Giuliani as a Cybersecurity Advisor for Donald Trump Does Not Bode Well
He talks about data protection, but does he understand it at all?
He talks about data protection, but does he understand it at all?
More federal employees will have access to raw intel data gathered without warrants.
What happens when you add free whiskey to a discussion about the intel community's weak Russia-hacking report?
Please stop ignoring that government officials have agendas.
Say goodbye to 2016. But don't let your guard down.
License plate readers, facial recognition software, and registration suspensions-a dangerous combination.
A battle over license-plate readers is brewing in Virginia.
A best-selling Chinese science fiction series on how to survive aliens and authoritarians comes to America.
Report may be out by next month.
Secret snooping gets slightly less so.
Opportunity to limit government surveillance power missed.
Soon shopping malls and theaters can run surveillance images through an app to access state, federal, and international law enforcement watch-lists.
Your tax-deductible donations will help us keep a close eye on the surveillance state.
One warrant and one judge can lead to untold numbers of system intrusions.
Nestled deep in the Investigatory Powers Bill is the authority to mandate encryption "back doors."
A level of snooping every autocrat in the world will admire.
The departing director of national intelligence had no respect for our rights, no problem lying about it, and no apparent ability to do the basics of his job right.
The sites are thought to have accounted for roughly half of all child porn websites on the dark web.
Whistleblower doesn't worry about whether there will be a deal for his return.
This is going to end up in some very bad places.
Lawsuit settlement over city's unwarranted snooping of Muslims temporarily rejected.
New Russian anti-encryption and data retention laws look sadly familiar.
If we're not willing to rein in law enforcement, why should a telecom company?
Maybe focus on protecting American data, not seeking revenge for Clinton's embarrassment?
Hold law enforcement responsible for snooping, not the tech platforms.
Sources say Yahoo let government malware scan the contents of all emails sent to Yahoo accounts. And why would the feds stop with Yahoo?
Government officials arguing against privacy protections are learning their importance in the most embarrassing ways possible.
This all happened last year, even after Snowden's revelations and government reforms.
Officials likely abuse access to government info databases on a daily basis.
Who will actually be defining the agenda, because it won't be these two?
Another case where calls for 'mass snooping' ignore other avenues for information.
Newspaper demands less government transparency.
House Intel Committee says he was no whistleblower.
Group lists safeguards governments should follow before hacking citizens.
The Justice Dept. doesn't think we need to know when they're looking at info about us.
Cameras attached to the bottom of a small plane can capture an area of roughly 30 square miles at any given time, transmitting real-time images to the ground.
An internal bypass mechanism in the Windows booting process makes it out into 'the wild.'
The cellphone tracking instrument has had questionable success.
It wasn't just one party who set up a system Trump could use to snoop on his enemies.
"In Russia, the legislation is compared to the USA Patriot Act."
The infamous concept of 'balance' rears its head.
Government would be able to demand tech companies provide data access.
On immigration, surveillance, torture, and press freedom, Trump's ideas are not just bad-they're unconstitutional.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks