District Court Judge Revives Kids Climate Case
Years after the Ninth Circuit ordered the case dismissed, it is brought back to life with a surprising trial court order.
Years after the Ninth Circuit ordered the case dismissed, it is brought back to life with a surprising trial court order.
Justice Kavanaugh continues to support granting certiorari in cases his colleagues do not wish to hear.
The Supreme Court issues five merits opinions, but there are still forty more waiting.
Plus: A look back at Rochelle Walensky's tenure as head of the CDC
This Supreme Court term is setting a record for not releasing opinions in argued cases.
Justice Kavanaugh was alone in noting his desire to accept certiorari in two cases the justices rejected.
Abortion and gerrymandering are likely to be on the court's docket in the near future, and Janet Protasiewicz ran unabashedly to the left on both issues. Is this the best way to decide contentious topics?
Opponents of the proposed reforms are right that unlimited majority rule is a recipe for tyranny.
Observing Israel (and the United States) through the lens of political science
The surprising recent rise in partisan, racial, and gender differences in circuit judges following earlier opinions.
Is testimony over Zoom consistent with a criminal defendant's Constitutional rights?
A nominee's work defending a state parental-notification law in 2005 may be a stumbling block to his confirmation.
The Court's newest justice questions whether her colleagues are too quick to vacate lower court decisions.
The bill is overbroad and could have unintended consequences.
Why I oppose both right-wing efforts to neuter judicial review in Israel and left-wing attempts to do the same in the US.
Thoughts on recent oral argument exchanges on whether the Administrative Procedure Act contemplates (let alone requires) universal vacatur.
The Bank Secrecy Act divides the justices in an unusual way, and Justice Barrett authors her fourth opinion in an argued case.
To the junior-most justice goes a case arising out of the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction concerning the Abandoned Money Orders and Traveler's Checks Act.
The Supreme Court considers the scope of presidential power in Biden v. Nebraska and Department of Education v. Brown.
Justice Barrett has produced two majority opinions before most of her colleagues have produced one.
A proposal to limit state AG (and other) forum-shopping for national injunctions.
We may have finally discovered a limit to judicial immunity.
By destroying judicial review, they would empower the narrow right-wing majority to violate the rights of minorities.
The Supreme Court has been slow to issue opinions this term, but the first opinion has finally been released.
It may sound bizarre, but yes, you can be punished at sentencing for an offense you were acquitted of by a jury.
The justices heard oral arguments in Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo.
It is becoming a pattern for Supreme Court justices to make significant amounts of money by publishing books.
Justice Thomas' footprints are all over the Court's recently concluded term.
Jonathan Mitchell failed in his effort to become a legal academic, so he put his theories into practice instead.
A brief report on Justice Sonia Sotomayor's remarks to the Assocation of American Law Schools conference.
The Appeals Panel Rejects a Trangender Student's Bid to Use Bathroom Corresponding to the Student's Gender Identity Instead of Biological Sex.
The Supreme Court's oral arguments have become significantly longer, but the Court has yet to issue an opinion on the merits so far this term.
The governor and attorney general say they’ll appeal to the state Supreme Court.
A progressive makes the case the two justices should step down within the next two years so that President Biden may appoint their successors with a Democratic Senate.
A split U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit denied an en banc petition challenging the Federal Election Commission's failure to pursue claims against New Models.
Slate's legal correspondent questioned the Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit about the Federalist Society.
Originalist scholar Larry Solum suggests KBJ could be the Left's Antonin Scalia.
In a brief and forceful opinion, a unanimous court explains why the trial court never had jurisdiction to consider Trump's filings in the first place.
Ohio Governor Mike DeWine's appointment to the Supreme Court will dertermine the orientation of the Ohio Supreme Court.
Justices Thomas and Gorsuch have a much greater appetite for reconsidering prior precedent than the other justices do.
A divided panel concludes that government officials forced to testify at Flint Water Crisis civil trial did not waive their constitutional right against self-incrimination just because they had answered questions in depositions.
Supreme Court protesters may get their moment of fame, but they may make it less likely the justices will allow live video broadcast of oral arguments.
The federal appellate judge suggests judges should focus less on social media attention, and more on ensuring their opinions are clear, succinct and correct.
The Honorable Ben Beaton would prefer not to be called "Your Honor."
An amicus brief by Professor Derek Muller suggests the justices need not confront the "Independent State Legislature" doctrine head on.
Pro-tip: If you are sued, and you expect your insurer to pick up the bill, it is a good idea to give them timely notice.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks