Economist Bryan Caplan, former National Association of Home Builders Director Jerry Howard, and I will speak at event sponsored by the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University.
Plus: Europoor discourse, NPR's woke CEO, a forgotten tech panic, and more...
The long-time public radio editor's resignation proves he was right all along.
The Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act would prevent law enforcement and intelligence agencies from purchasing data that they would otherwise need a warrant to obtain.
"Profound irreparable harm flows from the Act's chilling of adults' access to protected sexual expression," the filing reads.
A couple of circuit court decisions noted that the intervenors had to have a concrete plan to write about the records; the court here makes clear that such a plan indeed suffices for standing.
Kansas had among the most lax civil asset forfeiture laws in the country, but a bill sent to the governor's desk would strengthen protections for property owners.
An interview with Consumer Choice Center Deputy Director Yaël Ossowski.
Under a legal theory endorsed by the 5th Circuit, Martin Luther King Jr. could have been liable for other people’s violence.
The Supreme Court's interpretation of the statute also could affect two charges against Donald Trump.
It's a good thing opponents of the move can appeal to the liberal values of free speech, free association, and equal treatment under law.
The Court allows takings suit against Texas to proceed under state law, but doesn't resolve question of whether the Takings Clause is "self-executing."
In 2021, the Associated Press uncovered rampant sexual abuse at FCI Dublin. After three years of failing to fix the problem, the Bureau of Prisons is shutting it down.
How a use tax on mifepristone might scramble abortion debates.
"Dr. Morrison brought this lawsuit. He chose to challenge the accuracy of these statements in a public courtroom. If disclosing the allegedly-defamatory statements invades his privacy or causes him injury, it is solely the result of his own actions and decisions."
The push to regulate social media content infringes on rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment.
based on state sealing law. The lawsuit is against a current Vermont legislator, and alleges the defendant had aided and abetted the sexual assault of the then-16-to-17-year-old plaintiff in 1968-70.
Plus: A listener asks the editors for examples of tasks the government does well (yikes).
"I told everybody, 'Do what you want,'" Trump said on Friday night, as he let the deep state win again.
Reproductive freedom initiatives are advancing toward November ballots, putting the matter of abortion access in voters' hands.
One viewer said it should be illegal to take the Lord's name in vain on TV—and that was one of the more coherent complaints.
U.S. need for Australia’s cooperation in the Pacific may win the journalist’s release.
"She prioritizes highlighting the intersectionality that comes with the environmental justice movement to achieve collective liberation for all oppressed communities. In her spare time, she enjoys holding elected officials accountable, watching endless amounts of movies, television series and sports, and enjoying time outdoors with her family and friends."
The decision is unanimous, though some related issues have been left for later resolution.
The measure would have required federal agents to get a warrant before searching American communications collected as part of foreign intelligence.
Fight back through better information and discourse, not by empowering the government.
whether at administrators' homes or in law school classrooms.
Kentucky's governor signed a law last week that could require porn sites to ask for users' government IDs before allowing access to adult material.
And they're still trying to censor speech on social media.
The case hinged on statutory interpretation, not the merits of the state's 1864 ban.
"What's the most effective way for law students to fight injustice?"
Martin Kulldorff talks about his dismissal from Harvard Medical School, persisting college vaccine mandates, and surviving COVID-era censorship on the latest episode of Just Asking Questions.
Plus: A fight over Section 702 spying reforms, Iran threatens Israel and the U.S., Trump's proposed tariff is even worse than we thought, and more...
If adopted by the Supreme Court, Prof. Candeub's approach would be a grave menace to freedom of speech.
The court reverses a contrary trial court decision.
Sandy Martinez faces that bill because of driveway cracks, a storm-damaged fence, and cars parked on her own property that illegally touched her lawn.
A Section 702 reauthorization moving through Congress could actually weaken privacy protections.
Plus: Defunding NPR, defending Lionel Shriver, and more...
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10
