Conservatives Embrace Anti-Discrimination Principles
Anti-discrimination law was pioneered by the political left. But, in recent years, conservatives have increasingly tried to use it for their own purposes.
Anti-discrimination law was pioneered by the political left. But, in recent years, conservatives have increasingly tried to use it for their own purposes.
The estimate implies an overall infection fatality rate of about 0.5 percent, although that number should be viewed with caution.
The Stanford professor and Great Barrington Declaration coauthor stands up to COVID-19 autocrats and disastrous lockdowns by following the science.
Though travel isn't completely back to normal, this change is an overdue acknowledgment that we can't always view COVID-19 transmission as catastrophic.
Revived mandates remind everyone that governments have done far more harm than good in the pandemic.
If the rules don't apply to everyone, they ought not apply to anyone.
Meanwhile the FDA dawdles over second boosters as new COVID-19 wave approaches
The city's private employer vaccine mandate is not just an overreaching policy; it's now a completely nonsensical and ineffective one.
Disagreement over pandemic policy accelerates the slide toward authoritarianism in another country.
"If I do my job right, you should barely know I'm here."
Mocking COVID public health theater is finally going mainstream.
There’s no freedom if the state can separate us from our money.
For the first time in two years, Coachella will return. Festival attendees will be able to enjoy themselves without having to abide by nonsensical mandates.
In an age of elite scorn, government mandates, a rotten economy—and powerful, decentralized communication tools—common people are pushing back.
Apparently the rule of law doesn’t matter if Justin Trudeau doesn’t like your peaceful protest.
Our gentle neighbor to the North rushes toward grim authoritarianism.
The answer, as Tyler Cowen and Matthew Yglesias, argue, is probably not. But political ignorance is still a serious problem.
Did Justin Trudeau accidentally prove crypto bros' point?
Seven out of 10 Americans say "it's time we accept COVID is here to stay and we just need to get on with our lives." Politicians are taking notice.
Plus, the editors' takes on the Super Bowl.
"The District’s indoor mask requirements will be dialed back on March 1, 2022," said Bowser.
What Joe Rogan and Canadian truckers tell us about free speech.
Los Angeles Libertarians to start gathering signatures to overturn the four-month-old ordinance.
Plus: National debt tops $30 trilion, Whoopi Goldberg suspended over Holocaust comments, and more...
"My servers are not lesser people," said owner Eric Flannery. "They don't need to be masked. They don't carry disease."
"Obviously we could have used the money, but at what cost?,” says Sheila Hemphill, an activist and lobbyist from Brady, Texas
Supporters of that policy assume it works, then desperately search for evidence to validate that conviction.
The students' negative COVID tests weren't good enough for school administrators.
The Big Board on H Street continues to insist that "all are welcome."
That process takes a long time, and the result would face the same legal objection cited by the Supreme Court.
SCOTUS rejected attempt to bypass Congress with an emergency regulation.
Maybe it's because pandemic policies are forcing them to continue being anxious.
Politicians evade responsibility when they make civilians enforce mask and vaccine mandates.
School choice is the best alternative for parents who are reasonably frustrated with this insanity.
Insofar as the Court was concerned about pretext, it may be more difficult for the EPA to reduce greenhouse gases using regulatory authority to control emissions.
Nationwide, newly reported infections have been falling since January 14.
You don't have to be anti-vaccine to oppose these ever-expanding requirements.
How to make a terrible case for a good cause
Unvaccinated Americans over age 50 are 44 times more likely to be hospitalized than triple-vaccinated folks.
Ron DeSantis killed people because Florida didn't impose tougher rules, we're told. But it's not true.
The question for the Supreme Court was not whether the policy was wise but whether it was legal.
The crux of the argument is the distinction "between occupational risk and risk more generally."
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10