, Tatsunori Hashimoto, and Mark Lemley, just published in our symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Speech; more articles from the symposium coming in the next few days.
Just published, in our symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Speech; more articles from the symposium coming in the next few days.
Just published, in our symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Speech; more articles from the symposium coming in the next few days.
"Is It a Platform? Is It a Search Engine? It's Chat GPT!," by Prof. Beatriz Botero Arcila, just published in our symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Speech; more articles from the symposium coming in the next few days.
by Prof Jon M. Garon, just published in our symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Speech; more articles from the symposium coming in the next few days.
by Prof. Nina Brown, just published in our symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Speech; more articles from the symposium coming in the next few days.
Humanity has always adjusted to the reliability of new information sources.
Just published, in our symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Speech; more articles from the symposium coming in the next few days.
Just published, in our symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Speech; more articles from the symposium coming in the next few days.
Between A.I. and TikTok, the actors and writers will be returning to a changed industry.
Plus: Few Americans support full abortion bans, a win for cryptocurrency in Ripple case, and more...
Plus: Teaching A.I. about the Fourth of July, and more...
Excerpts from a dialogue with ChatGPT
Americans are more afraid than excited about A.I. But these technologies offer far more to cheer than to fear.
"People are comparing A.I. to smartphones or the internet. I think it's much closer to the invention of fire or the wheel," says Flo Crivello.
When your business relies on volunteer moderators and user-generated content, angry denizens can threaten the whole enterprise.
Doomsayers have a long track record of being wrong.
As the company explains, pre-market licensing would delay—or even deny—our access to artificial intelligence's potential benefits.
Plus: Grand jury indicts Jack Teixeira, Congress pursues A.I. regulation, and more...
A new bill from Sens. Josh Hawley and Richard Blumenthal would stifle the promise of artificial intelligence.
It's no Orson Welles as Unicron, sadly. But I'll take it.
Projections of huge savings are making the rounds. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Plus: Age-verification laws threaten our First Amendment right to anonymity, New York bill would set minimum prices for nail services, and more...
The Missouri senator is once again pursuing misguided tech regulation.
The CEO of Open To Debate wants us to disagree more productively—especially when it comes to presidential debates.
A more flexible model of oversight avoids hyper-cautious top-down regulation and enables swifter access to the substantial benefits of safe A.I.
Is the A.I. breakthrough for real this time?
His licensing proposal would slow down A.I. innovation without really reducing A.I. risks.
If government officials and lawyers create a new legal framework for A.I.-generated content, society risks losing the potential benefits of the next tech revolution.
The co-creator of Skype says yes. The George Mason University economist says no.
Join Reason on YouTube Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern for a discussion with economist Robin Hanson and software developer and investor Jaan Tallinn about the call for an immediate pause on A.I. development.
Their last strike previewed the struggles of the streaming era. This one might be giving us an early taste of the age of artificial intelligence.
Meanwhile, content creators and corporations want copyright regulations for artificial intelligence.
Predictably, the machine-learning robot starts killing.
Federal A.I. regulation now will hinder progress, consumer choice, and market competition.
In one sequence, the Jerry Seinfeld stand-in stood onstage at a comedy club for minutes without saying a word.
A.I. won’t kill cooking. Instead, it’ll help people become more creative and efficient in the kitchen.
Plus: Debating whether GPT-4 actually understands language, U.S. immigration law stops a college basketball star from scoring, and more...
Plus: the terrible case for pausing A.I. innovation
Is an A.I. "foom" even possible?
For good and ill, human beings advance through trial and error. The same will be the case with A.I.
After launching, ChatGPT hit 1 million sign-ups much faster than Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter did.
Which sentence in this podcast was generated using A.I.?
The designer of China's Great Firewall sees new A.I. tech as a concern for public authorities.
