Short Circuit: A Roundup of Recent Federal Court Decisions
A barbaric sentence, unpurged voters, and a porcine gag order.
A barbaric sentence, unpurged voters, and a porcine gag order.
For those of us who remember State v. Reeves, the Tennessee attempted-poisoning case discussed in the very popular Dressler Criminal Law casebook.
Candidates used to let political operatives do the dirty work so they could appear above it all. Not Trump.
Their having dated in law school was well-known, but the proposal was not.
Plus: Halloween Netflix recommendations and a glimpse of Trump trick-or-treating.
In short, probably not. And about that ADL study everyone is citing...
Weeds, word counts, and would-be blood donors.
What seems to be a real radio ad put out by the McCaskill campaign.
A letter from Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.
What more could you want from a sentencing guideline decision out of a U.S. Court of Appeals?
There's no evidence this caravan is full of Middle Eastern terrorists.
It's fine for ideological groups to try to teach their ideas, including to interested future law clerks -- but not to try to limit how the students use those ideas.
Root canals, contraband dogs, and a marijuana petition.
When genetic testing results become a tool for law enforcement
Jim Lindgren proposes a constitutional amendment banning court-packing. I'm all for it. But it can only pass if liberal Democrats get some reciprocal concession to support it.
Public defender shortfalls, warrantless rental inspections, and juveniles in solitary confinement.
The burden of proof matters, and it's an issue of first impression in appellate courts.
But the ruling isn't based on free speech or religious liberty
Oddly enough, not in The Onion!
Seeking help from our readers ....
This is how the system is supposed to work.
As if we needed any more evidence that the vast majority of undocumented immigrants aren't bringing crime into the country.
Plus: fight against FOSTA continues and Tennessee trooper reports Democrat for visiting falafel restaurant.
Efforts to help ex-offenders by making it difficult for employers to find out about a job applicant's criminal record can backfire.
Predictions to that effect may turn out to be overblown. But we should still take the threat of "court-packing" and other drastic measures to to reduce the Court's power seriously.
I have a contribution in it, along with a variety of prominent legal scholars and commentators.
"Ginsburg Forgets 14th Amendment, Audience Has To Give Her Constitution," says a Daily Wire headline -- but the story doesn't mention this was section 2,
I don't sign such letters unless I fully agree with every assertion made.
Butter grades, toxic coal ash, and Stairway to Heaven.
... and the conservative Federalist Society is named after legislative history.
Further thoughts on why Kavanaugh's testimony is disqualifying.
Kavanaugh was correct: it was a circus. But he was the one who made it a circus - and for that (apart from anything that he may or may not have done in 1982) he should not be confirmed.
Contrary to the fears of some pundits, the U.S. is not on the brink of civil war. But the explanation for that is far from entirely reassuring.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10