N.Y. law provides for some judicial review of private universities' actions, when a university fails to "adhere[] to its own published rules," thus rendering its "actions were arbitrary or capricious"; but that standard, the court holds, wasn't met here.
"I was not panicking as I know the roads and know he is mature enough to walk there without incident," says Brittany Patterson.
U.S. District Judge Stephen McGlynn says the law bans firearms covered by the Second Amendment and is not supported by historical precedent.
A new "inactivity reboot" protects data from thieves and helps preserve due process.
Supposedly targeted at immigrants and travelers, the program endangers everybody’s liberty.
Under this restrictive measure, there will be no exceptions, even for parental consent.
In bodycam footage, the police major—now the deputy chief—asks for "anything we can get" after being told felony charges would be difficult.
Veritas had been suspended from Twitter for including an interview subject's house number; CNN "suggested on-air that Twitter banned Veritas for 'promoting misinformation.'"
The justices, including Trump's nominees, have shown they are willing to defy his will when they think the law requires it.
Michiganders had to choose between a hawkish Democrat with an intelligence background and a hawkish Republican with an intelligence background for Senate.
Coercing defendants into plea deals is poor training for convincing people to vote for you.
In his second term, the former and future president will have more freedom to follow his worst instincts.
Most of these weren't close calls at all.
A long-delayed conviction illustrates the difficulty of holding cops accountable for abusing their powers.
The decades-old regulation imposes burdens that no other media outlets are subject to.
In this Texas Law Review article, Josh Braver and I argue that most exclusionary zoning violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
Former Louisville detective Brett Hankison is one of four officers who faced federal charges after a deadly 2020 drug raid.
No matter who wins, we can expect bad policies surrounding sex and especially surrounding technology.
The Republican presidential candidate argues that CBS and The Washington Post broke the law by covering the election in ways he did not like.
After being arrested for doing journalism, Priscilla Villarreal has taken her fight to the courts.
The latest podcast episode from Prof. Jane Bambauer (Florida) and me.
Inhumane labor practices, worker deaths, and the forced eviction and repression of local residents have characterized the kingdom's efforts to build a miles-long linear skyscraper in the desert.
Fort the answer—or rather, answers—a court has to resolve a choice of law question.
The judges divide over whether a challenge to a law limiting the number of bullets in a magazine is likely to succeed. Is next stop the Supreme Court?
Washington's Covenant Homeownership Program excludes certain applicants on the basis of race.
Campaign finance records reveal what the community at the heart of U.S. national security policy thinks about outside politics.
A new article from the Daedalus (Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences) Future of Free Speech Symposium.
Plus: Andrew Cuomo's potential prosecution, Texas death blamed on abortion ban, and more...
A new article from the Daedalus (Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences) Future of Free Speech Symposium.
Federal agents are allowed to search private property without a warrant under this Prohibition-era Supreme Court precedent.
A university president provides a helpful explanation of the difference.
The Stony Brook sociologist discusses how progressives are having a hard time processing why more and more black and Latino voters are supporting Donald Trump.
The groups are challenging a Florida law that bans some teens from social media.
By prosecuting the website's founders, the government chilled free speech online and ruined lives.
A review of Prof. Mary Anne Franks' new book, Fearless Speech: Breaking Free from the First Amendment (plus a response by Prof. Franks to Prof. Mchangama's Tweeted criticisms, and a reply by Prof. Mchangama).
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks