Against the "Banana Republic" Critique of Indicting Trump
The real banana republic danger is if high officials can commit serious crimes with impunity.
The real banana republic danger is if high officials can commit serious crimes with impunity.
Legislators from both parties worry about unilateral power, but they use it when it’s convenient.
Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch highlights a vital lesson from the COVID-19 pandemic.
No amount of experience can solve the "knowledge problem."
The former president reminds us that claiming unbridled executive power is a bipartisan tendency.
The stay is only temporary, and could be quickly lifted. But it's still a negative sign for the plaintiffs in the case.
The papers are for an upcoming conference on the topic of whether federal agency adjudication of private rights should be curbed or ended. There is a $2500 honorarium for authors of selected papers.
The former president says he did not solicit election fraud; he merely tried to correct a "rigged" election. And he says he did not illegally retain government records, because they were his property.
Under Walensky, the CDC's voluntary guidance was anything but.
Overruling Chevron won't gut the administrative state or even severely constrain it. But it could help strengthen the rule of law.
Regulations costing less than $200 million will no longer be considered "economically significant."
A Texas jury unanimously rejected Perry’s assertion that Garrett Foster pointed a rifle at him.
A government big enough to "solve" your minor irritants will do plenty of other stuff you don't like.
What at first appears to be deregulation is actually economic activism in disguise.
Legal scholar Ilan Wurman argues the controversial doctrine is justifiable on textualist and linguistic grounds.
The president wants to redefine federally licensed gun dealers in service of an ineffective anti-crime strategy.
The president and his predecessor both tried to impose gun control by executive fiat.
Critics claim the doctrine is obviously at odds with textualism. But that isn't the case.
The Supreme Court considers the scope of presidential power in Biden v. Nebraska and Department of Education v. Brown.
Professor Michael McConnell writes to suggest that even if Vice President Pence was performing legislative functions on January 6, the Constitution's text does not extend the privilege to him.
Plus: Texas prosecutors can't criminally charge people who help others access out-of-state abortions, food trucks fight rules banning them in 96 percent of North Carolina city, and more...
The January 6 invistigations have renewed interest in this somewhat obscure constitutional provision and the scope of its protections.
Like his predecessors, the current president ignores the law when it suits him.
Just consider the policies that the Founding Fathers embraced.
While the office was created with "modest authority and limited responsibilities," the modern president has increasingly unchecked power and authority.
The move makes it more likely that Title 42 expulsions of migrants will end in the near future.
Most independent contractors don’t want the PRO Act anyway.
The president reaped political benefits with his pre-election proclamation but has yet to follow through.
January's consumer price data indicates another drop in annual inflation, but the past three months might tell a different story.
Plus: a listener question on prohibition and a lightning round on the editors' favorite Super Bowl moments
By raising the effective tax rate on capital gains, the proposal would reduce U.S. saving, discourage entrepreneurship, and decrease economic output.
And increase total health care costs to boot.
Instead of empowering the government to intervene, we should look more holistically at the experience of young people online.
It's a fundamental contradiction that's affected the Biden administration's economic policy for the past two years.
Legal scholar Michael Dorf claims Supreme Court should rule on this basis. But the doctrine doesn't apply to this case, and is dubious anyway.
During the State of the Union, Biden claimed that "children who go to preschool are nearly 50 percent more likely to finish high school and go on to earn a two- or four-year degree," but evidence in favor of universal pre-k programs is lacking.
Biden's speech offered plenty of opportunity to present a counter-narrative to continued taxes and spending. Instead Sanders went a different direction.
As usual, Biden's gun policy proposals bump up against reality.
His State of the Union address sketched a foreign policy that is reckless on some points, relatively restrained on others, and utterly uninterested in any real resolution to America’s lingering military entanglements.
In his State of the Union address Tuesday, President Joe Biden said that he wants to hold police "accountable." But he neglected to mention the elephant in the room.
Plus: Bill would make all social media platforms check IDs, appeals court rejects rent control challenge, and more...
The president's State of the Union address re-upped a tired, old promise to spend more tax dollars on less infrastructure.
His administration has contributed to the problems Biden says he wants to solve.
Biden vowed to block any attempts to cut Social Security benefits, and Republicans made it clear that they have little appetite to try it.
What we can learn from the State of the Union addresses by Jimmy Carter in 1979, Richard Nixon in 1971, and JFK in 1963
Plus: Court denies motion to suppress January 6 geofence warrant, Texas may ban some immigrants from buying property, and more...