If Pseudonyms, Then What Kind? How About "Doe WHBE 3"?
Should pseudonymous litigants, and any precedents set in their cases, be known by the initials of the law firms that represent them?
Should pseudonymous litigants, and any precedents set in their cases, be known by the initials of the law firms that represent them?
X's child porn detection system doesn’t violate an Illinois biometric privacy law, the judge ruled.
The plaintiffs are challenging the state's widespread surveillance, which it collects through over 600 cameras.
While drones are less likely to shoot or maim innocent civilians, they could also pose privacy issues.
Decades of legislation have chipped away at the financial privacy Americans believe they still have.
Digital payments are easy to use, but also to monitor and block.
From tattoos to abortions to gender expression, a confusing mess of laws govern which Americans are considered adults.
The intelligence community is admitting that info from data brokers is sensitive but isn’t accepting hard limits on how to use it.
The Department of Justice indicted the creators of Samourai Wallet, an application that helps people spend their bitcoins anonymously.
The government always has seemingly good reasons to sidestep people’s rights.
Columbia law professor David Pozen recalls the controversy provoked by early anti-drug laws and the hope inspired by subsequent legal assaults on prohibition.
The 9th Circuit determined that forcibly mashing a suspect's thumb into his phone to unlock it was akin to fingerprinting him at the police station.
The Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act would prevent law enforcement and intelligence agencies from purchasing data that they would otherwise need a warrant to obtain.
An interview with Consumer Choice Center Deputy Director Yaël Ossowski.
The measure would have required federal agents to get a warrant before searching American communications collected as part of foreign intelligence.
Kentucky's governor signed a law last week that could require porn sites to ask for users' government IDs before allowing access to adult material.
The court reverses a contrary trial court decision.
A Section 702 reauthorization moving through Congress could actually weaken privacy protections.
"To the extent that Kavadia asks the Court to order that public reporting about this case be removed from the Internet, such an order would blatantly violate the First Amendment."
The law would require platforms to use invasive measures to prevent most teenagers under 16 from making social media accounts and bar all minors from sexually explicit sites.
Modern cars are smartphones on wheels, but with less protection for your data.
And in the process, it will stifle innovation and competition.
The company leaves Texas over an “ineffective, haphazard, and dangerous” age-verification law.
Are you in compliance with the Corporate Transparency Act? Have you even heard of it?
A federal judge in an ongoing case called the porn age-check scheme unconstitutional. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton doesn't seem to care.
Byron Tau's Means of Control documents how the private sector helps government agencies keep tabs on American citizens.
Many apps collect data that is then accessed by outside entities. Should you care?
Interest in virtual private networks provides insights into a global battle over digital freedom.
A new letter from Sen. Ron Wyden (D–Ore.) reveals that the agency admitted the practice nearly three years ago but would not allow him to reveal it.
Congress gave FISA’s Section 702 a brief lease on life, but civil liberties concerns haven’t gone away.
Laws like Utah's would require anyone using social media to prove their age through methods such as submitting biometric data or a government-issued ID.
While not perfect, the move is a step in the right direction for civil liberties.
Your Face Belongs to Us documents how facial recognition might threaten our freedom.
Facial recognition technology is increasingly being deployed by police officers across the country, but the scope of its use has been hard to pin down.
New online database details the shocking extent of intrusive surveillance tech used by American police.
“The victims may not have been persecuted or tortured due to the data breach yet, but the likelihood of those outcomes has increased due to ICE’s conduct.”
Section 702 will continue until April, when Congress will have another shot at seriously reforming a program that desperately needs it.
Three major pharmacy chains admitted to encouraging staff to hand prescription records over to law enforcement without a warrant, and without a legal review.
Plus: White supremacists and plagiarism, Milei and shock therapy, checking in on California, and more...
One bill set to be considered would grow the scope of federal digital surveillance and would authorize the federal government to use those powers against more individuals.
Lawmakers should consider a user-fee system designed to charge drivers by the mile.
The bipartisan Government Surveillance Reform Act would stop a lot of warrantless surveillance as a condition for renewal of Section 702 authorities.
The government treats its endless appetite for information about citizens as more important than people's ability to conduct business in a normal fashion.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10