The court concludes states are likely to succeed in their procedural challenges to the Education Department's decision to extend Bostock to Title IX.
The plaintiffs are challenging the state's widespread surveillance, which it collects through over 600 cameras.
The justices still have over one-third of the term's cases remaining.
Six justices agreed that federal regulators had misconstrued the statutory definition of a machine gun.
The justice's benign comments set off a lengthy news cycle and have been treated as a scandal by some in the media. Why?
In his AHM v. FDA concurrence, Justice Thomas suggests the Court needs to rethink associational standing and questions whether it comports with Article III.
As Justice Sonia Sotomayor noted during oral arguments, the right to sell a shirt is different from the right to be the only one who can sell that shirt.
...as protests outside Congress escalate into violence.
Not a single justice was impressed by the unimpressive standing theories offered in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA.
Plus: The Federal Reserve considers an interest rate cut, its chairman considers persistently high inflation, housing pops up on the National Mall, and more...
The new FAFSA form is like HealthCare.gov but for college students.
The decision allows the lawsuit to proceed, albeit with fewer plaintiffs.
Government school advocates say competition "takes money away" from government schools. That is a lie.
A new study suggests political considerations may influence the enforcement of federal environmental law.
Plus: Sen. John Fetterman introduces a new zoning reform bill, U.C. Berkeley finally beats the NIMBYs in court, and Austin's unwise "equity overlay."
The court ruled that it is unconstitutional for officials to remove library books with the "intent to deprive patrons of access to ideas with which they disagree."
The plaintiffs hope to "help Republicans and conservatives see why this ban is inconsistent with the free speech values they say they care about."
Officials suspend efforts to force X to suppress the world’s access to video of a crime.
Ending U.S. aid would give Washington less leverage in the Middle East. That's why it's worth doing.
A new law will make it much harder to film law enforcement officers in their public duties. Does that violate the First Amendment?
California's stringent AI regulations have the power to stifle innovation nationwide, impacting all of us.
The transit authority was sued after rejecting an ad that directed viewers to go to a website "to find out about the faith of our founders."
Fifth in a series of guest-blogging posts.
They're coming for new bags after old bag-ban failed.
Reasonable options include gradually raising the minimum retirement age, adjusting benefits to reflect longer life expectancies, and implementing fair means-testing to ensure benefits flow where they're actually needed.
Fourth in a series of guest-blogging posts.
Republican lawmakers are undoing bipartisan measures against unjust prison sentences and punitive policies.
Yareni Rios was severely injured after a train struck a police car she had been placed in after being arrested in 2022.
Law enforcement could arrest those they suspect of crossing into the state illegally—and they’d be “immune from liability for damages.”
Third in a seris of guest-blogging posts.
At yesterday's congressional hearing, the former NIAID director played word games and shifted blame in an effort to dismiss credible claims that his agency funded work that caused the pandemic.
Green groups dropped their suits after the various challenges to the SEC's climate disclosure rule were consolidated in a fairly conservative circuit.
The Safer Supervision Act would create an off-ramp for those with good behavior to petition to have their supervised release sentences terminated early.
Second in a series of guest-blogging posts.
Plus: Cryogenic freezing, masking for robberies, Trump surrenders his guns, and more...
Plus: A single-issue voter asks the editors for some voting advice in the 2024 presidential election.
Bans have resulted in what some have called the "whitewashing" of American juries.
An amendment in the state's election law would delay implementation of a proposed November ballot initiative. Voting organizations urge a governor's veto.
First in a series of guest-blogging posts.
The book argues that the structural elements of the Constitution should be interpreted in a way that empowers the federal government to address collective action problems facing the states.
Welcome to a system in which laws and regulations are weaponized by the powerful against opponents.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10
