Radio

Friday A/V Club: Fascism vs. Socialism vs. Communism vs. Democracy

Lawrence Dennis, Norman Thomas, A.J. Muste, and Raymond Moley debate the ideal social system.

|

Here's a remarkable recording from 1935, just a couple of years into the New Deal era. It's the debut episode of the radio show America's Town Meeting of the Air, and it features four Americans making the case for different social systems. Speaking for fascism: the eccentric Old Right writer Lawrence Dennis. Speaking for socialism: the Socialist Party's perennial presidential candidate, Norman Thomas. Speaking for communism: the leader of the American Workers Party, A.J. Muste. And speaking for capitalism: nobody, because the fourth path represented here is not "capitalism" but "democracy," which is kind of unfair to Norman Thomas, who also supported democratic government. Anyway. Speaking for democracy: Raymond Moley, one of FDR's original Brain Trust.

Each panelist addresses the microphone for about 10 minutes, and then there's a roundtable discussion. Dennis leads off with the case for fascism, which to Dennis means a "planned economy" that still "respects some private property rights" (though those rights should be seen as "mere licenses"); in theory he doesn't reject democracy any more than Moley or Thomas does, but his "new ideal of democracy will be an efficient executive state." Thomas is also high on planning, but he wants to abolish "the profit system" and private ownership of productive property. Muste opens by invoking the founding fathers—not a habit of communists today—and then calls for expropriating "the czars of industry and finance." And Moley makes an anti-utopian case for constitutional democracy, suggesting that the other ideologies onstage are forms of escapism, not serious ways to muddle through our problems. You can listen to the whole thing here.

Super-Pilgrim can shoot lightning bolts from his hand and head.

About a year after this program aired, Muste would abandon communism for Christian pacifism. Following World War II, Dennis would move away from fascism, embracing instead a quirky sort of individualism. (In Prophets on the Right, Ronald Radosh quotes the latter-day Dennis calling for a capitalism of "the dissenters, the rebels and nonconformists whose main motivations were not profit or money-making but either religious or intellectual self-expression, freedom and independence.") Moley never abandoned democracy, but he did become a fierce critic of his former boss Franklin Roosevelt, adopting a more free-market view of the world and eventually contributing to the libertarian-leaning magazine The Freeman. Only Norman Thomas refused to budge from his mid-'30s persona, though he did eventually stop running for president.

And in 1964, the hour those four spent talking together would be rebroadcast on the wonderfully weird Seattle station KRAB-FM, which is why the recording has now resurfaced at the KRAB Archive. That site has posted yet more information about the program here, including this intriguing comment from the radio historian David Goodman:

In 1948, on the five hundredth edition of [America's Town Meeting of the Air], the program returned to the question posed on the first broadcast. But this time there was no possibility of having communists or fascists speak for themselves. [The moderator] made it clear in his introduction that communism and fascism were forms of totalitarianism and that "we are not impressed by the propaganda demands of the advocates of totalitarianism to use the principles of democracy to advance the cause of a form of government which would destroy those principles." The speakers chosen to talk about communism and fascism were vigorous opponents of those doctrines.

(For more on the KRAB Archive, go here. For past editions of the Friday A/V Club, go here.)

Advertisement

NEXT: Total Abortion Ban Reinstated in Dominican Republic

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Link to the recording:

    http://www.krab.fm/playlist2/A…..05-30.html

  2. Just noting the oddity of the article author calling the act of calling out communism and fascism as totalitarian perspectives “quirky.” Was it a sarcastic hit at how the PBS of then was so much less PC than the PBS from the ’60’s to today?

    1. I don’t know what you’re referring to. The only time the word “quirky” appears here is my description of Dennis’ latter-day political views.

      1. I stand corrected! Your word choice was “intriguing,” and my minds quirky recollection reflex translated it to quirky. I own the privilege of my old laptop and home internet access, and the typing the wrong word in the above post.

        But, having your attention-thanks for an interesting article, as I am very interested in both Americas specific intellectual / political growth history, and intellectual and political history in general. So – apart from contentious approval or condemnation of “PC” – do you happen to agree that the commentators’ description shows how the PBS of then was so much less PC than the PBS from the ’60’s to today?

        1. PBS didn’t exist then; the 1948 broadcast was on the ABC radio network. I guess I’d say that broadcasters had a somewhat different set of taboos then than now; “PC” feels like too anachronistic a term to apply to that era.

          1. Noticed the NBC Blue credit on the image. ABC (est. 1944) was pretty new in 1948, but it came from NBC Blue after those FCC busybodies stuck their noses everywhere.

  3. Fascinating. I wasn’t familiar with Lawrence Dennis, but in this recording he sounded like a pretty run-of-the-mill commenter at Reason.com

  4. Dang Jesse, you have a way of loading up my listening cue like no other author here.

  5. Muste at the time was, I believe, a Trotskyite. He starts his speech by disavowing connection with the regular (Soviet-satellite) Communist Party.

    The speaking lineup basically represents the range of views which used to be considered acceptable in the universities – before the universities decided there would be no range of views whatever.

    Muste’s account of the hierarchy of elected workers’ councils leading up to a Congress, and a planning commission, reminds me of the “we are an anarcho-syndicalist commune” speech by the peasant in Monty Python.

  6. Oh, and in the picture, who’s the Quaker with the belt and the swastika armband?

    1. Oh, I hadn’t seen the alt-text when I wrote that.

    2. He is the “town crier” that announced the program in the early years.

  7. “Only Norman Thomas refused to budge from his mid-’30s persona…”

    A socialist who is intransigent? Unpossible!

  8. Fascinating stuff, Jesse.

  9. Well all four of those forms of government are bad. I sort of like what our founding fathers original set up until our leaders changed it. You remember; Senators appointed by the states, property owners only could vote and birthright citizenship only to childern of citizens. A federal government that only regulates commerce between the states and protected against foreign attack. A Supreme Court that only addressed whether Congressional laws were constitutional and a President who only enforced those laws and acted as Commander in Chief during war.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.