Supreme Court Refuses to Stay Biden EPA Power Plant Rule
Some were surprised by the Supreme Court's action, but they should not have been.
Some were surprised by the Supreme Court's action, but they should not have been.
British law allows local governments to enact absurdly censorious orders limiting "anti-social" behavior.
Legal scholar Michael Ramsey points out another way courts could reject Trump's plan to use the act as a tool for peacetime mass deportation.
Due to North Carolina's lack of an anti-SLAPP law, the defendants will have to defend themselves in court.
These policies may sound good on paper—but they would be disastrous in reality.
Plaintiff had argued that defendants' publicizing the religious court's statement "serves as a form of social pressure, calling on the community to shun or ostracize the individual until they comply with the court's demands."
Despite homelessness being on the rise, local governments keep cracking down on efforts to shelter those without permanent housing.
Plus: FEMA threat-related arrest, incentives for babymaking, "men" for Harris/Walz, and more...
How U.S. presidents habitually use—and abuse—pronouns to deceive.
Few problems can be resolved by grandstanding politicians threatening new penalties.
The plan is illegal. But courts might refuse to strike it down based on the "political questions" doctrine.
Can't Americans all just get along? Maybe we can't—and perhaps we shouldn't have to.
Americans are turning to home-cooked meals, but state regulators are making it harder for small food businesses to survive.
Mason Murphy says Officer Michael Schmitt violated his rights by punishing him for constitutionally protected speech.
It's fundamentally different from what Republicans have tried to do, but similar enough to be worrisome.
The court found scientific opinion about "shaken baby syndrome" has changed, and a man sentenced to 35 years in prison deserves a new trial.
A successful appointments clause challenge to Regional Fishery Management Councils. (Updated to fix block quotes)
Remembering the first time a partisan Senate minority blocked a judicial nomination that enjoyed majority support.
Donald Trump's plan for massive tariff increases is particularly dangerous because the White House could likely implement it without any new congressional authorization.
Max Boot's biography of Ronald Reagan is deeply researched and informative, but it sometimes stumbles when it tries to use the past to make sense of the present.
When they entered the White House, the budget deficit was a pandemic-influenced $2.3 trillion, and it was set to fall to $905 billion by 2024. It's now twice what it was supposed to be.
South Carolina bans all media interviews with incarcerated people, a policy the state's ACLU chapter says is the most restrictive in the country and infringes on its First Amendment rights.
"Right now, we need to get ourselves at least to a balanced budget, and that involves cutting a lot of the third rails of American politics," the Libertarian presidential nominee tells Reason.
Federal housing officials allege a New Hampshire landlord violated the Fair Housing Act for refusing to show a unit to two women with emotional support dogs.
The Supreme Court is considering whether a rule targeting "ghost guns" exceeds the agency's statutory authority.
Ryan Walters' strict stipulations make it clear he’s steering Oklahoma schools to purchase Donald Trump’s Bibles at a hefty cost.
Why is making spirits for personal use any of the government’s business in the first place?
A recent pair of panels looking at how nationwide injunctions impact federal regulatory programs.
That just isn't happening in the United States, no matter what Donald Trump keeps claiming.
Progressives are trying to fix the errors of the past, but they're ignoring the best solution: More robust property rights.
Many citizens of the land of the free are hooked on government checks.
No one knows how many federal crimes there are, the Supreme Court justice notes in Over Ruled.
Daniel Horwitz often represents people illegally silenced by the government. This time he says a court violated his First Amendment rights when it gagged him from publicly speaking about a troubled state prison.
"The judge soon learned that, in a recorded conversation between defense counsel and the defendant, the attorney had referred to the age, race, political affiliation, and gender of the court's judges, and suggested that the court 'should look a little bit more like the people that are in front of them.' The attorney also suggested that the defendant would not receive a fair trial from the court's judges, who are a different race and gender from the defendant. Finally, the attorney used a pejorative term, drawing on racial and gender stereotypes, to refer to the complainant."
A federal judge ruled that the law was overbroad and violated the First Amendment.
While congressmen hold performative hearings to win political points, they delegate policymaking to the administrative.
Tim Walz is wrong to insist that it would "keep our dignity about how we treat other people."
The education chapter is written by Williamson Evers, and the corporate law chapter by Robert T. Miller.
A federal judge rejected the officers' claims of qualified immunity.
Conservatives blame Proposition 47 (2014) for higher rates of shoplifting in the state, but the real story is more complicated.
The IRS fines hostages for taxes they couldn't pay while they were detained. A bill in Congress is trying to fix this.
(You don't really have to shut up, but here's my money.)
Yes, I'll donate to Reason right now! I'll keep my money today, thanksReason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksHelp Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksReason is the antidote to the same old stale take on ideas that actually matter to me.
I’ll support Free Minds and Free Markets! Not interestedReason pushes me to think critically with facts and analysis that shape my perspective and amplify the ideas I care about.
I want to make a donation so that my voice can be heard! Not todayEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedIt’s hard to trust the media these days, especially when everyone is pushing a partisan agenda. Reason stands for my right to make my own choices.
Yes, I want to make a difference for Free Minds and Free Markets! No, I’ll follow the partisan herdReason’s fearless, principled journalism keeps me sane in a crazy world.
Making a donation to Reason right now will keep me from losing my mind! No, I like being madSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksSupport the voices that advocate for your freedom. Donate to Reason today!
Yes, I want to make a difference for Free Minds and Free Markets! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today