House Armed Services Committee Working on $600B+ Defense Bill
Want to address issues from sexual assault to the war in Afghanistan
Want to address issues from sexual assault to the war in Afghanistan
First decline since 1988 fuelled by cuts in the West
The scariest tiny little cutbacks in the entire world
Thanks to budgeting battle, expect it to be extremely confusing
Doesn't want U.S. retreating from interventionism
Continuing Resolution gives them $10 billion in additional funds
Would make them harder for enemy to target
The U.S. record at nation-building isn't much better at home than abroad.
It's not the end of the world
It's never wise to rely on Uncle Sugar
Both sides are guilty of using fear in the sequestration debate.
And, of course, the Buffett Rule
Would be able to analyze face, eyes, voice and thumbpring
Eases rules in order to allow production as part of troubled program
Says eliminating tax subsidies for oil companies would help
Maybe have to absorb $700 million as they go over budget on contract
In lawsuit, says he was trying to stop company from billing U.S. for work it didn't do
Despite sequestration being ditched and no interest for cuts by the Washington establishment
Spending put on hold pending fiscal cliff outcomes
Nearly everyone knows someone who gets paid by the Pentagon. That's why it's so hard to cut.
Want the traditional sacred cow considered in fiscal cliff negotiations
If ever there were an argument for Washington gridlock
So we're facing a "fiscal cliff," Ben Bernanke's term for the following things scheduled to take place on January 1, 2013.
Hardly a surprise, considering the vast sums flowing through the military
Getting rid of things like mortgage and charitable deductions wouldn't make a dent
We will soon find out if Chili Palmer was right when he said, "Sometimes you do your best work with a gun to your head."
Secures five-year deal worth more than $400 million
Writing in The New York Times, U.S. Naval Academy historian Aaron B. O'Connell worries that a paucity of veterans in Congress makes lawmakers apt to mindlessly "support the troops" and oppose cuts in military spending.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks