Child Welfare Systems Are Trapping Innocent Families
Georgia parents were accused of child abuse after they took their daughter to the doctor. Does the state's story add up?
Georgia parents were accused of child abuse after they took their daughter to the doctor. Does the state's story add up?
"Every teacher, every classroom in the state will have a Bible in the classroom and will be teaching from the Bible in the classroom," state Superintendent Ryan Walters announced last week.
Keir Starmer’s Labour secures a sweeping victory, taking the helm from Rishi Sunak.
The official argued, among other things, that defendant's speech constituted "words of incitement" intended "to rile up the Black community to attack [her]."
Department of Education settlements with protest-wracked colleges threaten censorship by bureaucracy.
Supervised release shouldn't require former inmates to give up their First Amendment rights.
The creator of Masameer County was charged with promoting homosexuality and terrorism for his South Park-style satirical cartoon.
And the Supreme Court agrees to weigh in.
An Ohio trial court issued the injunction, but the Ohio Court of Appeals has just set it aside.
Contrary to progressive criticism, curtailing bureaucratic power is not about protecting "the wealthy and powerful."
Jane Bambauer and I quickly run down what happened in these two cases (both of which involved First Amendment challenges and social media).
Even as he praises judicial decisions that made room for "dissenters" and protected "robust political debate," Tim Wu pushes sweeping rationales for censorship.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson says these cases will "devastate" the regulatory state. Good.
The surveillance company mSpy just suffered its third data breach in a decade, exposing government officials snooping for both official and unofficial reasons.
Justice Alito takes a similar view, but, at least in this case, this view didn't get the four votes necessary to grant review.
Plus: A disappointing first round of "Baby YIMBY" grant awards, President Joe Biden endorses rent control, and House Republicans propose cutting housing spending.
But, at least in this case, this view didn't get the four votes necessary to grant review.
The defendant had alleged that he, his family, and his lawyer had been threatened by the public, but the Ohio Supreme Court concluded that the trial court wasn't given adequate evidence to justify sealing.
And a grand jury says that's illegal.
The Court is remanding these two cases for more analysis—but it made its views on some key issues clear.
China's free speech record is bad, but the federal government's isn't so great either.
Abortion should have been an easy win for Biden, but his incoherent answer during Thursday's debate allowed Trump to come out on top.
The Court says Chevron deference allows bureaucrats to usurp a judicial function, creating "an eternal fog of uncertainty" about what the law allows or requires.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor called the Supreme Court ruling in SEC v. Jarkesy "a power grab." She's right, but in the wrong way.
Americans shouldn’t count on the department to use the technology responsibly or in a limited way.
Assange's plea deal sets a threatening precedent for free speech and journalism.
The decision rejects a system in which the agency imposes civil penalties after investigating people and validating its own allegations.
The decision reverses the Court's previous stay of a lower court decision blocking part of the law.
A year after a court told Maryland police that Cellebrite searches were too broad, Baltimore quietly resumed using the software.
Although the FBI never produced evidence that Ali Hemani was a threat to national security, it seems determined to imprison him by any means necessary.
The real dissents are the concurrences by Justices Sotomayor and Jackson.
The standing requirements laid down by the majority might make it extremely difficult or impossible for victims of indirect goverment censorship to get their cases to court.
The verdict in Murthy v. Missouri is a big, flashing green light that jawboning may resume.
It's a classic case of jawboning.
The candidate makes the case against the two-party system.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10