Could Elite Colleges Embrace the SAT Again?
There's increasing evidence that standardized tests accurately measure student achievement and are helpful, not hurtful, to disadvantaged applicants.
There's increasing evidence that standardized tests accurately measure student achievement and are helpful, not hurtful, to disadvantaged applicants.
DEI statements are political litmus tests.
The next president should put more effort into fixing the college's abysmal free speech ranking.
When people from historically privileged groups are facing censorship, that doesn't mean people in historically marginalized groups are actually being empowered.
The author of Reform Nation explains how celebrity, philanthropy, and activism produced the most significant prison reform in decades.
The epidemiology of food and drink is a mess.
The epidemiology of food and drink is a mess.
How to battle identity politics and defend liberal values of universalism, free speech, and open inquiry
Econ Journal Watch asked academics with high citation counts to pick their most underappreciated article. I participated in the project, along with a number of prominent scholars from various disciplines.
The country's current struggles show the problems of the Beijing way—and make the case for freedom.
The guidelines would ignore decades of academic findings about how firm concentration can have a positive impact on consumers' welfare.
Thankfully, you don't need fancy dining halls or a college degree to have a good life or get a good job.
Some ideas that might help you make better use of the opportunities available to you in law school.
Political appointees should have no role in faculty hiring decisions.
"The greatest thing that ever happened to me was to be born in a free country of modest means and to have opportunities," says the Nobel Prize–winning economist.
Legal scholar and blogger Eric Segall puts forward several excellent suggestions.
Martha Pollack rejects the pernicious premise that universities should protect students from offensive ideas.
A defense of institutional neutrality.
Greetings from the second International Conspiracy Theory Symposium, where one of the most cited findings in the field has been debunked.
"Professors are not mouthpieces for the government," says FIRE's Joe Cohn. "For decades, the Supreme Court of the United States has defended professors' academic freedom from governmental intrusion."
The bill now bans a battery of poorly-defined "Critical Theory" concepts, and prevents schools from funding programs that promote "diversity, equity, and inclusion."
A NewYorker essay on why no one studies English anymore.
By an amazing coincidence, a current property dispute is occurring at the site of a storied property law case.
Florida's H.B. 999 claims to support "viewpoint diversity" and "intellectual rigor." It does just the opposite.
Amna Khalid and Jeffrey Aaron Snyder argue that we should not kid ourselves about the threat university DEI bureaucracies pose to academic freedom, but is there a better way?
Should conservatives worry about breaking the norm of political non-interference with state universities?
The Florida governor unveiled some big new ideas -- not all of them good
"Hamline subjected López Prater to the foregoing adverse actions because . . . she did not conform her conduct to the specific beliefs of a Muslim sect," the lawsuit states.
Jonathan Mitchell failed in his effort to become a legal academic, so he put his theories into practice instead.
U.S. News and World Report is making some significant changes to the way it ranks law schools.
These are the people who showed up when the economy was shut down by the government, working in jobs labeled "essential."
The journalist and comedian makes the case that "new puritans" espousing the religion of social justice have captured the Western world.
Andrew Doyle on the "new puritans" and their godawful religion of social justice.
Prominent social psychologist and NYU professor calls the requirement “explicitly ideological.”
The EconTalk host and Wild Problems author talks about the limits of cost-benefit analyses.
More universities than ever are now requiring lengthy DEI statements from job applicants. Is that good for academic freedom?
The intellectual watchdog keeps tabs on everyone from The 1619 Project's Nikole Hannah-Jones to Mises Institute's Hans-Hermann Hoppe in the name of serious scholarship.
The host of EconTalk and author of Wild Problems says our biggest decisions don't submit to easy cost-benefit analyses.
Some ideas that might help you make better use of the opportunities available to you in law school.
A new study sheds interesting light on these questions.
His 2000 thesis on civil-rights-era Atlanta lifts passages from other people's work.
Listen to an Intelligence Squared US debate featuring Nick Gillespie.
Doing away with standardized testing doesn't help low-income applicants gain entry to elite colleges.
What the John Mearsheimer controversy tells us about theory’s role in international affairs.
How the weaponization of sexual misconduct allegations wrecked Florian Jaeger's life and cost his university millions
The Love in the Time of Contagion author says sexual paranoia is on the rise.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks