Some Pundits Say There's No Campus Free Speech 'Crisis.' Here's Why They're Wrong.
"Everything we think about the political correctness debate is wrong," says Vox's Matt Yglesias. Not exactly.
"Everything we think about the political correctness debate is wrong," says Vox's Matt Yglesias. Not exactly.
Declining support for unfettered debate among politicians, academics, and the public doesn't bode well for the future of free speech.
Recent events such as the student walkout to promote gun control raise the issue of how much credibility we should give to the political views of the young, and victims of crime. At least as a general rule, there is no reason to give those views any special credence.
"Border searches never require a warrant or probable cause."
"If voters are making [stupid] decisions," says Senior Editor Jacob Sullum, "that's not the Russians' fault."
Nobody has the right to force bakers to print speech they hate. The debate is over what counts as speech.
Rep. Michelle DuBois wants to remove a statehouse sign that reads "General Hooker Entrance" because it is an affront to "women's dignity."
Under Stalin, people could be killed for carrying joke books about him. They did it anyway.
ACLU steps in to fight zoning regulations that appear to let officials veto art based on content.
A web developer's First Amendment lawsuit says Sibley, Iowa, officials conspired to silence him.
"Would that be allowed by the administration?"
He "let the American people down and also the citizens of Florida," according to Sen. Chuck Grassley.
For months, Penn Law has resisted calls to punish Amy Wax for her public comments on race. Yesterday, they caved.
"It's about keeping people safe."
"We do not do this lightly, but they have repeatedly posted content designed to incite animosity and hatred against minority groups."
Rallying to call for restrictive laws is a whole lot easier than getting people to submit to them.
Raising the purchase age for guns won't stop mass shooters but will hurt law-abiding Americans.
Princeton University's Keith Whittington explains why it is sometimes wise -- even necessary -- to expose students to potentially offensive material
Can public housing authorities strip you of your Second Amendment rights?
Marking the 54th anniversary of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
The anonymous plaintiff offers a pretty compelling factual story -- but the legal analysis is surprisingly unsettled.
A lawsuit leads to a suggestion that the president engage in a kinder, gentler ignoring.
Sloppy thoughts, sloppy policies.
The foul ups by the Broward County Sheriff's Office don't inspire confidence.
Politicians love to find scapegoats for mass shootings, especially if it lets them exonerate law enforcement and the social welfare state.
That is what students at the University of Miami School of Law are reporting. [EARLIER UPDATE: The Dean tells me that things are more complicated than at first reported, and they're trying to see if things can be worked out; I hope to have more from the Dean in a few days.] [UPDATE 3/15: The University has agreed to pay the security fee.]
Canvassing the legal problems and practical effects of qualified immunity from constitutional lawsuits
It's not just the Second Amendment in their crosshairs.
Rybka has spent the past several years as a protegee of pickup artist and seduction coach Alex Lesley-and picked up a plausible claim to 2016 election dirt along the way.
Michigan public accommodations law bans discrimination based on age by businesses open to the public, including retailers.
Pedantry may be annoying, but sloppy firearms legislation is a lot worse.
A very interesting piece by Stanford Prof. Michael McConnell on the Masterpiece Cakeshop case.
The Department of Justice's loophole lets officials seize property without having to get a conviction.
Oregon law generally bans discrimination in selling goods based on age, so this lawsuit looks like a winner.
Can the government prevent drug firms from telling patients true facts about the medicine they prescribe?
This could result in a ruling overturning a terrible 1985 decision that makes it very difficult to bring takings cases in federal court.
Age restrictions, body armor bans, and constitutional carry.
Device makers would be required to block porn, prostitution hubs, and all content that fails "current standards of decency."
This arbitrary category of firearms is not distinguished by rate of fire or muzzle velocity.
Best known as the "father of Harlem," he was guided by the theory that free markets penalize bigotry.
Progressives push their luck with their totalitarian insistence that everybody is with them or against them on guns and so much else.
Cody Wilson on his war against power, the irreversible course of the 3D-printed gun, and America's Weimar moment
How to make an assault weapon ban look effective: include handgun murders
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks