The Dangerous Lesson of Book Bans in Public School Libraries
An obscure Supreme Court case provides a roadmap through the curricular culture war.
An obscure Supreme Court case provides a roadmap through the curricular culture war.
Instead of attacking the student debt crisis at its source, the Biden administration is throwing money at the problem.
Video of presentations by the leaders of the Conservative, Libertarian, and Progressive Teams. Plus, my thoughts on a comparison of the three reports by Progressive Team leader Ned Foley.
Virtual learning was a policy choice, and the politicians who supported it are responsible.
A conversation with Eugene Volokh about the Shapiro controversy and political statements by university leaders
Are “extremely over-sensitive, Twitter activist people" ruining literature?
The university's own students are often not so lucky.
likely unconstitutional, holds a federal district court.
The Department of Education continues to forgive federal debt for attendees of shuttered for-profit schools.
The leading libertarian legal theorist talks about worrying trends at the Supreme Court as a conservative majority takes hold.
Arizona's new law should make alternative school arrangements more accessible than ever to families interested in educating their kids instead of funding bureaucracies.
Plus: stereotypes within libertarianism, and Katherine compares the editors to Buffy the Vampire Slayer characters.
A 6–3 majority sees it as noncoercive and not a violation of the Establishment Clause.
The article explains why the Supreme Court was right to hold that state voucher programs can’t discriminate against “sectarian” religious schools and addresses various objections.
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) is defending expression on campus and off as the ACLU becomes a progressive advocacy group.
The Biden administration just proposed new rules that would undermine basic fairness in college sexual misconduct disputes.
After 50 years, not only has Title IX failed to deliver on its promises for female athletes, it also made men's sports worse.
"It may be the case that [some American] children give up control of their attention when it's always managed by an adult," say some experts.
“A State violates the Free Exercise Clause when it excludes religious observers from otherwise available public benefits,” the Supreme Court held.
The decision is an important victory for both the principle of nondiscrimination and parents and students seeking better educational opportunities.
States may not "exclude some members of the community from an otherwise generally available public benefit because of their religious exercise,” says SCOTUS.
Transparency advocates say police could invoke a notorious loophole that allows them to hide records of deaths in custody and police killings.
With educational freedom at stake, these midterm elections could defy the odds and be constructive.
Students sued to protect their First and 14th Amendment rights.
So holds a federal district court, in a dispute arising from the school policy wars.
Big rulings are coming soon on school choice, guns, and abortion.
Perhaps the real question is whether such a school is a state actor for purposes of Section 1983. The en banc Fourth Circuit says it is, so that a skirt requirement for girls is unlawful.
His 2000 thesis on civil-rights-era Atlanta lifts passages from other people's work.
Plus: progressive groups imploding, stock and crypto markets plunging, and more.
Plus: trans teens, trouble at the FTC, and more...
The "victim-centered" training required by S.B. 2469 would compromise the impartiality of Title IX investigations.
What happened in Uvalde is part of a pattern, not an aberration.
Robb Elementary didn't need additional cops; it needed the cops on hand to actually do their jobs.
The longtime head of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education announces a new name and expanded mission for FIRE.
Under Biden, Trump, and Obama, government federal spending almost doubled.
Under the reasoning of the Georgetown University Office of Institutional Diversity, Equity & Affirmative Action (IDEAA) report in the Ilya Shapiro matter, a wide range of public speech criticizing religions, political parties, veterans, etc. could be "prohibit[ed] harassment."
"Further analysis shows that you’ve made it impossible for me to fulfill the duties of my appointed post," writes Shapiro.
The law school reinstated him on a technicality, but made it clear that they weren't going to uphold the university's free speech policy.
"She was holding back from sharing her story until now."
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10