Cancel Culture Is Out of Control
The online mob is running amok.
Posted at the Harper's Magazine site.
"Supreme Court jurisprudence...is heavily weighted against you," an appeals judge told state prosecutors last week.
keeps in place the rest of the law banning robocalls to cell phones.
This deadly and contagious disease has exposed problems with prison systems that have been ignored for decades.
Straka loses on his discrimination, cyberbullying, defamation, and breach of contract claims.
Fitness centers across the state are turning up the resistance to lockdown orders.
Plaintiff had sufficiently alleged that the defendant didn't just create the list as a platform for others, but herself posted material about him -- though whether plaintiff ultimately prevails will depend on what discovery reveals.
"While Ms. Trump unquestionably possesses the same First Amendment expressive rights belonging to all Americans, she also possesses the right to enter into contracts, including the right to contract away her First Amendment rights." One precedent supporting that proposition: Another Trump v. Trump, a 1992 case involving Ivana Trump and Donald Trump.
Washington, D.C.'s writing "Black Lives Matter" on a street and letting others paint "Defund the Police" next to it doesn't require D.C. to let others paint messages on other streets.
Plus: Tech giants will testify in Congressional antitrust hearing, Seattle police clear out CHOP, and more...
So says a Third Circuit panel, though other circuits disagree.
This one focuses on student groups that get funding from public colleges, but it's an unconstitutional viewpoint-based restriction.
The Souls of Yellow Folk author says a new "elite consensus" fixated on racial outrage is forming and may destroy our ability to function.
Plus: More (bad, weird, and occasionally good) new state laws that start taking effect today.
"Hate speech" would be defined as an intentional "insulting statement about a group of persons because of race, ethnicity, nationality, religion or beliefs, sexual orientation, gender identity or physical, mental or intellectual disability."
Can the government compel speech? For Supreme Court justices, that seems to depend on the content of that speech.
"[The Oberlin] panel's decision was arguably inexplicable. Per the terms of Oberlin's Policy, intoxication does not negate consent—only 'incapacitation' does.... And the record here provided no apparent basis for a finding that Roe [was incapacitated]."
"To survive as a ... professor requires constant self-censorship and compromise, especially in the humanities .... Resistance comes at a cost .... [H]er colleague ..., a law professor, was interrogated and suspended from teaching after publishing a series of essays critical of ...."
You generally can't claim self-defense if you're a robber "defending" yourself against your victim's own self-defense—but do you also lose your self-defense rights if your only crime is illegally carrying a handgun?
Rep. Devin Nunes can't hold Twitter liable for allegedly defamatory posts by Twitter user:
A Second Amendment hypocrite with a plan to undermine federalism
Plus: Time to cancel U.S. propaganda outlets, Twitch sued over sexy women, new Assange indictment, social-justice symbolism, and more...
Judge Adelman's article sharply criticizing the Supreme Court, the Seventh Circuit concluded, was largely permissible under the Canons of Judicial Conduct, except "the opening two sentences of the article and the criticisms of recent policy positions taken by one political party."
"Publicly expressing anger toward an elected official is not a basis for entry of an injunction. In public debate, elected officials must tolerate insulting remarks—even angry, outrageous speech—to provide breathing room for the First Amendment."
A new, terrible anti-encryption bill with a twist
"Defendant's Yelp post about plaintiff is reasonably and best understood to be, simply, name-calling."
"Be there by 10:30, lace your shoes, wear masks and gloves. Bring hammers bricks whatever you want."
Two years of rule-flouting by elites and ordinary citizens show the unsustainability of top-down prohibition.
Former professor John Cochrane: "I spent much of my last few years of teaching afraid that I would say something that could be misunderstood and thus be offensive to someone."
He remains a tenured faculty member.
The interest in fighting age discrimination in employment doesn't trump free speech rights.
"By the looks of it, the horse is not just out of the barn—it is out of the country."
Don't lock down expression along with so much else of American society.
Not a high-level official, not a spokesperson, not an endorser -- just an ordinary person.
The decision has been promptly appealed.
Protesters in many countries may find themselves facing down state forces with extralegal powers and a muzzled press.
While there are still numerous barriers to access in Louisiana's medical marijuana system, a specific list of "qualifying conditions" will no longer be one of them.
New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change. Out now for subscribers.