An immigration judge found the official document initiating Kseniia Petrova’s deportation to be legally deficient. She remains in detention, unable to further her cancer research.
To remain independent, institutions of higher education should end their reliance on taxpayer money.
The president has launched a multifaceted crusade against speech that offends him.
The administration's demands extend far beyond its avowed concern about antisemitism and enforcement of "civil rights laws."
Plus: Democrats visit El Salvador, Taiwan invasion possibilities, Hayek on rule of law, and more...
Apparently freezing $2 billion in federal funding wasn't enough.
Harvard's law faculty previously criticized the Obama administration's assault on norms of free speech and due process.
As Israel-Hamas demonstrations continue in the new school year, the misunderstanding of free speech is fueling disruption and hypocrisy on campuses.
A Harvard Dean suggests universities can and should limit controversial speech.
Harvard is taking steps away from politicization. Will other schools follow?
Following months of campus protests over the war between Israel and Hamas, the university has announced that it will no longer weigh in on current events.
The Institute for Justice has launched a project to reform land use regulation.
Plus: Joe Biden pushes through new background checks for gun purchases, O.J. Simpson dies, NA beer takes D.C., and more...
Martin Kulldorff talks about his dismissal from Harvard Medical School, persisting college vaccine mandates, and surviving COVID-era censorship on the latest episode of Just Asking Questions.
Activists oppose research on how to safely deploy an emergency cooling system for the planet.
The psychologist and bestselling author argues that Harvard's free speech policy was so "selectively prosecuted that it became a national joke."
Harvard should pick someone with academic integrity as its next president.
Plus: Aid for Ukraine, remote learning for 5-year-olds, intermittent fasting for Palestine, and more...
How identity politics and institutional cowardice have undermined the free speech on which our society relies.
Aaron Sibarium discusses the downfall of former Harvard President Claudine Gay on the latest episode of Just Asking Questions.
Plus: Which is worse, trashing Nancy Pelosi's office or having sex in a Senate hearing room?
Plus: Nuking the Hamptons, upcharging the autists, tearing down the statues, and more...
Plus: Gay fallout, Lithuanian badasses, Epstein buddies, Haley chutzpah, and more...
The media response to Claudine Gay's ouster has been ludicrous.
Plus: Trump sues over ballot access, the CCP tells people to have sex, and more...
The next president should put more effort into fixing the college's abysmal free speech ranking.
Big government has been ruinous for millions of people. Charities aren't perfect, but they are much more efficient and effective.
Academic malfeasance by Harvard's president deserves media coverage and condemnation, not excuses.
Plus: A listener asks if there is any place libertarians can go to start their own country or city state.
Plus: Digital AR-15s, actual AR-15s, politicians livestreaming sex acts, and more...
Plus: Deepfakes in porn, Randi Weingarten's amnesia, San Francisco's Chinese-name crackdown, and more...
If activists want to help young people, they should start before college.
Contra Joe Biden, they argue that these recent rulings show respect for individual rights and concern for racial and sexual minorities.
A new complaint argues that legacy admissions violate the Civil Rights Act.
Plus: A listener question on the potential efficacy of congressional term limits.
A preliminary assessment of today's decisions. The majority rightly struck a blow against the use of racial preferences for purposes of advancing "diversity" in education. But there are some flaws in its reasoning.
There is no reason for public universities to grant preferential treatment to the scions of their alumni.
In a 6–3 decision, the Court ruled that race-based affirmative action in college admissions violates the 14th Amendment.
Affirmative action becomes harder to defend when it entails discrimination against a variety of racial and ethnic minority groups.
The conservative majority on the Court is highly likely to rule against the two schools' use of racial preferences in admissions. But there are several different ways it could do so, which have different implications for future cases.
Pro-tip: If you are sued, and you expect your insurer to pick up the bill, it is a good idea to give them timely notice.
Do First Amendment claims about racial preferences hold water?
The event was postponed in order to mollify students who said trying to treat autism was "hateful, eugenicist."
While some legal ethics experts suggest recusal would not be necessary, the SCOTUS nominee suggested she thinks otherwise.
I argue the justices should crack down on the dubious "diversity" rationale for racial preferences, and curb discrimination against Asian-American applicants.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10
