Should Justice Sotomayor Retire? Some People Think So.
Some liberals and progressives think Justice Sotomayor should retire this year to ensure a Democratic President names her replacement.
Some liberals and progressives think Justice Sotomayor should retire this year to ensure a Democratic President names her replacement.
There are reasons to suspect the justices were wrangling over language up until the last minute.
The Supreme Court's docket may be awfully small, but it's not Justice Kavanaugh's fault.
Things you may have missed between the Trump disqualification case, Biden special counsel report, and NBA trade deadline.
Some candid remarks at the University of California at Berkeley
Quite a few judges have opted to take senior status, but some who are eligible have not.
The post is by prominent Israeli legal scholar Ronit Levine-Schnur (University of Tel Aviv).
A rare federal court decision denying Younger abstention.
The Court is taking more cases from the Fifth Circuit, and its decisions do not appear to be faring well.
Not all of the justices are happy about the Court's stingy approach to certiorari.
An interesting empirical study looks at whether better briefs lead to better outcomes.
The new law is probably the least objectionable part of the right-wing government's attack on judicial review in Israel.
October Term 2022 saw a significant drop in the number of paid petitions for certiorari. Is it a trend?
Contrary to popular perception, the current Supreme Court overturns precedent and declares laws to be unconstitutional less often than its predecessors did.
Some end-of-term comments and an assessment of my end-of-term predictions.
The President strongly criticized the Supreme Court's recent decisions, but refuses to endorse radical reform.
The question presented is whether the 16th Amendment authorizes Congress to tax unrealized sums without apportionment among the states.
Applying settled precedent, the court bars a Bivens action, but Judge Walker suggests a possilble alternative.
The Honorable David B. Sentelle has heard his last case.
Some worth-what-you-paid-for-them predictions for the final(?) week of SCOTUS opinions.
Maria Elena Reimers has been caught in legal limbo for years.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson may speak the most at oral argument, but Justice Thomas is writing more pages.
Years after the Ninth Circuit ordered the case dismissed, it is brought back to life with a surprising trial court order.
Justice Kavanaugh continues to support granting certiorari in cases his colleagues do not wish to hear.
The Supreme Court issues five merits opinions, but there are still forty more waiting.
Plus: A look back at Rochelle Walensky's tenure as head of the CDC
This Supreme Court term is setting a record for not releasing opinions in argued cases.
Justice Kavanaugh was alone in noting his desire to accept certiorari in two cases the justices rejected.
Abortion and gerrymandering are likely to be on the court's docket in the near future, and Janet Protasiewicz ran unabashedly to the left on both issues. Is this the best way to decide contentious topics?
Opponents of the proposed reforms are right that unlimited majority rule is a recipe for tyranny.
Observing Israel (and the United States) through the lens of political science
The surprising recent rise in partisan, racial, and gender differences in circuit judges following earlier opinions.
Is testimony over Zoom consistent with a criminal defendant's Constitutional rights?
A nominee's work defending a state parental-notification law in 2005 may be a stumbling block to his confirmation.
The Court's newest justice questions whether her colleagues are too quick to vacate lower court decisions.
The bill is overbroad and could have unintended consequences.
Why I oppose both right-wing efforts to neuter judicial review in Israel and left-wing attempts to do the same in the US.
Thoughts on recent oral argument exchanges on whether the Administrative Procedure Act contemplates (let alone requires) universal vacatur.
The Bank Secrecy Act divides the justices in an unusual way, and Justice Barrett authors her fourth opinion in an argued case.
To the junior-most justice goes a case arising out of the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction concerning the Abandoned Money Orders and Traveler's Checks Act.
The Supreme Court considers the scope of presidential power in Biden v. Nebraska and Department of Education v. Brown.
Justice Barrett has produced two majority opinions before most of her colleagues have produced one.
A proposal to limit state AG (and other) forum-shopping for national injunctions.
We may have finally discovered a limit to judicial immunity.
By destroying judicial review, they would empower the narrow right-wing majority to violate the rights of minorities.
The Supreme Court has been slow to issue opinions this term, but the first opinion has finally been released.
It may sound bizarre, but yes, you can be punished at sentencing for an offense you were acquitted of by a jury.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10