Trump Administration Lawyer Pummeled by Sotomayor and Gorsuch in Cellphone Tracking Case
"Most Americans, I think, still want to avoid Big Brother."
"Most Americans, I think, still want to avoid Big Brother."
Congress might quietly expand the feds' surveillance powers without any actual debate.
What's at issue today in Carpenter v. United States.
A cellphone tracking case gives SCOTUS a chance to reconsider a doctrine that threatens everyone's privacy.
Congress must make a choice before the end of the year on the level of protections Americans get from unwarranted snooping.
Every attempt to restrain and reform unwarranted domestic surveillance batted away.
Another possible standoff where officials want to compromise everybody's data security.
House leadership rejects stronger protections shielding Americans from unwarranted snooping.
Will snooping reauthorizations just get quietly dumped into a spending bill?
The Fourth Amendment matters to some legislators.
A right to engage in prostitution seems like "a natural extension of Supreme Court precedent," says judge.
Activists fear secret surveillance. Push for firmly enforced rules instead of bans.
What Rosenstein wants would threaten data security. That's hardly responsible.
Microsoft resisted order for emails on servers in Ireland.
The web host can redact user info unless the Justice Department provides evidence of criminal activity.
BuzzFeed reports federal agencies violating the rules to engage in warrantless domestic snooping of financial information.
The backdoor, warrantless searches won't end, but will see new limits.
Amber Rudd admits that she doesn't understand encryption while insisting on the need to undermine it.
Responses to top-down federal dictates are hard to predict.
Homeland Security officials seize and snoop into thousands of phones and laptops without any evidence of criminal activity.
FBI, Intel want broad snooping powers to stay intact. That may not be an option.
Unanimous ruling protects bodily autonomy, could help decriminalize homosexuality
A fishing expedition to try to track down anybody who disrupted Inauguration Day events in D.C.
Reason editors discuss Democracy in Chains, the future of privacy, Freedom Fest, and Trump's pardoning power.
Authorities look for new ways to hold others responsible for overdoses and throw them in jail.
You must submit your credit card number-for the safety of the children!
Government authorities refuse to consider uncontrollable, dangerous consequences of breaking data privacy.
Another nugget of privacy threatened in the name of national security.
Legislature aiming at a scary precedent.
On the pretext of texting safety, they want to give cops free rein to suspend licenses and fine drivers without charges or conviction.
Film favors martyrdom over careful analysis.
Some legislators want more privacy protections from unwarranted snooping of U.S. citizens.
Trump and group of GOP senators don't want us to have greater privacy protections from unwarranted domestic surveillance.
Comey stood up to the Bush administration over illegal snooping, but as FBI director he defended surveillance.
Trio of judges reject request by school district to put ban back in place.
Welcome to the club! Now let us tell you how to fix it.
City tax collector wants to post home addresses of drivers online.
More than 150 million phone call records of Americans were collected in 2016.
No more gathering communications from Americans that were 'about' a foreign target.
Country requires companies to collect and store mass amounts of citizen metadata. Abuses are inevitable.
Porn performers are accusing Rashida Jones and other Hot Girls Wanted: Turned On producers of a host of unethical and exploitative practices.
This week in 'Privacy for me but not for thee.'
Have a friend visiting from another country? DHS wants to know your connections.
If Susan Rice's request to unmask Americans' names was legal, should the rules be changed?
A wave of new technologies is making it easier for us all to flip the bird to regulators and prohibitionists.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks