Alabama Supreme Court to Cops: It's OK To Force a Pastor Watering Flowers To Show His ID
The court ruled that police can demand a physical ID under the state's stop-and-identify law.
The court ruled that police can demand a physical ID under the state's stop-and-identify law.
The Ivy League school released a self-critical report this week.
Guns disrupted the established order—and sparked modern-sounding debates over whether they could be effectively regulated.
Plus: The House passes a short-term FISA extension, Ron Wyden urges fellow Senate Democrats to oppose a "clean" bill, and Norway gets robot buses.
Courts are blocking amnesty applications for Venezuelan dissidents with no explanation and no appeal deadline.
The city has created a network of nearly 500 cameras that routinely monitor innocent people as they go about their daily lives.
The judge felt there was probable cause for an arrest but he declined to go so far as to convict.
"Russell insisted that he didn't know how his credentials had been used to run the 'Gins' and 'Ginston' searches. But he theorized that 'potentially his cat had run across the keyboard and typed in those letters.'"
The Justice Department is permanently blocked from prosecuting Californians who fail to register when the state no longer requires it.
What is a greater rejection of America's founding ideals than an overreaching government trampling the First Amendment?
Remembering the infuriating case of United States v. “The Spirit of ’76.”
The president once said he wanted to kill warrantless electronic spying. So much for that.
Families have complained for years that the Bureau of Prisons fails to notify them when their incarcerated loved ones are seriously ill or even dying.
After withdrawing a summons in the face of a legal challenge, the government is seeking a grand jury subpoena.
"I don't even care if you or your mom are inside. I actually hope you are. You both deserve to die. I am going to kill you, Robyn. I don't understand why you don't get that. I will burn you. You will die."
Fortunately, an appellate court just reversed the decision.
The poster, which included a rainbow flag, counts as "instruction that includes sexuality content" and triggers an Ohio parents' rights law, the board said.
If Congress will not deploy the power of the purse to restrain a lawless administration and an illegal war, then it falls to the public to do so.
Plus: New York wants to tax second homes, water in the Dupont Circle fountain, Polish robots chase wild boars, and more...
In the guise of investigating "potentially unlawful advertiser boycotts," the commission is punishing the organization for its views.
"[S]he was told that a Mammy doll which depicts slavery was in the garage of the building where they worked.... [W]hen she saw the doll she was overcome with emotions because it was so humiliating.... [S]he could not control her emotions and could not think clearly."
A police officer threw Renea Gamble to the ground and handcuffed her because her costume might have offended his kids.
Many other courts do generally allow pseudonymity in those particular cases, but the Seventh Circuit disagrees.
online, after they send a demand that they not be named (and declare that there has been an online-naming-related threat or incitement against them by someone else).
Could a court likewise order, say, Gmail to cut off a person's access to his Gmail account, if there's reason to think the person has misused that account for criminal purposes? Does it matter that the person isn't a party to the proceeding, and thus can't assert his free speech rights?
Trump's failure to properly allege "actual malice" is consistent with his long history of filing shaky legal claims against people who say things he does not like.
The court concludes that Trump hadn't adequately alleged facts that would support a finding that the defendants knew the article was false (or were reckless about the prospect); Trump has an opportunity to file an amended complaint if he can identify such facts.
Following a backlash to its Super Bowl commercial, Ring owner Amazon announced that it was canceling a planned partnership with Flock Safety.
"We thought we were on the right side of the law," the Samourai Wallet co-founder tells Reason.
Petitioner's new-found "public figure" status, and concerns that records are "impeding his employment, professional credibility, and personal safety," don't justify sealing, either.
"Market Erasure," "Three Plinths," "The March 2nd Transformation," "Karen" "branding," and "The Commercially Savvy Lawyer."
Free speech lawyers say UNC violated North Carolina’s institutional neutrality law.
The case will determine whether an unnamed plaintiff can take the hospital and its doctors to federal court.
The court doesn't decide whether Meta actually violated state law, or whether it may have a First Amendment defense; those decisions will be made later in the case.
"In essence, the plaintiffs argue that every time a Jew or Jewish organization contributes to (in this instance) a public university and that university, acting under established policy, disciplines a student who advocates for, in this instance, 'particularly Palestinian" policies, the simultaneous presence of the contribution and the discipline creates a plausible inference of a conspiracy between the contributor and the university to punish the "particularly Palestinian' advocate."
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.