I'm a Gamer. The NO FAKES Act Could Get Me in Trouble.
A bill meant to fight AI deepfakes could devastate creativity in games like Fallout: New Vegas, Skyrim, and Minecraft, where mods keep old titles alive.
A bill meant to fight AI deepfakes could devastate creativity in games like Fallout: New Vegas, Skyrim, and Minecraft, where mods keep old titles alive.
Minnesota's proposed firearm restrictions raise serious constitutional questions—and offer little in return.
Tens of thousands of people die each year in crashes where human error was the cause or a contributing factor.
"Whether a case cite is obtained from a law review article, a hornbook, or through independent legal research, the duty to ensure that any case cited to a court is "good law" is nearly as old as the practice of law."
There is no hard evidence of Gmail discriminating against Republican campaign emails, but that’s no matter to the FTC Chairman.
Justice Kavanaugh on what to call the "shadow docket" now that it is no longer in the shadows.
Killing suspected drug traffickers is both unjust and illegal. And it could be the start of an effort to turn the already awful War on Drugs into something more like a real war, thereby making it even worse.
The ban's supporters, whose motivation is plainly protectionist, claim they are defending freedom by restricting it.
Over the past two decades, scores of business owners across the nation have sought to refuse services for same-sex weddings, an SMU Law School study finds
Plus: A momentous date in the life of Frederick Douglass
The 2-1 ruling is in line with most previous court decisions on Trump's invocation of the AEA. Judge Oldham wrote an extremely long, but significantly flawed, dissent.
The appeals court blocked the removal of alleged Venezuelan gang members under that law "because we find no invasion or predatory incursion."
Plus: Bombing "narco-terrorists" in the Caribbean, American manufacturing shrinks for the sixth consecutive month, Massie wants the Epstein files, and more...
The federal law relies on a risible reading of the Commerce Clause to restrict a constitutional right.
Donald Trump's claim that the appeals court ruled against him for partisan or ideological reasons is hard to take seriously.
The Administration's arguments have more doctrinal support than some might think
An antiquated law gives high school and college football first dibs on Fridays and Saturdays.
"The Federal Reserve is a uniquely structured, quasi-private entity," the Supreme Court wrote in a ruling this year.
Seven judges agreed that the president's assertion of unlimited authority to tax imports is illegal and unconstitutional.
Guatemalans don't wait for the government's permission. They build their own markets through voluntary exchange.
The mayor abandoned the plan after it aroused strong political resistance and threats of litigation.
Florida officials can’t agree on whether unpasteurized milk is a health threat or benefit, leaving consumers more confused than if they were left to decide for themselves.
In a 7-4 ruling, the en banc court upheld trial court ruling against all the challenged tariffs. The scope of the injunction against them remains to be determined.
Trump went "beyond the authority delegated to the President," the court ruled, but it vacated an injunction that could have provided immediate tariff relief to American businesses.
Congress holds the power of the purse in our system of government, and further eroding congressional responsibility for spending decisions will not end well.
Despite improvement, significant barriers remain to working many jobs.
The president's clear attempt to interfere in the Federal Reserve is not a one-off crisis.
The appeals court rejected most of the arguments in favor of that policy, saying "the government must show non-intoxicated marijuana users pose a risk of future danger."
Should they brag about raising taxes, like the White House is doing, or try to distance themselves from those same tax increases?
Or will the justices say that Trump fired her for illegal reasons?
When children are abused, we want government to step in. But Child Protective Services sometimes goes too far.
The president's plan to promote public safety by deploying troops in cities across the country is hard to reconcile with constitutional constraints on federal authority.
A federal grand jury reportedly refused to indict Sean Dunn for hurling a hoagie at a federal law enforcement officer.
The use of government force to achieve political advantage is dangerous and sets a bad precedent.
A recent federal appeals court decision underlines the importance of that safeguard.
His executive order directs the Justice Department to deny federal funds to jurisdictions that use cashless bail for suspects for many types of crimes. The plan is another assault on federalism and separation of powers.
Plus: An impressive book by a Supreme Court justice.
The decision overturns a staggering "disgorgement" order that was based on dubious math.
Most voters support submitting ballots by mail, and also voter ID.
Donald Trump is no stranger to wasteful spending. But these examples are especially egregious.
A federal district court judge granted environmentalist groups’ request for a preliminary injunction.
The D.C. Circuit declines to reach the merits of many of the serious underlying constitutional questions.
St. Catherine’s Monastery has been continuously inhabited for over 1,500 years. An Egyptian court ruling ended the monastery's longstanding separation from the government.
Property rights, public law, the police power, and the eminent domain power.