10 Ways Trump's New Tariffs Will Piss You Off
And 1,300 more that will make you scratch your head.
And 1,300 more that will make you scratch your head.
Teachers have shut down schools across the state, allegedly to protest pension changes. But those pension reforms are pretty mild.
The greatest conflict of our time enters a new phase.
"No one wins in these tit-for-tat trade disputes, least of all the farmers and the consumers."
Whole Foods' John Mackey on why he's optimistic about American youth, his company's merger with Amazon, and the spread of 'conscious capitalism.'
"Those are traumatic increases. They are shocks to our system," says Mike Schmitt, CEO of The Metalworking Group, an Ohio-based manufacturer.
The American people will suffer more than the moguls in the steel industry will benefit.
Congress kneecapped minor league ballplayers' lawsuit with last week's omnibus bill. Even if that was the right thing to do, the way it was done is wrong.
People will find sources for what they want no matter what presumptuous regulators say.
The president wants his border wall funding.
The spending bill is a product of a broken, secretive, centralized legislative process.
A pro-tariff organization projects the best-case scenario for tariffs, and it still ends up looking pretty bad.
"There's not a day on the farm when a farmer doesn't touch steel," says Rep. David Young. And all that steel is about to get more expensive.
Four out of five voters agree that Washington has a spending problem, but a new omnibus spending bill will add yet more to the national debt.
Steel tariffs are likely to make prices rise further, particularly in markets where housing demand is already outpacing supply.
A beverage tax provokes a strange but predictable response.
Let's hope he mitigates the president's worst protectionist instincts.
From "bowling ball tests" to tariffs, the president doesn't know what he's talking about. His ignorance grows more dangerous each day.
In the final episode, we tackle how free markets break and make stuff.
"How bad will climate change be? Not very."
"Tariffs will inadvertently drive the price of American steel higher," says American Keg CEO Paul Czachor.
You cannot advocate trade restrictions without also advocating state-bestowed privilege.
If he believes this economically illiterate nonsense, he shouldn't be trusted to run the Department of Commerce. If he doesn't believe it, neither should you.
A 25 percent tariff on steel and a 10 percent tariff on aluminum will take effect in 15 days, unless GOP lawmakers take unusual steps to stop them.
"The rise of the Nordic welfare state has been a double-edged sword" for women's professional progress.
The benefits of a huge new tariff on steel will be highly concentrated in the steel industry, while the costs will be borne by other parts of the economy.
And the EU's response to the tariffs will whack workers who build motorcycles.
Given the state of the modern GOP, that's a very big "if." But the senator is trying for a vote again this week.
When it comes to trade, the president believes a lot of nonsense.
Senator tells Reason "most of the businesses in Kentucky are quite worried about a trade war." But will a weak Congress confront Trump?
John Stossel says voluntary, free trade improves lives.
The proposed tariffs are an exercise in ego, not economics.
It's right there in the North Carolina Constitution -- and the N.C. Supreme Court has just enforced it, in a case brought by a public employee, but potentially applicable to economic liberty claims brought by private businesses in the future.
President's hasty new "trade war" will damage the American economy while continuing his process of removing tariff-reduction from two-party politics.
He's made the party's economic agenda an extension of the culture wars.
And they'll make lots of other things more expensive too.
San Francisco rent control reduced affected rental housing by 15 percent while boosting citywide rents by 5 percent.
"It seems to me your argument doesn't have much weight."
The party's commitment to fiscal restraint and limited government have vanished
Janus v. AFSCME could end mandatory union dues payment. Counter-intuitively, it might strengthen the labor movement.
The social worker at the heart of Janus v. AFSCME explains why no public employee should be forced to pay union dues.
And the biggest liabilities don't even appear on the official balance sheet.
Are smart Roombas booby-trapped with bombs in our future?
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.