Did Cassidy Hutchinson's Testimony Clinch the Incitement Case Against Trump?
The former president's recklessness is beyond dispute, but that is not enough to convict him while respecting the First Amendment.
The former president's recklessness is beyond dispute, but that is not enough to convict him while respecting the First Amendment.
Understanding what Justice Alito got wrong in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
“My retirement from active service,” Breyer told the president, “will be effective on Thursday, June 30, 2022, at noon.”
There are only two argued cases left for decision -- the last two to be decided with Justice Breyer on the Court.
National legislation and extraterritorial application of state laws are inconsistent with the local leeway that the Constitution protects.
The conservative Supreme Court justice is wrong about economic liberty and the Constitution.
Anti-discrimination law was pioneered by the political left. But, in recent years, conservatives have increasingly tried to use it for their own purposes.
Members of Congress keep saying they want to allow state-legal pot businesses to have access to the banking system, but they keep refusing to actually do it.
McMullin ran a third-party campaign for president in 2016.
Somerville still has costly regulations on the books even though New Jersey has legalized the sale of home-baked items.
A 6–3 majority sees it as noncoercive and not a violation of the Establishment Clause.
[I originally erred in posting this, which kept comments from being available; I've therefore deleted the original and reposted it.]
The article explains why the Supreme Court was right to hold that state voucher programs can’t discriminate against “sectarian” religious schools and addresses various objections.
In his Dobbs concurrence, the senior associate justice reiterates his outlying views on precedent and his belief that all substantive due process decisions were "demonstrably erroneous."
The other justices declined to join him, but the future of the Supreme Court rulings on those matters remains unclear.
The Constitution protects many more rights than it mentions, as James Madison explained.
Most states are unlikely to enact bans, but 22 either have them already or probably will soon.
are attitude-altering slippery slopes good or bad?
Colorado law says that ordinarily the decision is in favor of the person who doesn't want the embryos implanted; the Colorado Court of Appeals held that this applies even when the person has religious reasons for wanting to donate them to another couple.
The inconvenient truth behind all the COVID-19 relief fraud and waste is that these government programs never should have been designed as they were.
“Properly interpreted, the Second Amendment allows a ‘variety’ of gun regulations,” Kavanaugh writes, invoking Antonin Scalia
A 6–3 ruling undermines attempts to hold police accountable for misconduct.
“Nothing in the Second Amendment’s text draws a home/public distinction with respect to the right to keep and bear arms,” says New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.
The Supreme Court justice is wrong when he says abortion rights aren't deeply rooted in American history.
Prominent Democrats including Joe Manchin oppose a bad idea whose time has seemingly not yet come.
The legislation prohibits firearm sales based on juvenile records and subsidizes state laws that suspend gun rights without due process.
“A State violates the Free Exercise Clause when it excludes religious observers from otherwise available public benefits,” the Supreme Court held.
Environmental Protection Agency
No matter how the Supreme Court rules in West Virginia v. EPA, absent legislative action it is unlikely new power plant rules will be in force before 2024.
The decision is an important victory for both the principle of nondiscrimination and parents and students seeking better educational opportunities.
A new paper reveals that the state and local bailout was not only unnecessary but incredibly wasteful.
According to Alito, Gorsuch’s opinion “veered off into fantasy land.”
The defendant is one Rovier Carrington, who "sued Hollywood executives alleging that the executives had sexually assaulted him, and that they had defrauded him in connection with a decision to refuse to produce [his] reality television program."
States may not "exclude some members of the community from an otherwise generally available public benefit because of their religious exercise,” says SCOTUS.
except for the training of the clergy, holds the Supreme Court.