Hillary's Gun Proposals Assault the Constitution
Clinton wants to make gun manufacturers financially liable for misuse of their products and require background checks for all gun transfers.
Clinton wants to make gun manufacturers financially liable for misuse of their products and require background checks for all gun transfers.
Not what People wants them to think.
Would losing the 2nd Amendment be more 'devastating' than losing innocent lives?
Schools have lost their minds.
Guns - and the Second Amendment - won't just disappear.
Campus speech and sex repression likely to continue, but there's some good news
Cartoon rabbit, unlike New York developer, understands the 'the sanctity of the American home'
Breitbart writer Milo Yiannopoulos also banned; both said to violate "safe space" policy.
FFS, don't authors want to be quoted? Isn't that the whole goddamned point?
Trump tried to seize an elderly widow's home via eminent domain.
The New York Times, in a not-so-subtle slam against gun rights, says he did.
Like the president, the presumptive Democratic nominee assumes we can identify mass shooters before they strike.
In Fox News interview, GOP frontrunner once again shows contempt for individual rights
ACLU alarmed at idea that every bit of public info might feed into these high-tech "credit scores" that will define Chinese citizens' lives.
"...regardless of Rand Paul's campaign." You got that right, brother.
What happened to gun control from 2000 to 2012? Funny you should ask...
Talking about mass shootings, the president cited data on suicides.
National Review writer blames U.S. bombing of hospital in Kunduz on...Taliban
What The New Yorker gets wrong about guns and the Constitution.
Increasingly sophisticated homemade guns are so entrenched cops fear their use by organized crime, so now let's fret over desktop weapons of mass destruction.
First-time drug offenders are coerced into becoming informants on the campus of Ole Miss.
More background checks, more assault weapon bans, more suits against gun makers and sellers, and expanding group of people to whom gun ownership bans apply.
Is there a war on childhood?
They are as safe or safer than other places and help make local law enforcement more effective.
School is supposed to teach kids to think critically. Instead, they encounter instead a system that is arbitrary, harsh, and ineffective at teaching.
How would the government enforce a limit on the number of firearms people may possess?
Their profile is shared by many people who never kill anyone.
The only defender guaranteed to be present at any attack against you is you.
But grant hungry activists and vice squads want you to think they are.
Last week President Obama asked us to compare terrorism to gun violence. Maybe we should.
With the police still withholding evidence, their behavior during and after the "biker massacre" and mass arrests still very suspicious.
Obama's talk of common-sense gun safety laws don't seem to apply to this tragedy.
No, you don't have to have the state's approval to tell families how to solve problems.
Anti-trafficking efforts includes everything from offering or soliciting paid sex, to living with a sex worker, to running a classified advertising website.
Suspension not reversed
Wants less shouting, more good policy.
Any attempt to stop would-be murderers from buying guns is bound to be overinclusive, underinclusive, or both.
How can we know simple gun safety laws would help when we know nothing about circumstances of how the killer got the gun?
The U.N. has no idea how to combat cyberbullying.
Commissioner Bratton says new database could become "national template" for police transparency.
A North Dakota drug task force bullied a college student into working for them. Then he turned up dead.
How five 20th century economists subtly remade the political landscape