CIA Encryption Meddling and Chinese Espionage Allegations Make It Clear: We All Need Strong Data Protection
Somebody tell the FBI and Congress.
Somebody tell the FBI and Congress.
"The district court should not be a party to concealing this information from the public, especially as it concerns an arbitration organization that holds itself out to the public as impartial. These documents would be useful to the public in evaluating the true extent to which the organization is impartial."
In Broward County, judges almost never reject police petitions for gun confiscation orders.
An update on that Connecticut unsealing case.
The former New York mayor is being called a racist for his former support of searching young minorities without cause.
Despite concerns about efficacy and side effects, courts are slow to act on behalf of patients who don’t want the treatment.
Attorney General Xavier Becerra announced action against the department.
Plus: Sanders tops Biden in new national poll, how federal housing policy is getting families evicted, and more...
Your cellphone is tracking your movements and, despite legal protections, federal, state, and local officials are finding new and disturbing ways to use that information.
Dwain Barton says Officer Dean Vann illegally entered his home and used excessive force while arresting him without probable cause.
(and perhaps to other government records).
Four Second Circuit judges gave fair use victories (separately) to rapper Drake and blogger Sargon of Akkad, concluding that defendants' uses of plaintiffs' work to comment on it and criticize it were fair use and thus not copyright infringement.
The Chinese Communist Party confiscated a sacred meteorite from Muslim herders. They're suing to get it back.
In several cases, victims received higher bonds than criminal defendants and were forced to serve jail time.
Plus: Maybe Buttigieg didn't win Iowa? Vermont considers decriminalizing prostitution. Customs and Border Protection gets a status change. And more...
Episode 10 of Free Speech Rules, a video series by UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh
The university disallowed the testimony of witnesses who would have undermined the accuser's credibility.
It’s all part of the international push by officials to monitor the public. You’re next.
The city's overzealous commission has ordered the company to stop selling dolls some said were racial caricatures.
"Say what you will about ISIS but at least they're not Islamophobic." Journalist Andrew Doyle has created the ultimate parody account.
If a motion to recuse argues that the judge has a conflict of interest because she owns particular property, can the judge order the redaction of all the details related to the location of the property?
Efforts to control the flow of information fail, but they muddle the quality of what people share in defiance of the censors.
"We need to stop this generation of big tech companies from profiting off of lies to the American people," the candidate told PEN America.
What’s at stake in Michigan v. Wood
A clear First Amendment violation, I think -- but it's the law in Tennessee.
Such inflammatory exaggeration seems designed to avoid a substantive discussion of the presidential candidate's gun control proposals.
The billionaire former three-term mayor of New York panders to Democratic loyalists rather than laying out a vision for a prosperous, tolerant America.
Online platforms would have to "earn" speech protections by compromising encryption—all in the name of fighting child porn.
GOP attacks on internet smut are heating up, but the porn industry has more practical threats to worry about.
40 privacy advocacy groups send open letter to agency
Plus: Santa Cruz decriminalizes shrooms, the feds target medical marijuana in Michigan, "the growing threat to free speech online," and more...
The attempted muzzling of the former national security advisor is dubious.
When politicians call to punish “disinformation,” we should worry about what that definition encompasses.
A century ago, the Wilson administration cracked down on immigrant anarchists. The raids lasted three months, and their impact was felt for decades.
The bill's requirements for "emergency" orders are loose, and it does not give respondents a right to a court-appointed lawyer.
Erroneous predictions of violence at the Richmond rally conflated civil libertarians with militant racists.
"Facial recognition represents a dystopic advancement of the police state."
That's the logical implication of a recent Second Circuit panel decision (though one involving a non-journalist).
A federal court has allowed the case to go forward, and is considering whether to preliminarily enjoin the restrictions.
orders university to temporarily reinstate accused student for Spring semester.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks