Choosing Smart Embryos Isn't Immoral
It would be deeply immoral to require parents to select for particular traits, but it is also wrong to deny them the chance to make life easier for their children.
It would be deeply immoral to require parents to select for particular traits, but it is also wrong to deny them the chance to make life easier for their children.
A new international commission will consider the pros and cons of human genome editing.
Is the solution a "fertility dividend" that makes a portion of a person's Social Security benefit dependent on each of their offspring's earnings?
Flinging around such terms is not helpful and does not advance the debate.
If it's safe, then it's ethical. No need for a global moratorium.
Falling fertility means that folks now have increasing power to choose the number of children that they wish to have.
There is no compelling ethical reason to limit this exercise of reproductive liberty.
If you read Reason you already know these three pieces of good news about global trends.
Maybe, but it's more likely that Americans chose to have fewer kids.
Exercising reproductive freedom is a good thing.
A new article in BioScience vindicates The End of Doom.
"Governments should follow the principle of regulatory parsimony," two bioethicists argue.
Ronald Bailey's 11-minute talk at Voice & Exit on the awesome 21st century.
New report claims U.S. overpopulation will blight their futures.
There's an easy way to make more Americans: immigration.
Increased wealth and technological progress give people greater liberty to decide when, how, with whom, and if they want to reproduce.
Anti-designer baby bioethicists call for "an immediate global ban."
Breakthrough that could cure genetic diseases before embryos are implanted in their mothers' wombs.
Neo-Malthusianism in the Sunday New York Times
Bioethicists in Britain say yes. But there are no such limits in the U.S. yet.
Will most babies be created using in vitro gametogenesis in 40 years?
Creation of artificial mouse embryos provokes bioethical handwringing about designer babies
Ronald Bailey reviews Johan Norberg's new book celebrating Progress
There's never been a better time to be alive
Due to FDA ban parents must resort to treatments abroad in order to have a healthy baby
Swedish researcher denounced by bioconservatives for using CRISPR genome-editing on human embryos
Also most babies will be created using skin cells and the bioethics of radical life extension
U.S. total fertility rate close to lowest ever too
National Institutes of Health bioethicists agree with me and lift research moratorium
Three-parent babies are now possible. Congress should get out of the way.
Why should not men be eligible for uterine transplants?
Comparing his scores on seven science policy topics to Cruz, Rubio, and Bush
Global warming could cool sexual passions and reduce birth rates.
Researchers will use CRISPR gene-editing technique to explore how human embryos develop.
"If scientists can dream of a genetic manipulation, CRISPR can now make it happen"
Richer is more climate-friendly, especially for developing countries.
Global warming will cool sexual passion, says new study
Reproductive central planning works as badly as economic central planning
New York Times columnist reveals today the "secret" that my new book documents.
Library Journal reviews my new book, published today.
So argues Eugene Volokh, albeit with a bit more subtlety.
Danish researcher claims that plastics and cosmetics are emasculating.
Bioethicists and scientists who say otherwise are wrong.
A contract is a contract, but a more generous spirit might relent
Permissionless innovation works best for both scientific and moral progress.
Naturally the usual bioluddites are eager to stop progress.