Neil Gorsuch and Stephen Breyer Butt Heads Over Judicial Deference to Federal Agencies
Understanding what's at stake in the important case of Kisor v. Wilkie.
Understanding what's at stake in the important case of Kisor v. Wilkie.
Attorney Mike Chase, behind the popular @CrimeADay Twitter feed, talks about his new book, How to Become a Federal Criminal.
The fed-up Michigan congressman just left the House Freedom Caucus he helped found.
Plus: psychedelics research bill moves forward, big companies push back against abortion bans, and more...
A letter signed by a wide range of scholars with different political and jurisprudential views urges Congress to sue to end illegal US involvement in the Yemen conflict.
The civil liberties giant defends a law professor who took on Harvey Weinstein as a client.
Mike Chase, the man behind the popular @CrimeADay Twitter feed, on his new book, How to Become a Federal Criminal
In his recent memoir, he admits he seriously misinterpreted precedent in one of his most controversial decisions, but maintains he still got the result right.
Jamelle Bouie's counterintuitive recommendation would effectively eliminate constitutional limits on elected officials, including Trump and every demagogue who follows him.
Steve Sachs and I defend originalism against charges of "law office history."
From Prof. Jonathan Nash (Emory), an expert on Congressional standing.
The Senate majority leader says he will not allow a vote on it, despite widespread support for the measure.
You might consider buying a hat to cover your face—and hoping you’ll be allowed to wear it.
So far, the answer is "maybe."
Plus: intra-conservative culture war, Tulsi Gabbard on Snowden, and more…
The decision does not reach the merits of President Trump's attempt to divert military funds to build his border wall.
Paul's proposal to cut 2 percent from the federal budget for the next five years was predictably opposed by both Democrats and most Republicans
Both still see surveillance abuse that needs fixing. They’re pursuing different paths to get there.
Sometimes Dershowitz gives really bad advice
An awful lot, but who's counting?
An interesting separation of powers question coming in the Female Genital Mutilation statute / Commerce Clause / Religious Freedom Restoration Act / Dawoodi Bohra litigation.
If Kavanaugh is a committed originalist, you would never know it based on his complacent behavior in Timbs v. Indiana.
You can’t overdose on fentanyl simply by touching it.
Free market reformers and authoritarian nationalists battle it out to reshape Brazil.
Voters will decide next year whether to impose it.
SCOTUS sidesteps the hard questions in Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky.
A recent dissenting opinion by Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch highlights some of the dangers of the enormous scope of modern criminal law.
The symposium includes contributions by 16 legal commentators, including VC bloggers Keith Whittington and myself.
Demanding that members of Congress be in town to vote on spending huge sums of money seems reasonable.
If you had never heard of Amash before, it was a perfect introduction to his views on just about every significant issue. If you are familiar with him, it was a standout performance.
In another long Twitter thread, the libertarian-ish Michigan Republican says AG Barr "helped further the president’s false narrative about the investigation."
More often than you might think
The first court decision on Trump's plan to reallocate federal funds to "build the wall" goes against the administration.
The Utah Supreme Court upheld a six-month suspension without pay, based in part (though not entirely) on these remarks; the judge has a history of past discipline on other grounds as well.
Episode 4 of Free Speech Rules, starring UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh
Depends on who you ask.
A new history of how the U,.S. Supreme Court has defined and enforced the limits of congressional power
Whether or not you agree with Amash, his demeanor this week stands in stark contrast to how most of Trump's defenders—and the president himself—have reacted to Amash's statements.
Plus: Snowflakes in House Freedom Caucus continue to melt down over Amash comments, Michael Avenatti charged for stealing from Stormy Daniels, and more...
There aren't more like him in Congress. Which is why he might take the third-party plunge.
The bill allows dual prosecutions of people in the president's orbit who receive pardons or commutations.
While well-intentioned, the alert system is often ineffective.
The grounds for removing a president extend beyond statutory violations that could be proven in a criminal trial.
A federal judge rejects the President's attempt to block a Congressional subpoena of his financial records.
The latest bad idea from Bernie Sanders is depressingly popular, sayeth the podcast crew.
Bill de Blasio's coming humiliation is just the latest evidence of the outer-borough president's revenge on Manhattan.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks