Alabama Draws on Supreme Court's New Abortion Decision To Justify Trans Youth Treatment Ban
Alabama's attorney general argues such medical transitioning is not rooted in America’s history and therefore not constitutionally protected.
Alabama's attorney general argues such medical transitioning is not rooted in America’s history and therefore not constitutionally protected.
The FDA could work with the Department of Justice to sue states over mifepristone bans. But should it?
Grappling with surveillance implications of Roe being overturned
National legislation and extraterritorial application of state laws are inconsistent with the local leeway that the Constitution protects.
so the District Court can reconsider it in light of the Supreme Court's new Bruen precedent.
There is demand for child tax credits, paid family leave, and funding for crisis pregnancy centers but the Rubio-Romney plan is not the answer.
Anti-discrimination law was pioneered by the political left. But, in recent years, conservatives have increasingly tried to use it for their own purposes.
California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, or D.C.?
I lost my motion opposing pseudonymity in the District of New Hampshire, though I'm appealing to the First Circuit.
The Sixth Circuit disagrees with the Second Circuit in the @RealDonaldTrump case (but maybe not by much).
The Virginia governor's proposed 15-week ban shows what a moderate approach to abortion looks like.
Plus: stereotypes within libertarianism, and Katherine compares the editors to Buffy the Vampire Slayer characters.
IVF at "significant risk"
A 6–3 majority sees it as noncoercive and not a violation of the Establishment Clause.
The Supreme Court may have overturned Roe v. Wade, but it has not ended legal battles over abortion.
Justice Thomas reiterates his desire to revisit the contours of defamation law and New York Times v. Sullivan.
Plus: What overturning Roe means for Republicans' future, court halts ban of Juul products, and more...
There’s no painless way to restrict choices for people who resist.
Although the chief justice's incrementalism did not sway his colleagues, his observations about the meaning of a "right to choose" could be relevant in state legislatures.
Liberals won't reconcile themselves to Dobbs, any more than conservatives accepted Roe v. Wade and Casey.
The California AG endorses denying licenses based on the applicant's "hatred" or "racism."
In his Dobbs concurrence, the senior associate justice reiterates his outlying views on precedent and his belief that all substantive due process decisions were "demonstrably erroneous."
Both majority and dissenting opinions include extensive discussions of stare decisis. But the truth is whether you think Roe v. Wade should have been preserved on that basis is heavily correlated with whether you think it was wrong in the first place.
If life begins at conception, there are virtually no limits on government surveillance of women in a post-Roe world.
A weird, messy protest reflects a weird, messy future.
The ruling against New York's carry permit policy is a rebuke to courts that routinely rubber-stamp gun restrictions.
The conservative majority's commitments on contraception, sexual intimacy, and same-sex marriage
The other justices declined to join him, but the future of the Supreme Court rulings on those matters remains unclear.
This makes it likely, though not certain, that the Supreme Court will strike down such laws if states enact them.
The complaining student alleged the students' remarks were "harassing and threatening" him because of his conservative "political affiliation" and his "religious beliefs."
He also nixes the idea that states could "retroactively impose liability or punishment for an abortion that occurred before today's decision takes effect."
The Constitution protects many more rights than it mentions, as James Madison explained.
Most states are unlikely to enact bans, but 22 either have them already or probably will soon.
Plus: Abortion and free speech, Juul fights back, and more...
The intruders created plenty of mayhem, but it was a farcical coup attempt doomed from the start.
"We could not abandon ongoing representations just because a client's position is unpopular in some circles."
The new rules would drop live hearings, bring back the single-investigator model, and limit accused students' options.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10