D.C.'s U.S. Attorney Is a Menace to the First Amendment
Interim U.S. Attorney Ed Martin puts loyalty to Donald Trump ahead of loyalty to the Constitution.
Interim U.S. Attorney Ed Martin puts loyalty to Donald Trump ahead of loyalty to the Constitution.
"It was blamed on a new hire who hadn't 'fully absorbed' the startup's culture."
Combine moral zealotry with increasingly blurred lines between political speech and violence long enough, and the outcome is predictable.
The president's portrayal of journalism he does not like as consumer fraud is legally frivolous and blatantly unconstitutional.
But though other Justices had expressed doubt about Hill before, only Justices Thomas and Alito noted their willingness to grant review in this case.
Is Florida forgetting that the First Amendment applies there too?
The newly confirmed head of the country's leading law enforcement agency has a history of advocating politically motivated investigations even while condemning them.
"It's shameful that government officials would use the criminal legal process to censor art and expression."
How well-intentioned laws created new cultural conflicts—and eroded personal liberty
Federal Trade Commission Chair Andrew Ferguson hypocritically engages in the very partisanship for which he faults the American Bar Association.
Free speech experts say the takedown order is a clear example of unconstitutional prior restraint under the First Amendment.
Kirk Wolff set out to peacefully protest Trump's plan to take over Gaza. Then an administrator and a police officer drove by.
Thousands of people have lost their bank accounts over "suspicious" activity. Here's what to do if it happens to you.
can go forward, the Eighth Circuit rules.
Law enforcement acts better when officers know the public is watching.
Citing Reddit posts and podcast interviews, pseudonymous government employees are arguing that DOGE violated federal privacy regulations when setting up a government-wide email system.
The reported order from Britain's Home Office is further proof that governments pose a greater privacy risk than corporations.
Mexico's amici take shots at our brief in Smith and Wesson v. Mexico
Civil forfeiture allows the government of Hawaii to take your property and sell it for profit without proving you did anything wrong.
A driver who was acquitted of drunk driving joins a class action lawsuit provoked by a bribery scheme that went undetected for decades.
Margaret Brennan should immediately Google the Weimar Fallacy.
Place names in American English are defined by what American English speakers call them, not what the President tells us to call them.
The Munich Security Conference was supposed to be a foreign policy forum. Instead, the vice president lectured Europeans about democracy.
Conway, New Hampshire, is trying to make a local bakery take down a mural of colorful baked goods. The bakery says that violates its First Amendment rights.
Nearly a dozen lawsuits allege that DOGE's access to government payment and personnel systems violates a litany of federal privacy and record-handling laws.
Please feel free to forward this to anyone you think might be interested.
Despite severe risks and without a crime committed, a Minnesota judge authorized doctors to forcibly administer electroconvulsive therapy—while barring key witnesses from the hearing.
How can government agencies better safeguard procedural due process rights?
"no matter how challenging or controversial a topic may be."
How does AI challenge basic procedural due process protections and what should be done?
So holds the Florida Court of Appeal, rejecting the members' claim that they aren't subject to personal jurisdiction in Florida. The majority doesn't discuss the substantive merits of the case.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10