Equity and the Seventh Amendment
The scope of the civil jury trial right
Feeding the homeless, drawing the Prophet Muhammed, and Kim Kardashian's plea for executive clemency.
After police said Tibbetts' killer is an illegal immigrant, conservatives started using her death to argue for stricter immigration enforcement.
Is hush money to a politician's mistress "for the purpose of influencing an election" or "personal use"?
A question that now hangs like a miasma over D.C. is "Which of my staffers would hang me out to dry in order to avoid going to federal prison?"
At some level, the "void-for-breadth" doctrine already exists, but it needs to be excavated, clarified, and expanded.
The Wisconsin and Mississippi Supreme Courts have recently rejected state-level Chevron deference.
When a criminal law is extremely broad but perfectly clear, in what sense does it violate rule-of-law principles?
A program at UC-Davis looks at the relationship between capitalism and racism.
Ha! Science now has a non-shocking answer that question: Yes, of course, they are.
Repurposing "fair notice" principles to tackle an important aspect of overcriminalization.
An interesting case applying the private search reconstruction doctrine.
MacGyver, Rumpelstiltskin, and a whole bunch of attorneys behaving badly.
I agree with Glenn Reynolds (InstaPundit) -- this is indeed the best headline I've seen all the week.
For the second time this week, a federal court has rejected the EPA's effort to delay an Obama Administration rule.
An important ruling in the wake of Carpenter v. United States.
The Trump Administration faces another legal setback in its effort to reform federal environmental regulation.
A fun article by Jeff Breinholt, describing how judges (and which judges) have been citing rock lyrics.
GMU, another school well-represented on the blog, is #19, well above its U.S. News ranking.
A very interesting post by Ted Folkman (Letters Blogatory).
Reviews in New Blackfriars and the Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages
Prolonged hostilities, threatening to complain about the police, and officers who don't turn on their recording equipment.
A conversation with Nancy Rommelmann about her new true crime book, To the Bridge
Does the rise of data-driven authorship change our intuitions about intellectual property? Does it matter?
"The articles of impeachment charge Chief Justice Margaret Workman and Justices Robin Davis, Allen Loughry and Beth Walker with maladministration, corruption, incompetency, neglect of duty and certain high crimes." (The fifth Justice has already resigned.)
What does the rise of data-driven authorship mean for the future of art, culture, and intellectual property rights?
Title VI is not a disparate impact statute, and executive agencies do not have the authority to transform it into one through rulemaking.
The undisputed emperor of online adult entertainment, Mindgeek is a master at gathering and using data to structure and produce content.
I'm trying to put on a 2L/3L short writing competition -- just a week, for a short brief based on a short problem.
A 2016 Ohio appellate case I recently came across.
William Goldman famously said about Hollywood that "nobody knows anything." But thanks to streaming and the data it produces, Netflix knows a lot.
The Koch-Trump feud is just part of the conspiracy to amend the Constitution in talk show host Mark Levin's image.
Also known as the "Second Digital Disruption."
For the third time in the last three weeks, I've noticed federal court documents that were supposed to be filed sealed but weren't. UPDATE (Monday, Aug. 6): Just came across a fourth instance, in a state trial court.
Grenades, machine guns, 3D printed guns, a tranquilizer gun, machetes, duct tape, and a long blonde wig.
[I'm delighted that Profs. Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman, have passed along this response to the recent decision in the Emoluments Clause litigation against President Trump; naturally, I'd be delighted to post a response in turn from their adversaries. -EV]
A new study finds evidence that they do.
When do we decide that Trump's contempt for the law has crossed the line?
Motives matter under the law. So what was the College of Charleston's motive for its sudden change?
Noted appellate attorney Lisa Blatt on why she supports the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh, and shows how we should evaluate judicial nominees from the other side of the aisle.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10