Supreme Court to Tackle Who Can Sue Agencies Where and for What
With today's cert grants, the Court now has four cases that address the issue of where suits can be filed against federal agencies and who can file them.
With today's cert grants, the Court now has four cases that address the issue of where suits can be filed against federal agencies and who can file them.
As with Biden, you can count on Harris to expand government programs.
Another interesting aside in the Royal Canin oral argument.
An amusing and potentially revealing exchange in a recent oral argument.
Drew Johnson wants to help define the post-Trump GOP.
The state has been demanding that TV stations remove political ads in support of a reproductive freedom amendment on the ballot this year.
As technology develops, we anticipate the use of LLM AI tools to augment corpus linguistic analysis of ordinary meaning—without outsourcing the ultimate task of legal interpretation.
Healthcare promises always come with high costs.
It appears that a majority of judges on the D.C. Circuit believe it should be easier to seek judicial review of Federal Elections Commission non-enforcement decisions.
As it stands, the program effectively redistributes money from younger and poorer people to richer people.
Some were surprised by the Supreme Court's action, but they should not have been.
British law allows local governments to enact absurdly censorious orders limiting "anti-social" behavior.
The selling points of LLM AIs are insufficient; corpus tools hold the advantage.
Legal scholar Michael Ramsey points out another way courts could reject Trump's plan to use the act as a tool for peacetime mass deportation.
Due to North Carolina's lack of an anti-SLAPP law, the defendants will have to defend themselves in court.
"[C]ounsel has an affirmative duty to disclose the use of artificial intelligence and the evidence sought to be admitted should properly be subject to a Frye hearing prior to its admission ...."
LLM AIs are too susceptible to manipulation—and too prone to inconsistency—to be viewed as reliable means of producing empirical evidence of ordinary meaning.
These policies may sound good on paper—but they would be disastrous in reality.
Plaintiff had argued that defendants' publicizing the religious court's statement "serves as a form of social pressure, calling on the community to shun or ostracize the individual until they comply with the court's demands."
Despite homelessness being on the rise, local governments keep cracking down on efforts to shelter those without permanent housing.
Plus: FEMA threat-related arrest, incentives for babymaking, "men" for Harris/Walz, and more...
Our draft article shows that corpus linguistics delivers where LLM AI tools fall short—in producing nuanced linguistic data instead of bare, artificial conclusions.
How U.S. presidents habitually use—and abuse—pronouns to deceive.
As we show in a draft article, corpus linguistic tools have been shown to do what LLM AIs cannot—produce transparent, replicable evidence of how a word or phrase is ordinarily used by the public.
Few problems can be resolved by grandstanding politicians threatening new penalties.
The plan is illegal. But courts might refuse to strike it down based on the "political questions" doctrine.
Can't Americans all just get along? Maybe we can't—and perhaps we shouldn't have to.
Americans are turning to home-cooked meals, but state regulators are making it harder for small food businesses to survive.
Mason Murphy says Officer Michael Schmitt violated his rights by punishing him for constitutionally protected speech.
It's fundamentally different from what Republicans have tried to do, but similar enough to be worrisome.
The court found scientific opinion about "shaken baby syndrome" has changed, and a man sentenced to 35 years in prison deserves a new trial.
A successful appointments clause challenge to Regional Fishery Management Councils. (Updated to fix block quotes)
Remembering the first time a partisan Senate minority blocked a judicial nomination that enjoyed majority support.
Donald Trump's plan for massive tariff increases is particularly dangerous because the White House could likely implement it without any new congressional authorization.
Max Boot's biography of Ronald Reagan is deeply researched and informative, but it sometimes stumbles when it tries to use the past to make sense of the present.
When they entered the White House, the budget deficit was a pandemic-influenced $2.3 trillion, and it was set to fall to $905 billion by 2024. It's now twice what it was supposed to be.
South Carolina bans all media interviews with incarcerated people, a policy the state's ACLU chapter says is the most restrictive in the country and infringes on its First Amendment rights.
"Right now, we need to get ourselves at least to a balanced budget, and that involves cutting a lot of the third rails of American politics," the Libertarian presidential nominee tells Reason.
Federal housing officials allege a New Hampshire landlord violated the Fair Housing Act for refusing to show a unit to two women with emotional support dogs.
The Supreme Court is considering whether a rule targeting "ghost guns" exceeds the agency's statutory authority.
Ryan Walters' strict stipulations make it clear he’s steering Oklahoma schools to purchase Donald Trump’s Bibles at a hefty cost.
Why is making spirits for personal use any of the government’s business in the first place?
A recent pair of panels looking at how nationwide injunctions impact federal regulatory programs.
That just isn't happening in the United States, no matter what Donald Trump keeps claiming.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10
Notifications